x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Hidden picShow menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Live picture leaks of the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge scoring 134K on AnTuTu?

Live picture leaks of the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge scoring 134K on AnTuTu?

Posted: , by Alan F.

Tags:

Leaked live image of the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge

Leaked live image of the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge

This morning, an image showing the back of the Samsung Galaxy S7 leaked, confirming the nearly flush rear camera lens that we've been expecting. Now, a live image of the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has surfaced, revealing the front of the device in use. On the screen, we can see that the handset has been put through the AnTuTu benchmark test and scored an incredible 134,704.

While U.S. and Chinese consumers will be receiving the version of the phone packed with the Snapdragon 820 chipset, the rest of the world will have the Exynos 8890 SoC under the hood. It isn't certain which chip is powering the phone in the photo.

The Galaxy S7 edge will feature a 5.5-inch Super AMOLED display, carrying a 1440 x 2560 QHD resolution. 4GB of RAM will be inside. On the back, we expect to find a 12MP BRITECELL camera. A 3600mAh battery is expected to keep the lights on.

Both the Samsung Galaxy S7 and the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge are due to be unveiled on February 21st at the Samsung Unpacked 2016 event that is being held the day before the MWC opens in Barcelona.

While the photo looks genuine, we still suggest taking the image (and the AnTuTu score) with the proverbial grain of salt.

source: Weibo via 9to5Google

84 Comments
  • Options
    Close




posted on 08 Feb 2016, 15:35 1

1. CX3NT3_713 (Posts: 2237; Member since: 18 Apr 2011)


So it's a Galaxy edge 7S ?

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 15:39 21

7. killer7D (Posts: 253; Member since: 18 Sep 2014)


Its a Galaxy S7 Edge

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 16:22 4

27. MSi_GS70 (unregistered)


why plastic back ?? why NEVER metal ..

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 16:57 4

36. combatmedic870 (Posts: 548; Member since: 02 Sep 2015)


I'd rather plastic vs metal personally. Would just mean no reception issues. Now glass vs metal is a different story. But I always rock a thin case

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 18:03

51. talon95 (Posts: 427; Member since: 31 Jul 2012)


I don't mind plastic either but it has to look good. I'm not liking the look of the leaked images very much. I would rather see carbon fiber or something like the Turbo. The Note5 actually looks good as is.

Maybe they are going to do the plastic flexible screen that's shatter proof and that's why they don't think they need it bordered with metal. And if so maybe the back is the same material.

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 21:48 3

66. engineer-1701d (Posts: 3214; Member since: 13 Mar 2014)


plastic is better gives us grip and interchangeable also think about it removable means battery and sd card swap

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 23:12

68. matistight (Posts: 420; Member since: 13 May 2009)


You can't have wireless charging with metal. You need plastic or glass.

posted on 10 Feb 2016, 14:47

81. TechieXP1969 (Posts: 7919; Member since: 25 Sep 2013)


False. You can have wireless charging with a metal case, you just have to cover ti with a special case.

http://www.theverge.com/2015/7/28/9058583/qualcomm-wireless-charging-metal-phones

posted on 11 Feb 2016, 05:29

84. techbuttcheex (Posts: 58; Member since: 25 Jul 2015)


Its glass... not plastic.

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 15:49 23

16. XperiaFanZone (Posts: 2017; Member since: 21 Sep 2012)


Why are there a lot of hypocrisy when it comes to benchmarks? Android fans now shouting beast after complaining that antutu was unreliable and Apple fans were going crazy about the antutu benchmark of the iPhone, now when they see this it's just "numbers on the screen"?

Let me add one more for fun: does this benchmark prove that antutu has killed major bugs since the 6s benchmark?

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 16:01 5

21. AlikMalix (Posts: 4855; Member since: 16 Jul 2014)


Post of the day. +1

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 17:02 8

37. Good-Is-Better (Posts: 70; Member since: 12 Nov 2015)


There are lot of things that make this a beast more than the iPhone crap. First of all, the specs inside make it a beast, whether good specs is not all that matters, it is there. We know that the way Android is coded and the way it is heavy makes it run slower than the iOS. Supposed this phone runs with iOS, what do you think would be the AnTuTu benchmark scores?

Comparing iOS and Android AnTuTu benchmarks is just way stupid.
If people complains about the AnTuTu benchmarks in the icrap 6s, it is because we still don't know what make the mid range icrap get those scores.
As far as Android is concerned, this phone is a beast. Sorry if that makes you mad.

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 17:35 6

44. Awalker (Posts: 1368; Member since: 15 Aug 2013)


People have said the test puts more focus on single core performance which makes it less relevant to Android. Most apps on Android use multiple cores so testing single core performance doesn't make sense.

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 17:44

45. j2001m (Posts: 2758; Member since: 28 Apr 2014)


It mean something apart fro the software is not the same for iOS but when you look at the score and the screen res (big thing in this case) and it makes the CPU look very good, if the iPhone/iOS was running this CPU over the A9 the score will have been very big like 160000

posted on 10 Feb 2016, 14:54

82. TechieXP1969 (Posts: 7919; Member since: 25 Sep 2013)


The score doesn't mean anything to me and I havent commented on it.

