With more and more apps going free, mobile ads are here to stay, says report
Choosing the iTunes Store over Google's Play Store for its seniority, Flurry's analysis reinforces this notion:
As you can see, 90% of all iOS apps are now offered for free, with 6% going for $0.99 a pop while the remainder is split among the higher price tier. “But why?” is a natural thing to wonder, and on this account we have to agree with the report – consumers have made their choice. Yes, ads are annoying, but they're a necessary evil and, as this turn of event exemplifies, preferred over paid content.
What's more, iPad owners really are the cash-cows that iOS devs should be targeting – and they do: according to Flurry, iPad apps on average cost over two and a half times more than iPhone apps, and over eight times as much as Android apps. The company notes that this is, at least partially, due to the higher income class iPad owners usually belong to.
No one likes getting skinned for their money, and the company's research agrees. According to an experiment it ran, many previously paid-for apps went free after significant testing of the price elasticity of demand for their apps. In simpler terms, that's simply how much demand for apps fluctuates according to a price change. The results indicate that an increasing amount of paid apps, even the ones that cost as little as $0.99, have decided to go free after testing the waters and finding out that even a dollar is a significant roadblock to demand. Demand that they can otherwise monetize via ads.
source: Flurry via TechCrunch
1. ilia1986 (unregistered)
Unless you got an Android device, rooted it, and installed Adaway. :D
3. Gaurav008 (Posts: 241; Member since: 20 Jul 2012)
Still,WP doesn't have a good "free and quality" app collection. One of the biggest reasons of the failure of app ecosystem.
5. TheLolGuy (Posts: 463; Member since: 05 Mar 2013)
And so are the companies paying to be able to circumvent them.
Seriously, these ads have to be there. The app is already free. It makes me facepalm so hard when I see so many reviews on the Play Store giving awful ratings just because a free app has ads that I have personally confirmed are placed non-invasively.
When did people begin to believe that money sprouts from trees?
6. icyrock1 (Posts: 241; Member since: 25 Mar 2013)
However, the ads make the developer request permissions that the app normally wouldn't need to have to run. I'd rather they offer an ad free version for a price that doesn't request has many permissions, and a free one that does.
7. TheLolGuy (Posts: 463; Member since: 05 Mar 2013)
That's true, and I'm in the same camp as you. The problem is, the vast majority do not share the same opinion as us. Once apps start coming out free, people aren't so willing to go back to model that prices apps at a few dollars. Because of this, it's just like you said -- sometimes invasive ads and other things that may or may not collect anonymous information about you
It seems a lot of consumers don't understand that there must be tradeoff. They just use the free apps and hope that with enough complaining they'll remove ads.
Some have said it's because they don't want to buy an app for a few dollars then find out it's junk. Well, you can refund your purchase and uninstall the app within a reasonable time, so it's clear that they are being dishonest. We've moved into an era where everything must be a free-to-use model, with anonymous data collecting and ad spamming as a tradeoff. As services become more sophisticated and more costly yet consumers still demand the same great price of $0, we'll be trading more privacy for it. How far will consumers go to keep free services?