x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Hidden picShow menu
  • Home
  • News
  • AT&T Moto X will run you $575 without a contract, $629 for the 32 GB version

AT&T Moto X will run you $575 without a contract, $629 for the 32 GB version

AT&T Moto X will run you $575 without a contract, $629 for the 32 GB version
AT&T has confirmed that the Moto X will cost $575 without a contract, and that's for the 16 GB version. The 32 GB one will run you $629, or in line with all current flagship phones, just like the $200 contract price for the basic Moto X jibes with what we are used to pay for the latest and greatest.

This is one area the Moto X definitely differs from the Nexus line concept, but let's not forget that the Nexus 4 is $299 only at the Play Store, and if there is a Moto X sold there by year-end, as we heard yesterday, it is likely to command a lower price than the one sold by carriers.

115 Comments
  • Options
    Close





posted on 02 Aug 2013, 08:03 31

1. gazmatic (Posts: 795; Member since: 06 Sep 2012)


fail

just get a htc one

or a nexus 4

posted on 02 Aug 2013, 08:14 5

6. boosook (Posts: 1442; Member since: 19 Nov 2012)


I'd rather take the moto x than the htc one or gs4, even at the same price. There are reasons, of course. Just keep in mind that we're not all equal and what is the best product for your needs and taste might not be the best product for everyone else.

posted on 02 Aug 2013, 09:00 21

38. techspace (Posts: 1036; Member since: 03 Sep 2012)


the moto x is not a bad phone and yes, every person is different...
but that doesn't justify the pricing of the moto x...
it should have been cheaper

posted on 02 Aug 2013, 09:10 9

42. jove39 (Posts: 1921; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)


Just a price fail

posted on 02 Aug 2013, 09:13

44. InspectorGadget80 (unregistered)


HTC ONE 700

posted on 02 Aug 2013, 09:16 9

47. jubin.mathai (Posts: 15; Member since: 11 Jun 2013)


Yes, considering the specs of the phone, it's way more costly.

posted on 02 Aug 2013, 09:32 3

57. flynfree (Posts: 374; Member since: 09 Jun 2013)


I think, you are still using low end phone's and want a mid range one.
Picking Moto X than S4/hTc One is no brainer.

posted on 02 Aug 2013, 09:46 2

66. Captain_Doug (Posts: 1033; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)


It could still be cheaper. Motorola may sell them unlocked for less or the Google Play edition may be less. Regardless, I think this is exactly why T-mobiles JUMP program will be a success. Also, I'm still willing to pay a premium price for everything else this phone offers because I don't need a quad core processor. All the check boxes are ticked.

posted on 02 Aug 2013, 09:46 4

67. Shatter (Posts: 2036; Member since: 29 May 2013)


How is it a no brainer? The Motorola X is the same specs as last years flagships from mid 2012 and their pricing it as a brand new flagship.

posted on 02 Aug 2013, 10:00

77. flynfree (Posts: 374; Member since: 09 Jun 2013)


Then stick to it.
2012 is past, 2013 is the present.

posted on 02 Aug 2013, 10:22

84. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)


Except that T-Mo isn't going to be stocking the X in the immediate future, so no X from Jump.

posted on 02 Aug 2013, 13:40 1

101. Diazene (Posts: 129; Member since: 01 May 2013)


and an availability one too

posted on 02 Aug 2013, 14:15 1

103. whysoserious (Posts: 318; Member since: 20 Jul 2012)


I think you meant Picking s4/htc over moto x is a no brainer.

posted on 03 Aug 2013, 01:03

112. CX3NT3_713 (Posts: 2285; Member since: 18 Apr 2011)


Motorola your drunk!!! Go home...... lol reallt!??? For a midrange phone lmao cool.story

posted on 03 Aug 2013, 09:27

113. Dro (Posts: 27; Member since: 23 Dec 2009)


Exactly!! I mean, they announced the Droid mini for $99 on contract with Verizon. The Droid Mini and the Moto X are the same specs wise apart from the 4.3" screen on the Mini vs the 4.7" on the X.But, with both screens having the same resolution the Mini has the higher ppi, so I can't see why they're selling the X for $100 more than the Mini. It makes no sense.

posted on 02 Aug 2013, 08:05 15

2. blahb (Posts: 48; Member since: 16 May 2012)


Samsung Galaxy S 4 from the Play Store would be a better option at that price.

posted on 02 Aug 2013, 08:10 22

3. Rorschach (Posts: 83; Member since: 26 Apr 2013)


$575/629 for this? You're better off getting the S4/One Google ed.

posted on 02 Aug 2013, 10:59 4

91. GTR722 (Posts: 267; Member since: 20 Oct 2012)


The price is insane, Google/Moto are on crack !! You can get an Xperia Z for $500 in Amazon.

posted on 02 Aug 2013, 08:12 2

4. jharkem17 (Posts: 21; Member since: 29 Jul 2013)


A bit pricey..but still better than the S4 and One..in everything.

posted on 02 Aug 2013, 08:23 9

11. pellegrini (Posts: 84; Member since: 14 Jun 2012)


Define better?

posted on 02 Aug 2013, 08:30 2

18. jharkem17 (Posts: 21; Member since: 29 Jul 2013)


better in 1.design..simple yet striking..samsung is so cheap. htc one is trying hard to be attractive--fail!

solid 2.performance..check out other sites to see how motoX put sammy's top dog to shame.

posted on 02 Aug 2013, 08:32 5

19. WHoyton1 (Posts: 1635; Member since: 21 Feb 2013)


how better? are you diluted, worst processor, worst screen, worst design than one, worst OS version than s4....
nope not better...

posted on 02 Aug 2013, 08:38 2

23. jharkem17 (Posts: 21; Member since: 29 Jul 2013)


dude when you have problems with your android phones..I took them..been troubleshooting samsung, bb, htc, zte, windows..

samsung is the best in the world atleast in paper.

am I diluted? guess what.

posted on 02 Aug 2013, 08:39 2

25. dexter_jdr (Posts: 1163; Member since: 28 Jun 2012)


moto x has a better cam tech than htc 4ultrafail

posted on 02 Aug 2013, 09:22 6

51. flynfree (Posts: 374; Member since: 09 Jun 2013)


You're dreaming!
The only high end with this phone is the price.
I better use my gnexus with 4.3 jb and removable battery.

posted on 02 Aug 2013, 09:38 5

58. greyhulk (Posts: 160; Member since: 30 Jun 2010)


Spoken like someone who has never owned either a GS4 or an HTC One.

Go ahead and pay premium price for your mid-range MotoX. The rest of us will buy real phones.

posted on 02 Aug 2013, 09:39 4

59. jdoee100 (Posts: 334; Member since: 04 Jun 2013)


I don't care about Moto X's performance. Moto's small chip can not beat S4's raw horsepower. Moto's bringing a knife to a gunfight.

posted on 02 Aug 2013, 09:39 1

60. greyhulk (Posts: 160; Member since: 30 Jun 2010)


*deluded

posted on 02 Aug 2013, 09:41 1

63. jharkem17 (Posts: 21; Member since: 29 Jul 2013)


C L O C K S P E E D .

posted on 02 Aug 2013, 09:42

65. jharkem17 (Posts: 21; Member since: 29 Jul 2013)


im dreaming..you are dreaming..

wake up.

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories