A discussion is a place, where people can voice their opinion, no matter if it
is positive, neutral or negative. However, when posting, one must stay true to the topic, and not just share some
random thoughts, which are not directly related to the matter.
Things that are NOT allowed:
Off-topic talk - you must stick to the subject of discussion
Offensive, hate speech - if you want to say something, say it politely
Spam/Advertisements - these posts are deleted
Multiple accounts - one person can have only one account
Impersonations and offensive nicknames - these accounts get banned
To help keep our community safe and free from spam, we apply temporary limits to newly created accounts:
New accounts created within the last 24 hours may experience restrictions on how frequently they can
post or comment.
These limits are in place as a precaution and will automatically lift.
Moderation is done by humans. We try to be as objective as possible and moderate with zero bias. If you think a
post should be moderated - please, report it.
Have a question about the rules or why you have been moderated/limited/banned? Please,
contact us.
Exactly what I'm thinking from the first time I saw these new xiaomi's. It somehow doesn't matter who came up with this design (actually Poco, not xiaomi), it matters that at the same time as iphones, xiaomi decides to implement it for the first time. Poco somehow does not equal xiaomi, so it's first time xiaomi is implementing the poco design. And on top of that the name, why the same names as iphone.
Totally shameless coping, so even if it's not bad design and even looks better than iphones, it's very bad timing. Getting these xiaomis now means like getting a worse phones than they are, and they makes iphones step up like a "real deal" phones, even when they look worse.
Which Poco phone? Is it exactly the same? Anyways at least we both agree why Xiaomi completely skipped the number 16 this year and named their whole line-up exactly the same.
Also watches look similar ... it's normal to copy what works well, and if you think that they were studied months before and they came out at nearly the same time... well doesn't look that one copied the other.
I'm not defending Xiaomi, Apple neither, it's just how it works.
Things that are NOT allowed:
To help keep our community safe and free from spam, we apply temporary limits to newly created accounts:
Exactly what I'm thinking from the first time I saw these new xiaomi's. It somehow doesn't matter who came up with this design (actually Poco, not xiaomi), it matters that at the same time as iphones, xiaomi decides to implement it for the first time. Poco somehow does not equal xiaomi, so it's first time xiaomi is implementing the poco design. And on top of that the name, why the same names as iphone.
Totally shameless coping, so even if it's not bad design and even looks better than iphones, it's very bad timing. Getting these xiaomis now means like getting a worse phones than they are, and they makes iphones step up like a "real deal" phones, even when they look worse.
Which Poco phone? Is it exactly the same? Anyways at least we both agree why Xiaomi completely skipped the number 16 this year and named their whole line-up exactly the same.
Also watches look similar ... it's normal to copy what works well, and if you think that they were studied months before and they came out at nearly the same time... well doesn't look that one copied the other.
I'm not defending Xiaomi, Apple neither, it's just how it works.
Just saw the Harmony OS. I thought it was just the naming scheme, but the OS is also a blatant copy of iOS! Like seriously, copy paste!!!
if you’re still denying that xiomi is copying Apple you have to absolute dunce.
Unfortunately, China is leading in EV technology. And you do realize, a sixth-generation fighter jet is not something you copy... 😅