Analyst says that Nokia could reduce cost of producing Lumia models by 17%
According to the analyst, the cost of materials for the Nokia Lumia 800 is $238 and is $167 for the Nokia Lumia 710. With the phones priced at 420 EUR ($560) and 270 EUR ($360) respectively, the analyst believes that Nokia could sell a lot more phones by offering a model priced at 220 EUR ($293); to make this a possibility, Kvaal suggests that Nokia substitute some parts and remove others. The majority of the savings would come from a smaller screen size and a lower quality display along with lower priced memory and processor.
For example, instead of the 3.7 inch "ClearBlack" screen on the Lumia 710, the analyst recommends that Nokia put a 3 inch TFT screen on the lower end device. While the "ClearBlack" technology reduces glare and makes for a more pleasing display outdoors, replacing the screen with a smaller one without "ClearBlack" could shave $5 off the cost of material for the phone. Another $5 could be saved by halving the amount of RAM from 512MB to 256MB.
The Nokia Lumia 800 is a quad-band phone and the Nokia Lumia 710 is a tri-band model, both supporting speeds as high as 14.4Mbps. Kvaal states that further savings could be achieved by offering a model with single/dual band connectivity capable of 7.2Mbps. On the Lumia 710, that would take another $3 off the cost of parts. While both Lumia models currently have a single-core 1.4GHz processor under the hood, changing to a 1GHz processor could allow Nokia to get by with a smaller battery. Going from the 1300mAh cell in the Lumia 710 to a 1200mAh battery would save $2 per unit in production costs without a huge difference in the quality of the phone's operation.
A huge $10 in material costs for the Nokia Lumia 710 could be cut by getting rid of the compass and the back-facing camera. Add in a lower cost supplier of Wi-Fi technology and the phone's printed circuit board, and all together the reductions add up to $38 or 17% off the cost of producing the Lumia 710. And that, says the analyst, is how Nokia could offer a new phone for just 220 EUR.
volume based savings in procuring parts and components. And the beauty of this plan is that it keeps Nokia within the parameters set up by Microsoft for running its mobile OS. Redmond asks for only 256MB of RAM on Windows Phone handsets and no minimum sized battery is required.
Would Nokia be cutting its profit margins by offering such a lower priced phone, even with the cut in material costs? Kvaal points out that Nokia has a 25% profit margin on the higher-end Lumia 800 and a 20-21% margin on the Lumia 710. According to the analyst, making the changes he suggests and selling such a phone for 220 EUR would also result in a 20-21% margin. The only question is, would consumers accept some of the changes such as the smaller screen and the lower amount of RAM? You could argue that any difference in perceived quality could be offset by a lower retail price, but it seems to us that Nokia does not want to position itself as a producer of bargain smartphones.
1. ZEUS.the.thunder.god (unregistered)
at this point of time Nokia needs more high end devices instead of cheap phones. Lumia 800 is a very good device but its not good enough against something like SGS II
2. Yeeee (Posts: 190; Member since: 02 Aug 2011)
237$ wtf? It doesnt even have 1 gb of ram or lte or a dual core
7. Birds (Posts: 991; Member since: 21 Nov 2011)
Uni-body, construction you Bat! lol jk. I thought the samething until I really thought about all the complex technology that went into the device. lol I just don't want the excuse of lte is more complex than the rest of that. Nokia spent alot of time trying to design this phone, although the cheaper price would be nice.
3. 7series7 (Posts: 4; Member since: 09 Dec 2010)
Lets not forget about different software license and patents costs involved which is not included in the hardware manufacturing cost.
4. hepresearch (unregistered)
The real problem here is: How could the resulting phone still meet the minimum requirements, posted by Microsoft, to run Windows Phone? A 3-inch screen with less than 480x800 resolution? Less than 512 MB of RAM? No built-in compass sensor? If I am remembering correctly, these particular suggested specs are sub-standard for Microsoft to allow their OS to be put on it. It would end up having to run Series 40 Touch-n-Type (Java)...
5. Joshing4fun (Posts: 1047; Member since: 13 Aug 2010)
Hey Nokia! This is not the time to be cutting corners!
6. redmd (Posts: 893; Member since: 26 Oct 2011)
I like the idea of a budget wp7 handset as long as it performs smoothly and on par with other wp7 phones. niche no more?
8. Stoli89 (Posts: 333; Member since: 28 Jun 2010)
Always nice to get an opinion from an analyst on how a company should produce its phones. I guess the CEO should ignore 1000's of years of experience from an army of product development, manufacturing, procurement, and marketing people to take this "experts" opinion front and center.
What a joke.
11. dmn666 (Posts: 194; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)
True! This smartphone era spawned boatloads of so-called experts, analysts, reviewers, etc who are infesting this whole web. Sometimes it gets really hard to deal with their BS.How come a nameless expert tries to teach Nokia phone business. There has to be a limit.
9. DontHateOnS60 (Posts: 852; Member since: 20 Apr 2009)
So basically this genius wants Nokia to make a piece of s**t, priced way more than it should be, that nobody is going to buy.
10. hepresearch (unregistered)
Yes. It will be so cheap that it cannot host Windows Phone on board. It will have to be an all-touchscreen Series 40 device costing at least 50% more than the Nokia Asha 303... what a genius way for Nokia to commit suicide...