x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Hidden picShow menu
  • Home
  • News
  • LG G3 specs and features officially showcased at a "secret" event in South Korea

LG G3 specs and features officially showcased at a "secret" event in South Korea

LG G3 specs and features officially showcased at a
The LG G3 leaks are just non-stop, though we wouldn't categorize what we have here as a leak per se. Instead, it would appear that LG basically revealed its new G3 flagship at an alleged "secret" pre-announcement event at a Korean retailer, or so our tispter claims. This means that both specs and features are now public knowledge, though do keep in mind that LG has a knack for differentiating its home/away versions of its flagship, so specific changes may still happen.

Anyway, let's talk specs. As expected, the highlight of the LG G3 will be its 5.5-inch, 1440 x 2560 (QHD) pixel resolution screen, which will provide the super-crisp, 538 pixels per inch. Also as expected, the relatively big screen doesn't automatically mean a giant device -- instead, the G3's footprint is almost identical to that of the 5.2-inch Sony Xperia Z2, considering its dimensions of 146.3 x 74.6 x 8.9 mm. 

The rest of the specs include a quad-core Snapdragon 801 and 3GB of LPDDR3 RAM, 32GB of internal storage (no info on microSD slot), and a 13-megapixel rear shooter with the company's improved Optical Image Stabilization +, along with a 2.1-megapixel front-facing cam with an "enhanced selfie mode". It would also appear that we were right in assuming that LG is planning on integrating a laser auto focus assist beam into the body of the G3, which will supposedly deliver fast focus even in low light scenarios. Lastly, keeping the lights of the Android 4.4 KitKat-based handset on is a 3000 mAh cell.

Thanks for the tip!

125 Comments
  • Options
    Close





posted on 21 May 2014, 10:06 24

1. quakan (Posts: 1395; Member since: 02 Mar 2011)


I have to admit, that phone looks good.

posted on 21 May 2014, 10:08 11

2. Ashoaib (Posts: 3229; Member since: 15 Nov 2013)


Yeah, it is looking good... bit close to oneplus1... specs are also quite impressive unlike boring out dated apple's specs

posted on 21 May 2014, 10:10 2

3. AstronautJones (Posts: 303; Member since: 01 Aug 2012)


Agreed. Looks like a beast. Still will wait for s5 prime, m8 prime to compare.
All 3 should be winners

posted on 21 May 2014, 10:13 16

6. quakan (Posts: 1395; Member since: 02 Mar 2011)


That last part...why lol?

posted on 21 May 2014, 10:20 2

15. ihavenoname (Posts: 1693; Member since: 18 Aug 2013)


He's comparing the fruit to the G3 (because he wrote apple small). G3 is fine device, but you can have many hundred apples with the price, G3 is not nutritious and you can't have it as red nor green. Also, apple recharges you.

posted on 21 May 2014, 10:20 1

16. Jason2k13 (Posts: 1283; Member since: 28 Mar 2013)


who cares, its funny lol

posted on 21 May 2014, 10:32

21. amiroomg (Posts: 19; Member since: 07 Dec 2013)


i think most compate is btw m8 prime and g3 ..
maybe note 4 will be best choice for sami in second half the year.

posted on 21 May 2014, 10:55 1

29. Mxyzptlk (unregistered)


Outdated and yet the latest iPhone continues to be more relevant than most flagships released right now.

posted on 21 May 2014, 11:04 3

32. CoastCity (Posts: 257; Member since: 07 Mar 2014)


funny is that moto on the window shop "just watch - the end"

posted on 21 May 2014, 11:28 2

35. Zeeya (Posts: 325; Member since: 17 Mar 2013)


apple specs? haha...

posted on 21 May 2014, 11:39 1

39. Tsoliades (Posts: 228; Member since: 22 Dec 2012)


With new phones as good looking as these, I'm not worrying too much about the cancellation of the Nexus line.
As long as manufacturers keep making good-looking phones with on-screen buttons with no ugly logos, I'll be fine.

posted on 21 May 2014, 11:58 3

43. jrod78414 (Posts: 102; Member since: 18 Dec 2013)


say what angel dust have you doing bOSS

posted on 21 May 2014, 12:04

44. Aploine (Posts: 437; Member since: 24 Oct 2013)


LOL LG did it again. Remember that one for G2 "don't touch only the front, touch the the back also"?

posted on 21 May 2014, 12:14

47. Nikolas.Oliver (banned) (Posts: 1574; Member since: 01 Jul 2012)


Still plastic mate

posted on 21 May 2014, 13:11 2

55. greatoneiw (Posts: 41; Member since: 08 Apr 2014)


now that they raised the bar for screen even 4.7 iphone 6 seems boring to me

posted on 21 May 2014, 13:40 4

60. LGisgood (Posts: 833; Member since: 23 Jun 2012)


PLASTIC IS GOOD & BETTER FOR A SMARTPHONE!

