x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Hidden picShow menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Judge sets September 20th date for hearing on preliminary injunctions; Apple is grateful

Judge sets September 20th date for hearing on preliminary injunctions; Apple is grateful

Posted: , by Alan F.

Tags :

Judge sets September 20th date for hearing on preliminary injunctions; Apple is grateful
Apple says the trial was really about values

Apple says the trial was really about values

With the Apple v. Samsung patent trial verdict in the books, the next stage for Apple is to ask the court for injunctions on those Samsung devices that were found to infringe on Apple's patents. Judge Lucy Koh has given the Cupertino based tech firm until August 29th to file a motion with the court. Samsung will have 14 days to respond to the motion after which Apple will have another two days to respond to that filing. Then, on September 20th, Judge Koh will hear from both sides and rule which of Samsung's devices, if any, will be hit with a preliminary injunction.

Meanwhile, Apple released a statement following the verdict saying that the trial was about more than just patents or money. Apple claims that the suit was about values. The company says it values innovation and originality and applauds the court for sendng the message that stealing isn't right. Earlier on Friday, we passed along Samsung's comments which were tinged with an edge as you might expect.
"We are grateful to the jury for their service and for investing the time to listen to our story and we were thrilled to be able to finally tell it. The mountain of evidence presented during the trail showed that Samsung's copying went far deeper than even we knew. The lawsuits between Apple and Samsung were about much more than patents or money. They were about values. At Apple, we value originality and innovation and pour our lives into making the best products on earth. We make these products to delight our customers, not for our competitors to flagrantly copy. We applaud the court for finding Samsung's behavior willful and for sending a loud and clear message that stealing isn't right."-Apple


source: Engadget

82 Comments
  • Options
    Close






posted on 24 Aug 2012, 22:36 25

1. Jay_F (Posts: 236; Member since: 29 Nov 2011)


I'm sure that's what Apple wants everybody to believe.

posted on 24 Aug 2012, 23:09 15

13. Hammerfest (Posts: 383; Member since: 12 May 2012)


exactly, I mean did anyone read "At Apple, we value originality and innovation" and NOT end up laughing their metaphorical a$$es off? EDIT: besides blind apple fanboys of course

from a company who owns more patents that are based on PRIOR ART then any other company in existence, BULL$HI# is the first word that comes to mind

posted on 25 Aug 2012, 00:07 4

22. fanboy (Posts: 38; Member since: 07 Mar 2011)


The company says it values innovation and originality

posted on 25 Aug 2012, 08:31 5

53. neutralguy (Posts: 1152; Member since: 30 Apr 2012)


"we value originality and innovation"

but buys a company to acquire an innovative tech. Apple didn't innovate. It buys something innovative for it's own good. It's not original.

And i really hate the fact that apple's suing a company because the designs of their devices looks similar. I mean, where's the innovation in there?

Originality in icons?
Oh god. As if they are original with those icons. Nokia used gears for representing "settings" way before iPhone was being planned.

What's wrong in this system is the fact that those patents regarding the design of icons were granted to apple..

I would give credit to apple if they used the "pinch to zoom" function. I think they are the ones who started it. But please, stop being a monopolistic company.. Don't sue everyone.. If you love innovation, a competition is needed. Without competition, there's no innovation. Why innovate if no one's challenging your product right?

posted on 25 Aug 2012, 15:30 2

80. Ravail (Posts: 182; Member since: 14 Oct 2011)


Lol i dare Apple to take a shot at Nokia...

posted on 24 Aug 2012, 23:16 6

15. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)


Remember a couple of months back when HTC had its phones stopped at U.S. Customs? It was because of a ban order that the ITC issued. Remember how long sales of the banned HTC phones were suspended? About 2 weeks. 3 at the most. Know what was done to get the phones un-banned? Software changes were installed that were non-infringing.

Guess what Sammy is going to do? They probably will include a list of revised software that is going to be installed on the infringing handsets the day after the motion is filed that does not infringe the patents they were found to infringe.

Anyone with a current Sammy phone on the list of infringing phones might want to seriously consider disabling the OTA update function until this all blows over.

posted on 24 Aug 2012, 22:38 16

2. Savage (unregistered)


The only device which will be found infringing would be the SGS1. Apple names any more devices, it would be bloody unfair.

posted on 24 Aug 2012, 23:37 5

20. Savage (unregistered)


Yeah. That is a shame, Apple getting such trivial patents. An OTA update will set things right. But it is necessary to fix the broken patent system. Apple already has a patent for Google-Glasses like device and they ain't even started working on it.

posted on 25 Aug 2012, 09:32

66. wendygarett (unregistered)


of course not the colour. What i mean is, by the time you press the icon, the animation pop out from the middle of the screen, just like iphone with the faster speed so you won't notice

posted on 25 Aug 2012, 02:29 3

33. Hunt3rj2 (Posts: 396; Member since: 11 Nov 2011)


Dude, HTC phones clearly infringe upon the iPhone. Especially with the original Desire. A chrome earpiece, and metal buttons with engraved channels for LED lighting, totally Apple technology. The Evo LTE, obviously a copy of the iPhone 4s with it's metallic back cover and EVO red kickstand on the back. The One X? HUMONGOUS COPY OF IPHONES MAN. Especially with the all polycarbonate back and lack of any physical buttons beyond power and volume controls.