Here is what the problem is. The AnTuTu software has been tailored to work very well with iOS.

Its basic code allows it to test any Android phone, but the tests are not designed to deal with how different Android hardware is.

For example, its like Windows Drivers vs Retail drivers. Windows Drivers are design to provide the basic function of a device. So a video card for exampel, a Windows driver will ensure it provides stable and working video. But your OEM's retails drivers provide the extra support specific to the functions of the graphics card.

This is how many benchmark tools are. They use basic driver code which isn't taking in consideration the difference in how Samsung used ARM references in their Exynos vs how Qualcomm may use ARM's reference designs vs how Apple may also use their referenced designs.

A perfect example of that? Take you Windows PC and install Microsoft's generic GPU drivers and do a benchmark and then remove them and install your GPU's native driver from the manufacturer and see how different the score is.

This is the same that is happening with mobile bench-marking tools.

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 15:35 5

2. Atrixboyyy (Posts: 323; Member since: 03 Nov 2011)


Beast!

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 15:37 12

5. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 10620; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)


They're just numbers on a screen.

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 19:22 3

60. NoToFanboys (Posts: 1030; Member since: 03 Oct 2015)


Android fanboys were saying that when iPhone was winning in benchmarks.
Hypocrisy is in fanboys on BOTH sides. smh

posted on 09 Feb 2016, 13:10 1

77. downphoenix (Posts: 3154; Member since: 19 Jun 2010)


I think that was Mxy's point.

posted on 09 Feb 2016, 20:29

78. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 10620; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)


Just give him some time to process it.

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 15:55 4

18. Arch_Fiend (Posts: 1943; Member since: 03 Oct 2015)


My 6s Plus scored close to that just the other day but yeah it is a beast to get such a score with a QHD screen.

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 16:22 8

26. eden555 (Posts: 26; Member since: 21 Jan 2016)


qhd does strain a phone when benchmarking

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 18:04 2

53. Rafael1703 (Posts: 6; Member since: 22 Apr 2014)


Yes, indeed. But Antutu graphical tests are done in 1080p in all the phones to keep things fair.

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 18:24 4

54. Ordinary (Posts: 2142; Member since: 23 Apr 2015)


Wrong. There is on-screen and off-screen in the same test.

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 19:41 1

62. Rafael1703 (Posts: 6; Member since: 22 Apr 2014)


Yes, and the on-screen tests run at 1080p

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 19:49 1

63. Arch_Fiend (Posts: 1943; Member since: 03 Oct 2015)


The graphics test do run in 1080p but the pixels of the screen are still on and affect the score just look at this.

https://gfxbench.com/compare.jsp?benchmark=gfxgen&did1=27341261&os1=Android&api1=gl&hwtype1=GPU&hwname1=ARM+Mali-T760+MP8+%28octa+core%29&D2=Samsung+Galaxy+Note5+%28SM-N920x%29

Manhattan is ran in 1080p and T-rex in 720p but that doesn't matter as the QHD resolution of the screen(Note5) despite the render resolution of the test being lower still greatly affects the FPS/GPU score.

The resolution being rendered and the resolution of screen both affect the score in any gpu test, screen resolution it even affects off screen but only slightly.

posted on 09 Feb 2016, 03:13 1

72. Ordinary (Posts: 2142; Member since: 23 Apr 2015)


On-screen runs at 1440p...

posted on 09 Feb 2016, 06:34

75. Rafael1703 (Posts: 6; Member since: 22 Apr 2014)


Whatever you say.

posted on 10 Feb 2016, 14:56

83. TechieXP1969 (Posts: 7919; Member since: 25 Sep 2013)


No the off=screen test do. The on-screen tests can only run at the resolution of the screen itself. That is why most tests are done off-screen, so that the test results are fair.

I think I'm right, but someone will correct me if I'm not.

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 23:44

69. eden555 (Posts: 26; Member since: 21 Jan 2016)


what about the 6s with a 720p screen ??? shure it will do better compared to 2k screens.

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 17:46 2

47. j2001m (Posts: 2758; Member since: 28 Apr 2014)


Your iPhone got an 1080p screen, the iPhone with this cup will have got like 160000

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 18:03 1

52. Arch_Fiend (Posts: 1943; Member since: 03 Oct 2015)


IDK about that. The mi5 with its 1080p screen only beats the 6s plus in gfx by 1-2 fps. but sure antutu score would probably be like 160k+.
You did read the part where I said the phone was a beast for getting 134k score with an QHD screen right.

People like you make me sick, I give the phone/soc props for getting such a high score while having a QHD screen and here you come acting as if i dissed the phone and didn't give it the credit it deserves.

Fanboys pis me off.

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 15:36 3

3. engineer-1701d (Posts: 3214; Member since: 13 Mar 2014)


looks like its got a little curve at the top and bottom.

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 16:08

24. talon95 (Posts: 427; Member since: 31 Jul 2012)


I agree. If they truly formed spherical corners I will be impressed for a moment, and then I will despise the design because there is no metal to protect the screen at all.

