A discussion is a place, where people can voice their opinion, no matter if it
is positive, neutral or negative. However, when posting, one must stay true to the topic, and not just share some
random thoughts, which are not directly related to the matter.
Things that are NOT allowed:
Off-topic talk - you must stick to the subject of discussion
Offensive, hate speech - if you want to say something, say it politely
Spam/Advertisements - these posts are deleted
Multiple accounts - one person can have only one account
Impersonations and offensive nicknames - these accounts get banned
To help keep our community safe and free from spam, we apply temporary limits to newly created accounts:
New accounts created within the last 24 hours may experience restrictions on how frequently they can
post or comment.
These limits are in place as a precaution and will automatically lift.
Moderation is done by humans. We try to be as objective as possible and moderate with zero bias. If you think a
post should be moderated - please, report it.
Have a question about the rules or why you have been moderated/limited/banned? Please,
contact us.
The same thing can be said about you. If you're not being aggressive, you would have left it alone, but here you are still going on.
Your mistake is thinking I'm bothered by it. Your mistake is thinking I'm gaslighting when I'm not. You're taking it personal because you didn't understand what hypothetical means. I think the only reason why you're making a big scene about it is because you ultimately don't want to admit that I was right. It's what happens when the ego speaks over the conscious mind. Before you overreact and accuse me of gaslighting, look it up because words can have more than one interpretation.
If this is an open forum, then why are you still getting upset because of something I said?
All I said was freedom of speech. It's not that big of a deal. No one said anything about infringing on anything.
Looks like you're the one who got offended since you're still giving me flack for that one comment where I was speaking hypothetically. There's nothing false about it.
Let's not forget, you are guilty of resorting to ad hominems initially multiple times. You did infer it otherwise we wouldn't be having this discussion. I mean I couldn't care less if you "responded in kind" when it was you who cast the first 🪨.
You're still ⛽💡ing bigtime lol. There is no anger or aggression, you just think if you say it out loud then your false narrative will become true.
No, you're definitely bothered and ⛽💡ing again, and it all stems from the fact that you're embarrassed that your own initial comment exposed your ignorance of OriginOS, and I made it known that was case when I suggested that you learn about it before speaking on it. The only reason why you're bothered is because it was me that made the suggestion. You're making it personal and getting defensive over something some small, and it's because your megalomania won't let you accept the fact that you made a comment out of ignorance.
It isn't that big of deal, but you keep blowing it out of proportion. It's you that's forgetting that this is an open forum, which is why you're still complaining about me responding to your initial comment.
You tried to make it seem like your "freedoms" were being denied, and no one denied you of any of your "freedoms". You're ⛽💡ing again to try and make it look like your "freedoms" have been infringed upon. You're choosing to be overly dramatic over nothing.
You exposed your own ignorance, and in overly dramatic fashion got offended and defensive over a response from me that you actually could benefit from because it means that I am aware of your ignorance, and you've been trying to perpetuate false narratives ever since that I've been exposing and debunking.
Don't try and deflect with false narratives now because you also exposed yourself as starting with the ad hominems, like you did now lol. I inferred nothing, you're just continuing with false narratives because as a way to deflect from the fact that I pointed out a fact of ignorance on your part that you exposed about yourself. Your nerves became so touched about that fact and about the fact that I won't let your false narratives stick that you had to resort to ad hominems first, as I knew you would, of which I know have the right to respond in kind. But I won't at this time because you want to derail the comments section as a method of deflecting from your willful ignorance of not knowing what OriginOS is that I pointed out. I'm having way too much fun about being proven right about you once again to let you derail the comments section into an ad hominems match. You're either going to have to stop responding here to escape the fact of me constantly pointing out that you don't know about OriginOS and resorted to ad hominems because I made that fact know, or continue on and stew in me constantly mentioning it lol.
What part of your initial comment proves that you're ignorant of what OriginOS is. Do I have to shout it for all of the multiverse to hear before you stop being in denial of your own ignorance?
The same thing can be said about you. If you're not being aggressive, you would have left it alone, but here you are still going on with more aggression and ⛽💡 ing. Just let it go if you're not trying to be aggressive.
Your mistake is thinking I'm bothered by it. Your mistake is thinking I'm gaslighting when I'm not. You're taking it personal because you didn't understand what hypothetical means. I think the only reason why you're making a big scene about it is because you ultimately don't want to admit that I was right. It's what happens when the ego speaks over the conscious mind. Before you overreact and accuse me of gaslighting, look it up because words can have more than one interpretation.
