Have you seen PhoneArena's gadget-dedicated sister site? Check out MeetGadget.com Close

  • Home
  • News
  • Next gen iPhone being tested in San Francisco?

Next gen iPhone being tested in San Francisco?

Posted: 29 Nov 2009, 00:07, by Alan F.

Categories: Bookmark

Share this page:

Discuss 40

This article contains unofficial information.

Next gen iPhone being tested in San Francisco?
Analytics of iPhone commuter app developer Pandav show usage of an unreleased iPhone. The app used was a guide to the San Francisco train system called iBART. The company that provides the anlytical data, PinchMedia, breaks down usage by different devices. The information is reported to developers using identification numbers assigned by Apple. The id iPhone3,1 has been in use and written in Pandav's log since November and does not match up to any currently shipped iPhone model. The last released unit, the iPhone 3GS, is identified by the code 'iPhone2,1'. Pandav has turned this information over to MacRumors. On the latter's web site, it is also reported that the iPhone3,1 id was discovered in the phone's firmware back in August. This is the first time that it has been seen in the 'wild'. The site goes on to add that there are rumors that the next iPhone model will have a multi-core processor to improve performance, and that the new unit could have Verizon compatibility as soon as the middle of next year.

Apple iPhone 3GS Specifications | Review

source: MacRumors

Next gen iPhone being tested in San Francisco?



Share this page:

Discuss40

40 Comments

1. bng posted on 20 Oct 2010, 01:44

Here we go again with Verizon and AT&T users going at it again about the iPhone lol VERIZON FTW haha

2. E.N. posted on 29 Nov 2009, 00:39

Yup, here we go again

4. sinfulta posted on 29 Nov 2009, 02:34

I mentioned awhile ago about Apple releasing an IPhone counterpart that would have compatible CDMA Chipset and be LTE ready but only sold as a Full Retail device in the Apple Store, which would get activated on the carrier of the device that supports the frequencies it has available on it. It would not surprise me if this is what happens and then the customer takes it home to activate on the carrier that will support the device with a plan.

14. artz1986 posted on 29 Nov 2009, 12:09

that would make more sense, because then it would take the burden off of apple to have to keep coming up w/ an updated version every year or so, because it wouldn't be as big a mass market device like the iPhone of today- how many kids would be willing to spend $600-$700+ on a handset...not many

32. YouLostTheGame posted on 29 Nov 2009, 20:06

I personally don't care how the iPhone gets compatible with VZW, as long as the end result is that IT'S COMPATIBLE WITH VZW. The situation you describe doesn't sound like a bad situation. Just as long as one of the companies supports the device. When I upgraded my Storm OS to the last 4.7 one, I was having all kinds of issues with it, and the people at VZW told me it that the ball was entirely in my court, so to speak. They wouldn't help me at the store, and when I called tech, the tech guy said that smartphones are left up to the consumer to figure out, and that VZWs hands were "tied". And we all know RIM is such a hassle dealing with.

3. Literati posted on 29 Nov 2009, 02:06

Multi-core processor... kind of like what it already has.

20. tedkord posted on 29 Nov 2009, 14:52

...

5. DonLouie posted on 29 Nov 2009, 08:14

Maybe this time it'll have multi-tasking

8. *HOVA* posted on 29 Nov 2009, 08:55

I'm still lost on why this is so commonly brought up. I don't see that big of a need, just a battery drainer...

9. dandirk (unregistered) posted on 29 Nov 2009, 09:40

I agree hova... sure there is some downside and limitation to 3rd party apps but the up side of non-multitasking is batt life like you said. Its sort of like GSM vs cdma call/internet at the same time. Some like/need the multi-tasking and some don't. They are just features (like anything else) that each person has to evaluate when choosing a device for their needs.

15. artz1986 posted on 29 Nov 2009, 12:14

yea, that call and data at the same time would be more appreciated by the business kids. 'Take a business call while looking over the numbers that your client emailed you', or, 'Get a call from a contractor, have him send over a picture of the floor plan via mms, while going over it w/ you', that sort of thing..

28. idiotwind13 posted on 29 Nov 2009, 16:51

Really dude? You wouldn't use Pandora in the background while checking email and web browsing? How about a exercise route tracker like Cardio Trainer? Use your MP3 player while playing a game? No multi-tasking = absolute deal breaker. Way more so than talking and web browsing. My battery still lasts a day with some multi task useage, and it would be a huge annoyance for me to not be able to do it.

35. VSS_55 posted on 30 Nov 2009, 00:22

it seriously annoys me that apple fed people that total load of B.S. and they bought it. muiltitasking does NOT have that drastic effects on battery life. My storm did it with only marginal diffrence, my ancient i730 did it too, and while THAT already had crappy battery life it didnt adversly effect it. (these are both assuming i wasnt running something in the backround that was downloading data every 5 seconds.)

36. CRICKETownz posted on 30 Nov 2009, 11:31

Wow...seriously? Checking email or web browsing while having Pandora going? That's called ADD. Dude...slow down..chill out. Your phone won't evaporate. Bet this is the same guy that goes into the store complaining about his phone freezing/powering down a lot.

38. YouLostTheGame posted on 30 Nov 2009, 15:34

What's so extraordinary about listening to internet radio while doing something else? You're telling him to slow down? That isn't any kind of reason to "slow down". Why don't you try telling the people on here that insist on taking calls while being on the internet or checking email. Last time I checked having music on in the backround while accomplishing another task wasn't out of the ordinary.

6. jundibasam posted on 29 Nov 2009, 08:38

This isn't anything new, i don't understand what the big deal is. Verizon will almost be assured to get the iphone sometime in the second half of next year and that has already been widely reported.

17. DonLouie posted on 29 Nov 2009, 12:37

I don't think anything is assured in the wireless industry

18. E.N. posted on 29 Nov 2009, 14:14

Yeah, neither Apple nor Verizon has confirmed anything yet. I don't know where you get your information from.

21. macron2000 posted on 29 Nov 2009, 14:56

Besides, VZW is notorious for putting the Veto on devices if the platform is too open. Putting carrier restrictions on the Iphone is probably not something that Apple would welcome, nor customers for that matter. So nothing is certain when it comes to Verizon and handsets.

23. johnolesen posted on 29 Nov 2009, 16:11

yeah thats why we just released two OPEN SOURCE OPEN PLATFORM Android devices. We dont like open platforms..exactly right

Want to comment? Please login or register.

All content (phone reviews, news, specs, info), design and layouts are Copyright 2001-2012 phoneArena.com. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part or in any form or medium without written permission is prohibited!
Privacy | Terms of use

Close

We are hiring Contributing Authors (Worldwide)!


PhoneArena is looking for new Contributing Authors.
The main task to be executed is to write mobile-related articles a few times a month. If you are passionate and extremely knowledgeable about mobile technologies, then this message is for you!


Click here for more details how to apply.
or
Continue to your destination page.


You can always view the available positions from the Jobs link in the site footer.