Latest Verizon vs AT&T, T-Mobile and Sprint LTE speeds and coverage maps show T-Mobile's crazy progress
1. AlikMalix (Posts: 6044; Member since: 16 Jul 2014)
Wow, what an eye opener... Very much surprised by AT&T. Another reason to switch from AT&T if they take away my unlimited data (as rumored).
7. QWIKSTRIKE (Posts: 1145; Member since: 09 Mar 2010)
The real question is not who has the fastest LTE speeds, but who has the best overall coverage for use. What good is fast speeds if there is wide open gaps in toatal coverage that TMobile has.
TMobile now needs to get its total coverage up to "speed" out side of urban areas where they are lacking. lol.
16. Techist (Posts: 246; Member since: 27 Jan 2015)
Looks like you just skipped the article and came straight to the comments section to regurgitate old ideas. If you read the article and looked at the slides, you would realize that T-Mobile's coverage is now practically the same as AT&T's (which is very good), both of which are now pretty close to Verizon's coverage. Look at the 2nd slide. I am a T-Mobile customer and 4 months ago while on vacation I was very surprised to discover I had connectivity in a part of the US that has long been known to have no coverage from any of the carriers (Washington Island, Door County, Wisconsin). Things are changing.
18. xq10xa (Posts: 722; Member since: 07 Dec 2010)
Once T-Mobile is actually good. I will switch. Screw AT&T. This isn't enough though. The slides are very misleading. What we need from T-Mobile is consistant speed. Not just one tiny section that as soon as you move out of it's range it's back to 3G. Good on T-Mobile...but they got a long ways to go...I have a feeling once the top 2 start up again T-Mobile will fade into obscurity. The only reason people go to T-Mobile is because of the lower price point and it's network is a tad larger than sprints. Mainly it's because people ain't got that paper.
19. medicci37 (Posts: 1282; Member since: 19 Nov 2011)
It doesn't matter what the article says. Tmobile still has poor or nonexistent coverage in many areas. I noticed this myself when I travel
30. Omarc07 (Posts: 430; Member since: 12 Nov 2012)
same with att u want the best coverage here in cali,vegas arizona ,when you travel VERIZON is the only way to go even att sometimes craps out as a matter of fact tmobile is now offering better coverage in rural parts than att i kno i have att my mom tmobile now tmobile is getting signal in some places in the middle of nowhere were att has COMPLETLY no service and verizon does. i been surprised at how much its improving if it continues like that its deff gonna leave att behind n catch up to verizon.
22. MrElectrifyer (Posts: 3192; Member since: 21 Oct 2014)
Haha, precisely, I kept wondering "did you actually read the article" while rading QWIKSTRIKE's comment...it's just more proof that what T-mobile says is true; their coverage is almost on-par with Verizons and they have the fastest LTE network, plus what Verizon was advertising is BS as T-Mobile pointed out in another ad.
25. QWIKSTRIKE (Posts: 1145; Member since: 09 Mar 2010)
This article speaks about LTE foot print, and speeds from my readings. I don't find anything that suggest overall covergae is better. I do read that over all LTE speed and foot print out paces AT&T and is close to Verizon because of the 700mhz signal
36. Monster.Ninja (Posts: 10; Member since: 10 Jun 2011)
How is the areas leading up to Door County? IE: Manitowoc, Two rivers, Possible Green bay and other surrounding area?
21. AlikMalix (Posts: 6044; Member since: 16 Jul 2014)
You're right, I should have mentioned that if I move - I'd be moving to Verizon. It has better coverage and slightly overall faster speeds from what I see.
27. Brewski (Posts: 358; Member since: 05 Jun 2012)
Yeah, they crushed it in the 3G!!!!
Why is 3G even a part of this?
31. tacarat (Posts: 778; Member since: 22 Apr 2013)
Because phones still run off it. Simple phones and non-lte locations will use 3g until something is upgraded. 2g was in use until recently.
32. fher182 (Posts: 11; Member since: 21 Oct 2014)
unless you are on Verizon where you always get 4G LTE
5. dcgore (Posts: 227; Member since: 24 Feb 2012)
Competition is great. Re AT&T: I am sure all resources were allocated to their Directv acquisition. I expect them to start focusing on their wireless network once again.
6. Punchy506 (Posts: 94; Member since: 10 Jan 2016)
A 3g win is worth as much as a 4g win?
Seems a little biased towards T-Mobile.
9. natypes (Posts: 1095; Member since: 02 Feb 2015)
Well, when you're constantly getting kicked back to 3g I guess it means more.
11. ShadowHammer (Posts: 99; Member since: 13 Mar 2015)
You may notice there's no actual scoring system. Just numbers of awards. People are free to value said awards individually to their heart's content.
Also, it's pretty impressive if you think about how far T-Mobile has come in a short amount of time to compete with the big boys.
That being said, T-Mobile isn't the best choice everywhere. People need to evaluate their own area they live in and decide if the pros outweigh the cons.
17. Techist (Posts: 246; Member since: 27 Jan 2015)
Yes, it is, because when you you go out of a 4g zone and drop into a 3g zone, you are far better off with T-Mobile than with any of the others.
33. fher182 (Posts: 11; Member since: 21 Oct 2014)
Unless you have Verizon and you are always on 4G LTE
10. eDiesel (Posts: 142; Member since: 17 Mar 2012)
Unlimited talk, text and 10Gb of LTE for $20/month.
23. MrElectrifyer (Posts: 3192; Member since: 21 Oct 2014)
Wow, I don't even get half of that data from fido and I'm paying over 3 times more per month...the carriers here in Canada are extremely greedy scumbags.
12. azuleyez (Posts: 6; Member since: 07 Dec 2012)
I'm sorry guys, I can't help but to feel OpenSignal or whatever is getting paid for these 'tests'. I live in a very populated area outside a large metropolitan city, with numerous office buildings, homes, etc....basically, there are a lot of people here. I tried Verizon 2 years ago and the connection was virtually nonexistent. I could not connect to data whatsoever due to network congestion. I switched to AT&T and was very happy with the service and speeds. Two years go by and the problem persists just as badly as it did then. In fact, many of my coworkers simply can't connect to data, and nearly 50% (yes, 50%!!!) of SMS fails to send using multiple devices (iPhone, Galaxy, etc) Calling out is not a problem, but forget anything else. I travel occasionally and had a work phone with Verizon for a short period of time this past summer. I was amazed at how lackluster the data speeds were in airports, convention centers, etc. My AT&T service just blazed away without issue. So tell me, how is it Verizon continues to get all these accolades? Where exactly are these people testing?
24. MrElectrifyer (Posts: 3192; Member since: 21 Oct 2014)
Good observation, just further proof that even "the largest network coverage" has dead spots in some areas.
29. dcgore (Posts: 227; Member since: 24 Feb 2012)
I could not agree more. I live in Manhattan in New York City and just switched back to AT&T. Is it true that VZ has LTE coverage where i live/work? Yes, but what good does it do when i go into a movie theater, my apartment and the supermarket next door and get dropped down to 3g and 1X? Tmobile, simialar story, i can only get HSPA+ in my apartment but that said, it is quite speedy.
I know the whole "strongest LTE signal" thing from AT&T is silly but but it really does matter. Very few times i got full bars with VZ, two to three was the norm. I had to turn VoLTE off because my calls keep dropping. Basically, i was an user on their 3G CDMA network in 2016.