Pocket money for Carly? T-Mobile sells rights to 7200 towers for $2.4 billion
not to offer some level of LTE service. T-Mobile has previously said that it is currently testing LTE service and would start building out its LTE network in 2013.
The deal is expected to close in the fourth quarter. Crown Castle is said to have beaten out American Tower Corp. and Global Tower Partners to win the deal. Crown already owns 30,000 towers on which carriers like AT&T or T-Mobile lease space to put up their cellular radios. Considering that T-Mobile has already committed itself to spending $4 billion over the next three years to build out a 4G LTE pipeline, the transaction goes a long way in helping the carrier fund its future plans.
1. NokiaLumia920 (Posts: 28; Member since: 29 Sep 2012)
At least TMobile is in a better state than the stupid CEO ruling Sprint.
2. spoonb1 (Posts: 77; Member since: 02 Jan 2010)
I wonder if the 4 billion they plan to spend is the same 4 billion paid from at&t... Makes you wonder if they might finally align the frequencies in use... And finally get the iphone in 2014 lol
5. cheeseycheeser (Posts: 413; Member since: 24 Mar 2011)
Now for 3G in my area ;)
But I'd be willing to put up for it anyway BECAUSE DEAR LORD THE PRICES.
6. mas11 (Posts: 1034; Member since: 30 Mar 2012)
Desperate, Verizon's Lte network is greater than all other networks combined.http://network4g.verizonwirele
15. mas11 (Posts: 1034; Member since: 30 Mar 2012)
Yes, it's sad to see people down vote the facts, I mean for god's sake T-Mobile practically begged the FCC to join AT&T. Btw Verizon is ranked as the top network in the U.S. by J.D. Power and Associateshttp://www.phonearena.com/news
16. nwolfe90 (Posts: 1; Member since: 30 Sep 2012)
you can have fun paying your 100 dollar bill and then additional fees if you go over you data plan.
17. mas11 (Posts: 1034; Member since: 30 Mar 2012)
Yeah I actually only pay $67/month since I'm on a family plan with some friends and I have 4GB/month (for just myself) so I'll stick with the best network in America, hell it would cost me more to switch to T-Mobile (a much less developed network).
7. richardyarrell2011 (banned) (Posts: 510; Member since: 16 Mar 2011)
I left Verizon for Tmobile and I'm here to tell you that Tmobile and it's GSM HSPA PLUS 42MPS network simply s**ts all over Verizon and it's CDMA LTE NETWORK. My Samsung Galaxy Nexus on Verizon had dreadful Dbm/asu which meant hideous signal strength and crappy reception. My Galaxy S3 on Tmobile bitch slapped my Verizon Galaxy Nexus senseless. In New York City Tmobile rules Verizon is overrated and overpriced with it's battery draining bloatware filled devices.. Tmobile to the end....
8. Berzerk000 (Posts: 4239; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)
Eh, Verizon's LTE speeds tend to be about the same speed, if not higher, than HSPA+ 42. Also, LTE uses a lower frequency than HSPA+, so it has better building penetration. It might be better in your area, but those are just general facts. The Galaxy Nexus on Verizon was known to have antenna issues, so that isn't really a good device to base your stance off of.
I would've switched to Verizon a couple years ago, if the closest LTE location to me wasn't 60 miles away, and if I didn't know the benefits of being on a GSM network; like being able to basically buy any global device, pop your sim card in, and have it work with 4G. That gave me reason to stick with T-Mobile.
And it helped me in the long run also because now Verizon got rid of their unlimited data, and T-Mo just released their truly unlimited data plan, so it works out better I guess. But T-Mobile is really sketchy in my area, I either get Edge, 4G, or nothing. No 3G at all, which is kind of weird.
9. g2a5b0e (Posts: 3577; Member since: 08 Jun 2012)
The reason you get no 3G is because T-Mobile upgraded their 3G network to 4G rather than use a completely different technology. What it simply means is that depending on where you are, you'll always get one or the other, but not both.
10. Nadr1212 (Posts: 741; Member since: 22 Sep 2012)
I hope Tmobile doesn't get distroyed doing this, kinda like how AT&T WIRELESS, NOT AT&T, failed and discontinued
11. timeformiles (Posts: 7; Member since: 26 Apr 2012)
to me they should just keep building their HSDPA+ and then wait till LTE II or what ever its gonna be called to come out and then start building on top of that. unless you need LTE in before you can build LTE II then they need to spend alot more money on that.
12. cmikeh2 (Posts: 26; Member since: 09 May 2012)
T-Mobile did say when it announced its plans for the LTE network that it was going to start at a later LTE revision than the other carriers, so by the end of 2013 T-Mobile will have the same or better quality of LTE.
14. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10221; Member since: 14 May 2012)
Well T-Mobile already said they would be deploying LTE Advanced next year.
LTE Advanced > LTE.
18. RORYREVOLUTION (Posts: 3099; Member since: 12 Jan 2010)
I would love to be on T Mo but sadly there's only EDGE in my area and I'd go crazy.
19. jsjr76 (Posts: 24; Member since: 28 Sep 2010)
It amazes me how many people that didn't go to Notre Dame, recieve an MBA from Cornell and a Masters in science from MIT call one that did stupid. A man that took a dying company, said give me five years, and in four has accomplished several major feats. He launched the first "truly 4G" network, now has LTE, got the iPhone, and has doubled the stock price in 4. He's hardly stupid. Whatay seem stupid to those who may very well be, running a corporation requires doing things that don't always make sense to laymen, but if you have a concept of how a publicly traded company works, you'd understand. People shouldn't get on here and trash people, it's tacky.