If this is an open forum, then why are you still getting upset because of something I said?
All I said was freedom of speech. It's not that big of a deal. No one said anything about infringing on anything.
You first. You see my previous comment and subsequent comments.
Things that are NOT allowed:
To help keep our community safe and free from spam, we apply temporary limits to newly created accounts:
What part of speaking hypothetically did you not get? Do I have to shout it to the heavens or something?
The same thing can be said about you. If you're not being aggressive, you would have left it alone, but here you are still going on.
Your mistake is thinking I'm bothered by it. Your mistake is thinking I'm gaslighting when I'm not. You're taking it personal because you didn't understand what hypothetical means. I think the only reason why you're making a big scene about it is because you ultimately don't want to admit that I was right. It's what happens when the ego speaks over the conscious mind. Before you overreact and accuse me of gaslighting, look it up because words can have more than one interpretation.
If this is an open forum, then why are you still getting upset because of something I said?
All I said was freedom of speech. It's not that big of a deal. No one said anything about infringing on anything.
You first.
Looks like you're the one who got offended since you're still giving me flack for that one comment where I was speaking hypothetically. There's nothing false about it.
Let's not forget, you are guilty of resorting to ad hominems initially multiple times. You did infer it otherwise we wouldn't be having this discussion. I mean I couldn't care less if you "responded in kind" when it was you who cast the first 🪨.
You're still ⛽💡ing bigtime lol. There is no anger or aggression, you just think if you say it out loud then your false narrative will become true.
No, you're definitely bothered and ⛽💡ing again, and it all stems from the fact that you're embarrassed that your own initial comment exposed your ignorance of OriginOS, and I made it known that was case when I suggested that you learn about it before speaking on it. The only reason why you're bothered is because it was me that made the suggestion. You're making it personal and getting defensive over something some small, and it's because your megalomania won't let you accept the fact that you made a comment out of ignorance.
It isn't that big of deal, but you keep blowing it out of proportion. It's you that's forgetting that this is an open forum, which is why you're still complaining about me responding to your initial comment.
You tried to make it seem like your "freedoms" were being denied, and no one denied you of any of your "freedoms". You're ⛽💡ing again to try and make it look like your "freedoms" have been infringed upon. You're choosing to be overly dramatic over nothing.
Now keep seeing all of my comments here.
You exposed your own ignorance, and in overly dramatic fashion got offended and defensive over a response from me that you actually could benefit from because it means that I am aware of your ignorance, and you've been trying to perpetuate false narratives ever since that I've been exposing and debunking.
Don't try and deflect with false narratives now because you also exposed yourself as starting with the ad hominems, like you did now lol. I inferred nothing, you're just continuing with false narratives because as a way to deflect from the fact that I pointed out a fact of ignorance on your part that you exposed about yourself. Your nerves became so touched about that fact and about the fact that I won't let your false narratives stick that you had to resort to ad hominems first, as I knew you would, of which I know have the right to respond in kind. But I won't at this time because you want to derail the comments section as a method of deflecting from your willful ignorance of not knowing what OriginOS is that I pointed out. I'm having way too much fun about being proven right about you once again to let you derail the comments section into an ad hominems match. You're either going to have to stop responding here to escape the fact of me constantly pointing out that you don't know about OriginOS and resorted to ad hominems because I made that fact know, or continue on and stew in me constantly mentioning it lol.
What part of your initial comment proves that you're ignorant of what OriginOS is. Do I have to shout it for all of the multiverse to hear before you stop being in denial of your own ignorance?
Was that supposed to be a statement or a question? Make it make sense. You can shout whatever, but it won't matter much.
The same thing can be said about you. If you're not being aggressive, you would have left it alone, but here you are still going on with more aggression and ⛽💡 ing. Just let it go if you're not trying to be aggressive.
Your mistake is thinking I'm bothered by it. Your mistake is thinking I'm gaslighting when I'm not. You're taking it personal because you didn't understand what hypothetical means. I think the only reason why you're making a big scene about it is because you ultimately don't want to admit that I was right. It's what happens when the ego speaks over the conscious mind. Before you overreact and accuse me of gaslighting, look it up because words can have more than one interpretation.
If this is an open forum, then why are you still getting upset because of something I said?
All I said was freedom of speech. It's not that big of a deal. No one said anything about infringing on anything.
You first. You see my previous comment and subsequent comments.