Remember, it's about values.

posted on 25 Aug 2012, 02:40 2

35. wendygarett (unregistered)


yup htc is a copycat :)

posted on 25 Aug 2012, 04:45 10

38. tedkord (Posts: 13029; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)


Gorgeous....

Now, what were we talking about?

posted on 25 Aug 2012, 05:54 2

40. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)


Not any more. If the HTC phones infringed Apple's patents that were covered under the ITC order, they would still be sitting in shipping containers in U.S. Customs warehouses.

posted on 25 Aug 2012, 06:00 4

41. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)


Hi, Wendy! Let me ask you a question - do you confuse your HTC phone with your collection of iPhones? I mean like when you pick up the HTC and start to use it, are you thinking you are using iMessage to send a text to one of your friends?

posted on 25 Aug 2012, 06:04 2

43. Hunt3rj2 (Posts: 396; Member since: 11 Nov 2011)


http://s3.amazonaws.com/picable/2010/12/02/2440629_Vietnam-Celebrity-Photo--Elly-Tran-Ha-52_400.jpg

Wut

posted on 25 Aug 2012, 06:08 1

44. Hunt3rj2 (Posts: 396; Member since: 11 Nov 2011)


No man, we all know that HTC is infringing on Apple patents. Take a close look at the fact that you can pinch to zoom, and how the overscroll animation, especially in Sense 4, is an obvious iOS copy.

On the hardware side, note the display. The colors are accurate and calibrated, and the glass rolls down to the plastic to make the glass end without an edge. The display has a resolution high enough to be unable to distinguish pixels at most ranges. That's something that only Apple is allowed to do, even if they haven't done it yet.

;)

posted on 25 Aug 2012, 07:22 1

46. wendygarett (unregistered)


Actually not at all :)
I never use the imessage my friend
It just that the pop up animation (i don't really know how to describe that) is so similar compare with iPhone...

posted on 25 Aug 2012, 07:37

47. Ohrules (Posts: 327; Member since: 11 Jun 2012)


http://www.tineye.com/search/46fbcf596fa3d2119bd102e1c94a2ef1f28b4ec9/?pluginver=chrome-1.1

posted on 25 Aug 2012, 07:51 1

50. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)


What pop-up animation are you referring to? Which app is producing the animation? Sense? Or?

posted on 25 Aug 2012, 07:53 4

51. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)


It would seem that Wendy is going to need to post a 'proof-of-life' profile pic... ;-)

posted on 25 Aug 2012, 08:09 2

52. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)


Wendy, I am not trying to push you on what is similar between the HTC and iPhone. Just trying to understand what it is that you think is similar.

posted on 25 Aug 2012, 08:33

54. rf1975 (Posts: 259; Member since: 01 Aug 2011)


HTC was making nice windows phone for Qtek, imate etc. They newer make copycat product like Shamsung. Shamsung makes copycat product almost for all successful product that other company makes.

posted on 25 Aug 2012, 08:36 1

55. MartyK (Posts: 885; Member since: 11 Apr 2012)


Right!, I have to give her a thumb up on the pic alone...lol

posted on 25 Aug 2012, 09:12

63. wendygarett (unregistered)


I don't know what to say, most are follow android but just that part make me feels like using the iphone. Every time I click settings make me feels more like using the iphone

posted on 25 Aug 2012, 09:15 3

64. wendygarett (unregistered)


Im sorry doug, maybe i feel nervous first time using the android. But I will get used to it :)

posted on 25 Aug 2012, 09:17 1

65. remixfa (Posts: 14471; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


unless something's changed, isnt iOS's settings in a light blue/dark blue motif? How does HTCs settings menu remind you of that?

posted on 25 Aug 2012, 10:54

74. ivanko34 (Posts: 617; Member since: 04 Sep 2011)


It is not really justice but protectionism
No chance for samsung to win a trial against apple if the jury are americans

posted on 25 Aug 2012, 11:37

75. Savage (unregistered)


I hope you are being sarcastic.

posted on 25 Aug 2012, 15:14

79. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10457; Member since: 14 May 2012)


I seriously hope you were being sarcastic.

posted on 26 Aug 2012, 00:24

82. Hunt3rj2 (Posts: 396; Member since: 11 Nov 2011)


Note the ;).

Now, what is this sarcasm you speak of?

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories