x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Hidden picShow menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Did Sundar Pichai really say that Android was not designed to be safe?

Did Sundar Pichai really say that Android was not designed to be safe?

Posted: , by Michael H.

Tags :

Did Sundar Pichai really say that Android was not designed to be safe?
If you've been watching the news today, you probably saw some headlines concerning some answers that Sundar Pichai gave at Mobile World Congress this week. We covered the story earlier, because Pichai confirmed that a Nexus 6 will be on the way in the second half of the year, and talked a bit about Samsung as well. However, some are reporting that Pichai said that Android was not designed to be safe, which you might think is a bigger headline, assuming that's really what he said. 

Here's the full quote from Pichai:

We cannot guarantee that Android is designed to be safe, the format was designed to give more freedom. When people talk about 90% of malware for Android, they must of course take into account the fact that it is the most popular operating system in the world. If I had a company dedicated to malware, I would also be addressing my attacks on Android...

Sensationalism?


When we reported the story earlier, the section of the quote that we focused on was the second part where Pichai said that because Android is the "most used operating system in the world", it makes sense that malware attacks would be focused on Android. That's what we reported because that was the story. But, some are focusing on the first part of that quote, and we think they are sensationalizing the quote a bit. 

Many are paraphrasing Pichai as saying that Android is not designed to be safe, it is designed to be open. We can't help wonder if that reading of what he said is taking the words, not the meaning. It seems that Pichai is merely stating that Google can't guarantee that Android is safe, just like any company can't 100% guarantee something like that. Google has often pointed out the various ways that it is working to keep Android users safe, including various forms of malware scanning both in the Google Play Store and on devices with the Verify Apps service. Google has said that because of this combination, less than .001% of malware actually gets a chance to attempt an attack. And, a new report is saying that Verify Apps will soon offer continuous background monitoring. 

The existence of the Verify Apps service does point to one of those "open" features that Google prides itself on with Android: sideloading apps. The Verify Apps service is mostly there to scan sideloaded apps, because Google already has similar features in the Google Play Store to catch malware before users download and install it. This alone would suggest that the headlines have been sensationalized, because this key feature gives control to users, and when you give control to users on something as fundamental as installing an app, you can never guarantee the safety of a platform. Google can do all it wants to protect users, but no one can be protected from themselves.

Or a warning?


But, what if what Pichai said is exactly what others are portraying? Maybe Pichai meant exactly what he said: Android itself isn't designed to be safe... but Google Play services is, so you'd best be using an Android device with Google Play services if you want to be safe. We may never really know the answer to that, but it is an interesting question. 

There have been consistent rumors that one of the reasons that Larry Page chose to make Sundar Pichai the head of Android and replace Andy Rubin is because Pichai is much more forceful and able to make deals that others can't. Part of that skill is in how you present yourself and your product. Since Pichai took over, there has been a much bigger push of Google services. Google Play services has been updated quite frequently with a ton of features; Google Apps have continually taken over stock Android apps (like the G+ Photos app and the Google Now Launcher); and, Google has set up new rules to enforce faster software updates by manufacturers and newer software at launch. 

That last one is especially interesting. It is rumored that there is a new requirement in order to qualify for Google Mobile Services (Google Play and Google Apps), which states that a new device has to launch with a certain level of Android. For example, as of April 24th a new device has to launch with Android 4.3 in order to qualify, and as of July 31st, a new device will have to launch with Android 4.4. This is a great way to get devices on the market that start out with the newest Android software possible, but it could also backfire and lead to more devices launching without Google services. 

And, there are the forks to consider as well. Amazon is the biggest in the U.S., Xiaomi runs a fork of Android that is very successful in China, and of course Nokia recently announced its own fork of Android that trades in Google services for Microsoft cloud services. None of those devices have Google Play services, so wouldn't it be a pretty interesting move if Pichai is actually taking aim at those forks with this comment? If Android isn't designed to be safe, those forks of Android are inherently less safe than a device with Google Play services. 

Conclusion


That would be a very risky way to play it, especially since Pichai didn't make that distinction, which makes it sound as though Android as a whole is less than safe. But, Pichai has been working to put Google at the forefront as well as to make Google Play services a much more valuable set of features than just access to Google Apps and the Google Play Store. We'll have to wait and see if there are any more interesting quotes like this. 

Of course, maybe the quote is being misrepresented all around the web. There are quite a lot of assumptions to be made in order to arrive at the second way of reading Pichai's quote, so Occan's Razor would say that it is much more likely that tech blogs want to drive more traffic. What do you guys think? Is it sensationalism or is Pichai taking aim at non-Google Androids?

71 Comments
  • Options
    Close






posted on 27 Feb 2014, 16:41 9

1. Neo_Huang (Posts: 1067; Member since: 06 Dec 2013)


Only interested in Android 4.5.

posted on 27 Feb 2014, 16:51 15

6. akki20892 (Posts: 3901; Member since: 04 Feb 2013)


I'm interested in Android 4.5.2.4.6.7.4.2.1.1.1.1.0

posted on 27 Feb 2014, 20:03

44. arenanew (Posts: 281; Member since: 30 Dec 2013)


who this idiot he is salesmen of underwear . i think he ameture people openly said , i think forked verrsion is more safe than goole

posted on 27 Feb 2014, 22:25 13

54. SuperMaoriBro (Posts: 527; Member since: 23 Jun 2012)


Wtf did this guy say? Can someone please translate

posted on 27 Feb 2014, 22:55 3

56. bugsbunny00 (Posts: 2120; Member since: 07 Jun 2013)


who tf you talking about sis? a guy in underwear..and what tf is goole?

