WSJ confirms a standalone Samsung smartwatch coming this summer
10. sgodsell (Posts: 2283; Member since: 16 Mar 2013)
If you can't use your voice to dial and send text messages. Then it won't be worth it, because the display is only 1.6". To small to type on.
The current Gear watches being tethered would be better then the solo.
2. wargreymon (Posts: 365; Member since: 05 Nov 2013)
Just took 5 years. LG GD910 and Samsung S9110 phone watches came in 2009.
18. KillgoreTroutTime (Posts: 431; Member since: 06 Jan 2014)
And everyone knows that those were perfect devices and sold more units than all Iphones combined.
3. gallitoking (Posts: 4704; Member since: 17 May 2011)
I wonder how many variants of this "solo" will be released
4. 0xFFFF (Posts: 3806; Member since: 16 Apr 2014)
There will be the "Han Solo", celebrating the ancient Han dynasty, of course :)
8. akki20892 (Posts: 3784; Member since: 04 Feb 2013)
Did u see that guy, comment no.6 saying about us. What we have done.
5. akki20892 (Posts: 3784; Member since: 04 Feb 2013)
Wait and watch, still many more galaxy watches to come.....a millions of
22. Peeyushmalik96 (Posts: 73; Member since: 08 Jun 2013)
No doubt the universe is expanding day by day...
6. Topcat488 (Posts: 1229; Member since: 29 Sep 2012)
Haters, hating already? O.o Hey Samsung, i'll take one, WHAT time is it?... Tizen time!
11. AfterShock (Posts: 3698; Member since: 02 Nov 2012)
Why is eco-drive type alternatives being used.
9. nctx77 (Posts: 1006; Member since: 03 Sep 2013)
Sigh yet again..........
This company need to fire it's entire research and development team if they have one. Sammy, people will have a smartphone with or without a smart watch. With that being said, you will never really need to make a call on a watch or have to data/plan to do so. What are you thinking. This is absolutely pointless. What Sammy has is a problem and they are desperately looking a solution.
12. rd_nest (Posts: 1118; Member since: 06 Jun 2010)
You should first consider getting a job before advising the world's largest conglomerate on what they should do. You are grossly mistaken if you think that they need your "expert" opinion. They are making billions of dollars every month simply for the reason that they don't have idiots running the company. Once you make billion a month, come back here to lecture others. Till then, mind your own business.
14. Blazers (Posts: 321; Member since: 05 Dec 2011)
Wow Son, a wee bit sensative there aren't you? If Samsung isn't paying you a little of those billions they make, they should be.
If Samsung wants to waste money developing and marketing a stand alone, it's up to them. But most people that would wear this watch will already have a smartphone, so I don't really see it being successful.
17. willard12 (Posts: 1164; Member since: 04 Jul 2012)
So basically, according to some, their current line-up is useless because it has to be tethered to a smartphone. Now, this one is useless because it doesn't need a smartphone. I guess that's the benefit of creating products with variety and letting consumers decide rather than people who play "analyst" on PA.
19. KillgoreTroutTime (Posts: 431; Member since: 06 Jan 2014)
Agreed. Also, I use a straight talk sim card in my phone, so if I can just take it out and put it in the watch and go.....then sign me up, im buying one. There are plenty of times when I don't want to carry my phone, like when running.
20. iushnt (Posts: 948; Member since: 06 Feb 2013)
@nctx77 They can backup their target markets with proper marketing research for this ptrpduct. What research have u done to say its pointless? If u and Samsung sit it in a room to discuss about gear solo then they can easily show u how they identified needs and targeted markets. What can u show them except your hatred for them? They have many products which the only make to fulfill needs of few customers and not worldwide.
24. TheGenius (Posts: 339; Member since: 06 Mar 2014)
Now people dont need to carry phones when going out.!
Watches are luxurious and if they can do the same thing as our smartphones. . It'll be a pretty succesful idea.
Now I can use a smartwatch when I am outside and have a tablet (which have same specs as the flagship phones but at cheper prices!) At home !
15. jpd514 (Posts: 43; Member since: 08 Nov 2013)
The point is that You will not need an annoying smartphone anymore.
23. GoBears (Posts: 415; Member since: 27 Apr 2012)
Would be great for boarding, sucks carrying a phone on the slopes. Actually would be a lot better than carrying a phone for a lot of outdoor activities.
25. steedsofwar (Posts: 288; Member since: 07 Oct 2013)
I think this is a superb idea. It needs so many efficiently executed components, from battery life, superb speaker and mic capability, intuitive software and hardware to incorporate gesture operations, have the best voice activation possible, maybe a rotating circle rim like the chrono watches which can be used to operate basic functions like select, navigate back or forward etc. All of this has to fit in an attractive premium body.
But this entire process must start at some point, and grow from strength to strength. I give credit to Sammy, despite hating their phones, for pioneering development in this area. Other big manufacturers may produce products n this segment years later only when Sammy has gone through the hoops and iterations of evolving this product and segment for when components and software is optimal for other manufacturers to throw their weight behind it.
TLDR, remember the very first cell phones? They were large, heavy, expensive and software was almost non existent. But now the market is primed for superb, efficient powerful and intuitive products. But someone had to get the ball rolling back then. Motorola? Ericsson? Can't remember.