Join the discussion
RogueBolo
RogueBolo
Arena Apprentice
• 1w ago
↵stevoo13 said:

A reminder that in DXOMARK the iPhone 17 PM destroys the Pixel 10 Pro XL, 168 vs 161. You know in case anyone was interested in objective data…

A 4% difference isn't destroying anything and is within the margin of error. Enjoy your walled prison and the dull, flat, over-exposed images.

Like
5
Quote
ErikOiseaux
ErikOiseaux
Arena Master
• 1w ago
↵stevoo13 said:

This website is becoming a colossal joke…might as be called anti-Apple arena. The best part is the reviewer buying into the obvious bias and makes sweeping statements with zero technical backing.


Do better Android Arena…or else you’re going to become a steaming mess of like-minded Apple-haters all feeding into the same narrative.

I'm team iOS. But from the sample photos it’s clear that pixel did a better job. Somehow I get better results doing it myself, but in this instance pixel did better job overall. And if it’s what others will get as results in the wild, I say don’t buy the iPhone if you want better photos and get pixel instead.

Like
Quote
stferrari
stferrari
Arena Apprentice
• 1w ago
↵TuGa121 said:

In contrast, the iPhone is significantly superior. While you may have your opinion, I base mine on DXOMARK Professionals, whereas you base yours on Here. It is interesting to note that individuals who dislike Apple often express their dislike for the iPhone by simply clicking on the option against it. We all know there are many more Fan Girls users than Apple phone users here.

DXOMARK rated the Pixel 20 Pro XL with a higher csmera score and a higher screen quality score so its not my opinion its their, as you say, professional opinion so stop deflecting. If you live by the sword yoy die by the sword.

Like
Quote
ErikOiseaux
ErikOiseaux
Arena Master
• 1w ago
↵Crispin_Gatieza said:

Whatever happened to blind comparos like y'all used to do? Or are y'all just enjoying the flame wars?

I think it’s mostly for views. I’ve noticed that if it’s praising iPhones - those articles - nothing but crickets. If you show iPhones failing - then this happens.


I prefer that Apple sees this and do better. The more articles like this in the wild the less people buy, the more Apple will be forced to step it up.

Like
2
Quote
IHateFanGirls
IHateFanGirls
Arena Apprentice
• 1w ago
↵TuGa121 said:

Interestingly, your statement aligns with the findings of DXOMARK. The 17 Pro outperformed the Pixel 10 Pro XL and S25U in various tests. However, it is common for FAN GIRLS not to admit the truth despite the consistent performance of the iPhone. They are FAN GIRLS, what do you expect?

You sound like a FAN GIRL 🤣

Like
6
Quote
TuGa121
TuGa121
Arena Master
• 1w agoedited
↵stferrari said:

DXOMARK rated the Pixel 20 Pro XL with a higher csmera score and a higher screen quality score so its not my opinion its their, as you say, professional opinion so stop deflecting. If you live by the sword yoy die by the sword.

Once again you must be in LA LA land they hove not tested the screen on the 17 pro yet and camera iphone 17 pro scored 168 to pixel 163 so dude just stop your making zero sense here.

Like
Quote
TuGa121
TuGa121
Arena Master
• 1w ago
↵IHateFanGirls said:

You sound like a FAN GIRL 🤣

Trust me not at all. Nice name tho.

Like
1
Quote
J2017
J2017
Arena Master
• 1w ago
↵stevoo13 said:

This website is becoming a colossal joke…might as be called anti-Apple arena. The best part is the reviewer buying into the obvious bias and makes sweeping statements with zero technical backing.


Do better Android Arena…or else you’re going to become a steaming mess of like-minded Apple-haters all feeding into the same narrative.

Lol, you're funny is site super pro Apple.

Like
1
Quote
ssallen
ssallen
Arena Apprentice
• 1w agoedited
↵TuGa121 said:

No, I prefer consistency. I do not change from one source to another simply because they claim that my device is superior. In this case, I stick to the same source, DXOMARK, because it is older and more reliable. DXOMARK has released a report indicating that the Huawei Pura 80 Ultra surpasses the iPhone in terms of camera performance. I do not seek alternative sources that may contradict my findings. I adhere to a single source of information.

Unlike FAN GIRLS, I do not switch to what is convenient for me.

Except you dont even understand what you are reading so you make whiny passionate posts in places that just make you seem less capable of understanding nuance. The DxoMark tests in PHOTO quality were pretty much a dead heat between Pixel and iPhone. Its video where iPhone took ground. PhoneArena's test isnt lab condition its *subjective* about what people *like* to see. DxoMark is lab tests looking for precision to a standard. Pixel consistently wins subjective tests and usually objective as well. Its good to see iPhone finally caught up in lab tests but their urine colored hue their camera produces offends a lot of people. Its just facts. Maybe post less moronic garbage and actually do some reading.

Like
Quote
stferrari
stferrari
Arena Apprentice
• 1w agoedited
↵TuGa121 said:

Once again you must be in LA LA land they hove not tested the screen on the 17 pro yet and camera iphone 17 pro scored 168 to pixel 163 so dude just stop your making zero sense here.

I didn't say 17 pro I said 17 pro max. Try reading what I wrote. The Iphone 17 ProMax scored 161 vs the Pixal's 163 and the Pixal 10 Pro XL is rated 161 or #1 in their camera ratings. Yes we will have to see where the Iphone 17 Pro Max falls but given the IPhone 16 Pro Max ranked 26th, I do t think you are going to see it beat the top 5 phones in display quality.

Like
Quote
FCC OKs Cingular\'s purchase of AT&T Wireless