I think it would be pure stupidity to leave a glass screen (and back) with no protection. You can't put a case on it that would save the glass, and if you did it would defeat the purpose of the curve.
This is one of the reasons I dislike Apple watch, it scratches too easy with nothing but glass protruding. It should have a ring of metal with counter sunk glass like every G-Shock ever made.

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 21:52 1

67. engineer-1701d (Posts: 3214; Member since: 13 Mar 2014)


what if it's Sapphire or a plexiglass type with filed screen making it almost indestructible

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 15:37 10

4. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 10620; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)


I don't think benchmarks are going to matter because in a few months it will be running a lot slower than that.

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 15:40 18

8. killer7D (Posts: 253; Member since: 18 Sep 2014)


My S6 Edge Plus is not slower compared to the time i bought it (September-2015)

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 16:03 12

22. ihearlivepplz (Posts: 75; Member since: 06 Jul 2015)


My S6 is actually faster than when I bought it :x

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 17:24 3

41. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 10620; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)


You =/= everyone

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 17:44 9

46. willard12 (Posts: 1515; Member since: 04 Jul 2012)


Since you volunteered your expert opinion, how is your S6 Edge + running after the few months you've had it? Or, do you not have it and are just giving an opinion on something you are clueless about?

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 17:49

48. j2001m (Posts: 2758; Member since: 28 Apr 2014)


All I am going. To say is the new Samsung phone s class for 2015 are the 1st of any Samsung phones to be reported by pocket now after the buzz at being fast and not lagging, it's the big thing they won them over with the note 5 over the note 4 with the hem removing the battery and so on, how good the software is

It's UFS and nothing to do with the software Emmc is crap (covers up the vm skin lag)

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 19:12

58. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 10620; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)


You sound just like another commenter who kept posting the same bs. I'll tell you the same thing, get over it. It's called an opinion.

posted on 09 Feb 2016, 00:20

70. Sovat_fc (Posts: 224; Member since: 30 Aug 2014)


@Mxyzptlk - Dear wanker! My 2-year G3 still works like a charm or as fast as the day I bought. It's obvious that you judge Android by its low-end phones. Well, you definitely deserve to be called "a wanker" as what I mentioned earlier.

posted on 09 Feb 2016, 03:10

71. tnuc2014 (Posts: 216; Member since: 12 Sep 2014)


A bit harsh. I've had many of the top end Android phones over the years, and they have without exception started to lag after 6 months or so. I currently have the Galaxy S6 Edge Plus, which I love and the iPhone 6S Plus, and the iPhone is far smoother. I can only talk from experience. Android is certainly a lot better than it was the last time I used it, but it just isn't as smooth as iOS.

posted on 09 Feb 2016, 20:31

79. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 10620; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)


Oh I'm sorry, I forgot to care. Nope still don't care.

You call me a wanker and you're the one rocking a G3.

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 19:09 3

55. iushnt (Posts: 1484; Member since: 06 Feb 2013)


This applies to you as well. Your opinion =/= everyone's. You mad bro? Never seen apple worshippers so insecure.

posted on 09 Feb 2016, 20:32

80. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 10620; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)


You salty bro? Dry those tears up.

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 15:40 13

9. SenorThrottles (Posts: 220; Member since: 23 Dec 2015)


Both my S6 and 6P still run lightning fast so...

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 16:32 9

30. fyahking (Posts: 859; Member since: 28 Jan 2015)


I know what you mean by iOS slowing down with every updates.

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 16:35 10

32. tedkord (Posts: 9942; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)


Your rectal distress is hilarious.

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 17:23 1

40. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 10620; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)


Your backtracking is even more hilarious.

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 19:11 1

56. iushnt (Posts: 1484; Member since: 06 Feb 2013)


U mad bro?

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 20:12 1

64. tedkord (Posts: 9942; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)


What backtracking? Are you hallucinating? The Note 5 remains the best.

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 15:38 1

6. killer7D (Posts: 253; Member since: 18 Sep 2014)


I like the front .. But it seems the front camera will remain without a flash.

The score is really amazing. I think this device is using the Exynos chip!

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 15:42

10. martinjhm271 (Posts: 37; Member since: 16 Aug 2015)


No,it's snapdragon 820 version
antutu.com/qr/?c=8a7f5bfb665e6d17b86e807b242883a2e​43a441b

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 15:42 2

11. Ordinary (Posts: 2142; Member since: 23 Apr 2015)


"antutu"

Nuff said.

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 15:44 4

12. SkyfallWalker (Posts: 73; Member since: 28 Jan 2016)


Can't wait to sink my teeth into the Galaxy S7. It's time I retired my Note 3.

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 15:45 1

13. AstronautJones (Posts: 302; Member since: 01 Aug 2012)


That is the Chinese variant w Snapdragon, according to another website. This info is from a previous leak detailing diff model #s.

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 15:46

14. SkyfallWalker (Posts: 73; Member since: 28 Jan 2016)


I would love to buy a Sony or HTC smartphone this year as well. I hope there aren't any shortcomings with them, like in the camera optics division.

posted on 08 Feb 2016, 15:48

15. zig8100 (Posts: 227; Member since: 13 Dec 2012)


Killin it. Im still going to miss the removable battery.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories