Virgin Mobile USA to be acquired by Sprint for $483 million
Virgin Mobile USA CEO Dan Schulman will be named the head of Sprint's prepaid business and will report directly to Sprint CEO Dan Hesse. Matt Carter will remain as head of Boost Mobile, but will report to Schulman which means that Virgin will be slightly above Boost on Sprint's new depth chart. The deal is expected to close in the 4th quarter of this year or in early 2010.
1. Arielnyc2006 posted on 20 Oct 2010, 01:43 0 0
This kinda makes sense, and it would be cool if Virgin would offer Sprint phones instead of the limited selection they offer now
3. dirty j harry posted on 28 Jul 2009, 22:02 0 0
YES WHAT A GOOD IDEA FOR A COMPANY THAT IS LOSEING MILLIONS!!!! EVERY QUARTER TO BUY A COMPANY IN SUCH DEBT WAY TO GO SPRINT!!! IT LOOKS LIKE BANK RUPT IS COMMING SOONER
7. dirty j harry posted on 29 Jul 2009, 09:53 0 0
WHAT HAVE YOU BEEN SMOKING COME DOWN YOUR HIGH AND EXCERPT THE TRUTH!!!
10. craggie4ever posted on 30 Jul 2009, 12:32 0 0
Am I spotting some denial??? I think I am! :DDDD
2. nzilliox posted on 28 Jul 2009, 14:11 0 0
I hope they increase the coverage area and some new phones would be nice as well.
8. prostatus posted on 29 Jul 2009, 10:31 0 0
I agree that some new phones would be nice, and I wonder if that means Sprint acquired Helio too because Virgin Mobile owns Helio. Both VMUSA and Helio operate using Sprint's PCS network... soooo IDK.
4. MrMojo posted on 28 Jul 2009, 23:07 0 0
Too bad Sprint still uses CDMA technology instead of GSM (SIM cards). Most every other country outside the USA uses GSM as it's so convenient using SIM cards in phones! What's the point of staying with a company that locks you in their phones in a proprietary phone technology that no one really uses??!
9. prostatus posted on 29 Jul 2009, 10:34 0 0
SIM cards are convienient but if your phone gets stolen, someone can just easily put their SIM in your device and is good to go. A CDMA ESN can be locked from use if its lost or stolen. In my opinion, CDMA is far more reliable and powers a much stronger (not to mention faster download speed and more coverage regardless of what some GSM stateside companies claim) 3G network. It also costs more to make a CDMA device, which in my experience , my CDMA phones have outlasted my GSM phones over 2-3x as long.
5. B_Adams posted on 28 Jul 2009, 23:37 0 0
Doesn't Virgin Mobile Use Sprint Towers Anyway?-I'm Not Sure; But I Think I Seen That.