METAL IS NOT GOOD !

posted on 21 May 2014, 14:00

66. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 4888; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)


Crap this phone is looking extremely delicious...

posted on 21 May 2014, 14:05

69. LGisgood (Posts: 833; Member since: 23 Jun 2012)


that's for you! but not for us!

see you in reddot design award for G3!

posted on 21 May 2014, 14:05

70. Supraman21 (Posts: 371; Member since: 09 Jun 2010)


Nope. Metal is better. Go to anandtechs site and they have an article showing that metal is a better choice in material

posted on 21 May 2014, 14:15 5

73. LGisgood (Posts: 833; Member since: 23 Jun 2012)


nope!

metal =WEAK RECEPTION SIGNAL FOR YOUR PHONE!
metal=you may get MORE RADIATIONS from your Phone
metal = not easy to swap your battery

PLASTIC PHONE IS FAR BETTER THAN AN ALUMINUM PHONE

Plastic is lighter and more durable. Doesn’t retain heat or cold

Better a plastic that is flexible than a aluminum that once you bang it will stay that way.
Also metal body is hard on wifi , gps and phone antenna so it cant be the whole body metal, MUST BE partial plastic. see....?

PLASTIC PHONE DOES HAVE STRONGER RECEPTION SIGNAL
PLASTIC PHONE LESS RADIATIONS

do i need to say more....

posted on 21 May 2014, 14:18 4

74. 0xFFFF (Posts: 3806; Member since: 16 Apr 2014)


Anandtech? The same site where that telecom tool Brian Klug used to write on every phone review how removable battery and SD card were bad for phones and made them worse phones?

Even after all the phone manufacturer customer surveys said people wanted both features, with the SD card being the most wanted. As HTC publicly stated, they made SD card expansion part of the M8 because customers demanded it.

Anandtech is just noise now.

posted on 21 May 2014, 14:35

79. joseg81 (Posts: 199; Member since: 15 Jul 2011)


lol use the compare feature on the site please. whether you're an apple fan or google fan the specs don't lie.

posted on 21 May 2014, 14:38

80. LGisgood (Posts: 833; Member since: 23 Jun 2012)


Keep in mind G3 korean is a bit taller & wider than G3 international because of "ANTENNA" "

posted on 21 May 2014, 14:57

85. amats69 (Posts: 1488; Member since: 12 Nov 2012)


I agree..that phone do looks good in front..buti dont like the back..its a bit ugly..imo..

posted on 21 May 2014, 15:00 6

86. ausnote2 (Posts: 84; Member since: 07 Dec 2012)


+plastic more environnentally friendly than metal in making phone
+lighter

plastic is always superior to glass/metal regardless of those diehard fans who keeps putting their head in the sand :)

posted on 21 May 2014, 15:43 2

89. Ashoaib (Posts: 3229; Member since: 15 Nov 2013)


Anandtech is usually out of some other world... they sometime sounds doing review just for the sake of review... I dont trust them and feel them most of the time irrelevent

posted on 21 May 2014, 15:45

90. Ashoaib (Posts: 3229; Member since: 15 Nov 2013)


So should I consider international version dont have an ANTENNA?

posted on 21 May 2014, 15:56 2

93. PunyPoop (Posts: 752; Member since: 18 Jan 2013)


LG you nailed it! It's a pleasure having the G3 in my hands (together with my z2)! Release it LG! CAN'T WAIT!

posted on 21 May 2014, 16:40 1

96. pavsidhu (Posts: 214; Member since: 20 May 2014)


That's only because people don't understand the true potential of Android and are not aware of the major differences that make Android then iPhone

posted on 21 May 2014, 18:07 3

102. Supraman21 (Posts: 371; Member since: 09 Jun 2010)


”Polycarbonate is a poor conductor of heat, which means that with today’s thermally constrained devices, true nominal clockspeed for both CPU and GPU on the SoC will be lower than a phone or tablet that is made of metal such as aluminum and magnesium”
“People often bring up the car analogy to argue that polycarbonate protects a phone or tablet better, but there's no such thing as a crumple zone in a phone. Even the back cover serves a purpose, as antennas are inserted into the back cover in order to have the space for the huge number of frequencies supported. Bending the back cover into the phone is often a dangerous problem, as it will affect the delicate antenna connectors, which are often small, spring-like pieces that make contact with the back cover. This is an issue, as while the metal antenna connectors are elastic to a certain extent, once stretched too far it won’t spring back. One of the most notable examples of this issue can be seen with the Tegra 3 variant of the HTC One X. This variant of the One X would often lose all WiFi and Bluetooth reception due to crushed antenna connectors. Fixing the problem required additional reinforcement to prevent the back cover from bending in too far. As seen in the photo from iFixit's teardown of the Galaxy S4 below, the connectors are small gold-plated nubs that touch parts of the back cover.”
“The safety cell is made to be as rigid as possible to prevent crushing the contents within the safety cell. In short, aluminum is actually more durable, not less. As pointed out back in the iPhone 4 review, the external antennas required by all-aluminum designs can give better reception and performance than internal antennas. Even today, it's possible to see better reception performance from an all-metal device. For example, the Sprint One M8 has a higher effective isotropically radiated power (EIRP) on 1900 MHz CDMA than the Sprint Galaxy S5.”
“Another key advantage is the much higher thermal conductivity of aluminum, which allows for better performance in situations where a device is thermally limited. After all, heat sinks are made of aluminum and/or copper, not polycarbonate or glass. The best example of this can be seen in the comparison between the Galaxy S5 and HTC One (M8) in the T-Rex rundown test, as the frame rate of the One (M8) is significantly higher than the Galaxy S5”

FACTS ARE FACTS. ALUMINIUM IS BETTER THAN PLAY SCHOOL KIDDY TOY PLASTIC

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories