(Posts: 293; Member since: 07 Oct 2010)
I LOVE webOS. But I think HP should know that they probably have around a thousand developers while Apple has like 60,000 (Estimate).... You get the point right?
Developers aren't partners and they can jump from one platform to another in an instant. Today Apple has that many next year? Maybe more maybe less, maybe none if they really piss them off.
Nonetheless, that has nothing to do with the topic.
BTW...if anyone things otherwise, let me know so i can change my mind and follow yours.
Love you guys! Cheers! xoxoxoxoxoxo
(Posts: 2137; Member since: 06 Jan 2011)
ya... but i think hp is kinda putting themselves in a bad position with microsoft by doing all this webos stuff... microsoft probably saw them as their partner in wp7 before this... but i suppose they have nokia
(Posts: 944; Member since: 09 Nov 2010)
I do think, however, that HP does realize that they need to offer beefy phones. That usually translates to better performance and makes up for poorly coded OS.
The new Pre 2 took a nice step forward, and the Pre 3 should be a nice upgrade as well.
I've used BB, WinMo, Android as well as WebOS and I can vouch for a strong OS in WebOS (maybe not as strong as a standalone OS for a desktop, HP is getting a bit ahead of themselves there).
WebOS needs a revival, and I'm not sure if hardware alone will cut it. As mentioned they need attention from developers and need to be desirable again.
I might go for another WebOS phone down the line, but WP7 intrigues me more right now (they have the desirability factor I mentioned earlier).
(Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)
HP needs a way to compensate for being late to the party as it were. Therefore, they must be as inclusive as possible with their partners.
Whether that is enough to make up for time lost/missed is anyone's guess.
(Posts: 308; Member since: 07 Feb 2011)
I get what this guy is saying. Developers may want to be on apples platform and they may be one of the big players for now, but throwing your weight around, being arbitrary and not explaining yourselves for decisions doesn't create good will toward you.
There is really no advantage for apple being assholes to their developers other than to feel like they can.
(Posts: 3547; Member since: 19 Jan 2011)
At some point, I would think all these criticisms of Apple will be seen in it's product, wouldn't it? Everyone in the industry is either trying to sue them or attacking them in public. It's either true, and Apple will reap what the sow, or everyone is just trying to get headlines. We will see.
As for HP, I got to play around with the last Pre phone at a Verizon store, and webOS is a fun, easy to use OS. So long as they get aggresive but are honest with themselves and don't over reach (see Semperfiv12's post above), they will become a solid player in the mobile industry. I would consider webOS right along side any other OS in a heartbeat if they had handsets I liked.
I love the WebOS system. I think it trumps Android, iOS, and Blackberry hands down, but I am so underwhelmed by the form factor of their devices. Give me a device that is sexy like an iPhone, screen size like a Fascinate, no moving parts, integrated Google Maps & Nav, and Swype included and I would have one.
That said, I'm super excited about the new HP/Palm Tablets on the horizon.
Excuse me Mr. DeWitt but Apple does not care what you think. Now move on.
Where are they now. (unregistered)
Looks like the Apple strategy is working while HP's investments have been for naught, given the fact that after only 45 days they have tossed in the towel. R.I.P. Web/OS. Long Live iOS with it's lack of partners. Really, when your selling a million units a month do you really need to pay someone to be a partner?