Uh oh, Building a camera phone with Gingerbread is not wise. They should release it with ICS atleast.
Or even better, they can form partnership with any one OEM and make cameras for their phones.
No, I think GB is better suited for camera than ICS as it's lighter and the resolution of camera's screen is obviously not very high.
GB is lighter, but its too old. People won't fancy buying devices that run a 2 year old OS now.
I guess for cameras users care about functions and not the version of OS, until the competion heats up.
(Posts: 318; Member since: 20 Jul 2012)
True. I think Nikkon's goal here is to simply incorporate google apps and features to their p&s cameras that would be suitable for taking pictures only. So a better version of OS would not be necessary (for now.)
(Posts: 506; Member since: 07 Aug 2011)
At the moment, I really dont think it matters if its 2.3. The fact that you can take a picture and have it instant upload to google+, or post to facebook or instagram is really the idea here.
I dont really think its about google now features or any other ICS/JB features.
Its more about wifi conectivity. 2.3 will be fine. This camera will sell like crazy
(Posts: 336; Member since: 04 Sep 2011)
Even if GB is old it is still miles better than any other camera OS by a land slide. ICS is not necessary for a CAMERA when it didn't bring any new features to the camera app. (Panorama was on gingerbread phones long before ICS)
(Posts: 85; Member since: 08 Jun 2012)
There are a few points to be made on this comment thread...
First, it does not matter what OS is pre-installed, you can usually download whatever you want to a android device, as long as the developers can make the camera work.
Second, to refute my previous point, they probably will use far outdated hardware to run it because it is now cheap and they are not worrying about how fluid angry birds runs... they are primarily thinking of the social aspect of being able to post to facebook etc. As it makes their camera more appealing to use instead of a phone.
Thirdly, I really like the licensing idea for a smartphone as I would love to have a Nikon camera with me on my phone... But they want to sell cameras, and there is not a whole lot of profit to be squeezed out when people are just willing to pay the $199 upgrade per phone.
Plus, I know that I have used my phone as a camera and it has died...voiding its primary use
... so it might be better to keep them separate, as long as they create a good interface for it (I was thinking the home screens could be shooting modes!)
The real benefit of using this is that they do not have to develop their own software, and the can focus on the lenses, which I think is good.
(Posts: 256; Member since: 15 Jun 2010)
I don't see the downside. As long as it can still produce high quality photos, like a point and shoot should, then android is just an added bonus.
(Posts: 115; Member since: 07 Feb 2012)
took them long enough i knew this day would come( i am a nikon fan)
(Posts: 5685; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)
i have an idea!
instead of bringing Android to the Cameras...
let's bring the Cameras to the Android...SMARTPHONES! ;D
HAHAHAH that is exactly what I thought when I seen the article!! I thought android was gonna bring Nikon over and make the camera better for android! LOL
(Posts: 243; Member since: 25 Feb 2012)
I think that it would be nice, but it will not work well. If HTC released a phone with Nikon optics and sensors, Nikon will have operate like chip makers and sell the hardware to HTC who sells the phone to us. I don't think this will work because if HTC screwed it up, Nikon would have to bear partial responsibility. This would require a lot of working together for a minor selling point which could ruin Nikon's reputation.
(Posts: 321; Member since: 01 Jul 2012)
go partner up with htc
although their cameras are quite good but i expect the camera on the one x to be a little better
with nikon htc is unstoppable !
New HTC One X plus , with beats audio and nikon photography
(Posts: 366; Member since: 23 Feb 2012)
i think its time for camera manufacturers like Nikon,Canon etc to step in the smartphone world,so that they can introduce new optics technologies for mobiles.its time to expand.Mobile world is ocean and after some years it will be space.
(Posts: 404; Member since: 23 Dec 2009)
As long as they don't put Android on their DSLRs and keep it on their s**tty point n shoots, i'll be happy.
(Posts: 645; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)
Really is there any place for elitist talk like this?
(Posts: 4360; Member since: 29 Mar 2012)
Let the market decided. Android is a free OS and Nikon might setup their own app store like amazon. If they end up working with Google all the better.
The keyword here is freedom of choice. iOS and Windows are both lock down close platform. Nothing is possible without paying them hundreds of millons dollar.
In fact i surprise it take Nikon this long to realize. Canon and Sony would soon follows.
(Posts: 12; Member since: 21 May 2012)
hmmmm , taking Instagram to the next level? :O
(Posts: 243; Member since: 25 Feb 2012)
There will be a time where everything is smarter than it needs to be.
(Posts: 2059; Member since: 19 Jun 2012)
"Point and shout" that would be funny...