posted on 27 Feb 2014, 23:37 2

58. Ashoaib (Posts: 3229; Member since: 15 Nov 2013)


F*ck this guy... I like andriod experience better then ios...

posted on 27 Feb 2014, 16:45 2

2. XperiaFanZone (Posts: 2146; Member since: 21 Sep 2012)


EDIT: I take it back m

posted on 27 Feb 2014, 16:50 1

5. XperiaFanZone (Posts: 2146; Member since: 21 Sep 2012)


I don't, really, but I didn't want to start a war.

posted on 27 Feb 2014, 16:51 5

7. akki20892 (Posts: 3901; Member since: 04 Feb 2013)


How sweet of you.

posted on 27 Feb 2014, 16:52 1

8. XperiaFanZone (Posts: 2146; Member since: 21 Sep 2012)


Tonight.

posted on 27 Feb 2014, 17:56 1

29. Commentator (Posts: 3709; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)


We are young.

posted on 27 Feb 2014, 21:35 1

53. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10457; Member since: 14 May 2012)


So let's set the world on fire.

posted on 27 Feb 2014, 22:50 5

55. akki20892 (Posts: 3901; Member since: 04 Feb 2013)


This is Sony zone dude.

posted on 27 Feb 2014, 16:49 9

3. UglyFrank (Posts: 1725; Member since: 23 Jan 2014)


You are twisting his words

posted on 27 Feb 2014, 16:49 11

4. Dastrix (unregistered)


Infected as always... Nothing new here.

posted on 27 Feb 2014, 17:01 19

13. WHoyton1 (Posts: 1635; Member since: 21 Feb 2013)


Grow up...I would chose freedom over the tiny miniscule risk of malware any day...go back to your closed WP

posted on 27 Feb 2014, 17:04 21

14. papss (unregistered)


I find it ironic that you said for him to grow up and then act like a child in the same sentence

posted on 27 Feb 2014, 17:08 16

17. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10457; Member since: 14 May 2012)


This site has completely ignored all forms of education this past week. Sad to say the least..

posted on 27 Feb 2014, 17:20 3

18. elitewolverine (Posts: 5188; Member since: 28 Oct 2013)


closed wp? you mean how no one here knows what a google less android experience really is? And the whole, if you want to be safe don't install non google play store...

i don't need my phone of all things to be 'stupid' open, i have a 12in touch tablet for those occasions...imo that is.

posted on 27 Feb 2014, 18:17 4

35. tedkord (Posts: 12243; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)


We do know. Kindle, Nook, Cowon...

posted on 27 Feb 2014, 17:40 4

24. CX3NT3_713 (Posts: 2283; Member since: 18 Apr 2011)


You must love being Scroogeled , haha here's some Vaseline

posted on 27 Feb 2014, 20:30 1

49. rodneyej1 (Posts: 3576; Member since: 06 Jul 2013)


Closed, and safe?

posted on 27 Feb 2014, 20:35 2

51. eharris560 (Posts: 78; Member since: 28 Dec 2012)


Freedom to do what exactly. Customize the way your phone boots up, change the looks of icons, change the rom, remove some bloat ware, and side load some apps. Yeah all of those things are more important than the security of my information and money.

posted on 27 Feb 2014, 20:44 3

52. PBXtech (Posts: 1032; Member since: 21 Oct 2013)


I've done all that and never had a problem. Sounds like you're sensationalizing it a bit too much.

posted on 28 Feb 2014, 00:42

62. bon24x7 (Posts: 206; Member since: 30 Aug 2012)


How do you know there's no problem? Such things remain hidden until its found. If you never had a problem it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. You can never be sure unless you're really good at coding and has enough time to go through all the source codes.:-/

posted on 02 Mar 2014, 22:28

73. slyhounddog (Posts: 20; Member since: 28 Jun 2013)


If you don't like your keyboard, change it. If you don't like how your icons look, change it. If you don't like how your phone looks, acts, or performs, change it. That's the power of android. On apple, all those things already look, act, and perform well and as they should so there is no need to change it. On android at least you have the choice. On apple you don't need one. That's the power of the consumer. And fan boys like you really just like to watch the world burn don't you?

posted on 27 Feb 2014, 18:01 11

30. Commentator (Posts: 3709; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)


I mean, I've used Android for nearly four years now, and I've never been infected by malware, but whatever...

I suppose my lag-free Nexus 5 is also super laggy too? Man, where would I be without you telling me what my experiences have been like? Thanks, Dastrix!

posted on 27 Feb 2014, 18:08 3

32. networkdood (Posts: 6330; Member since: 31 Mar 2010)


lol, Nexys 5 is so lag free - but, so was my Droid RAZR.....I get what the guy is saying as the platform is open, but you, meaning people, just need to use some common sense, which, you know how that goes....

posted on 27 Feb 2014, 18:43 1

38. elitewolverine (Posts: 5188; Member since: 28 Oct 2013)


Because urs is not laggy doesn't mean that it is not a problem nor that their experience is less valid than yours. I have never had a virus since 98, my browsing history is not 'clean'. That doesn't mean that windows doesn't have virus.

posted on 28 Feb 2014, 16:04

71. CX3NT3_713 (Posts: 2283; Member since: 18 Apr 2011)


ROTFL @"lag-free"

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories