Secret Court gives the okay to proposed changes of metadata collection from phones
The President noted that the National Security Agency should not be the holder of that information, rather a private company or other third-party non-government entity should be the gatekeeper to such information.
Moreover, the President ordered that searches of the data should be limited to two “hops” from a person of interest rather than three. These changes were filed with FISC by the Department of Justice, the former granting these changes to begin implementation yesterday.
The details of these orders are still secret. There will be a declassification review on February 17th, at which time, if these filings are declassified, more will be revealed about how much of an overhaul these directives will really be.
The obvious balance (one that may not be achievable) being sought is one that allows the government to detect potential threats without creating unwarranted intrusion. Regardless of the lengths these changes will really go, the debate about government scrutiny over this telephony data is far from over.
source: Ars Technica
3. Aploine (Posts: 126; Member since: 24 Oct 2013)
Because companies are more secure and reliable than a national agency. Logical.
Give them the police too. And the national forces. And the justice. And Guantanamo.
Let bio companies pattent our dna. Why not?
10. Reluctant_Human (Posts: 847; Member since: 28 Jun 2012)
Monsanto can and has already done that.
4. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5593; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)
Lost in the 'changes' is the circumstance that this data vacuuming has not stopped a single terror plot.
5. ZeroCide (Posts: 683; Member since: 09 Jan 2013)
Lets make up a court to give ourselves power.
6. eN16HTMAR3 (Posts: 104; Member since: 08 Oct 2013)
LOL. Your right. The thing the NSA should do is just stop. That easy. If you feel you need to look into phone data. You need a reason to perform the search as well as a warrent. No if's and's or but's. No more collection for the sake of collecting.
7. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5593; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)
It is more like lets use the FISA court to give the stamp of legitimacy to a rogue program. W. had authorized metadata vacuuming after the 9/11 attacks, but it was not subject to any oversight. Then, after getting spanked for going rogue, they run the program UNCHANGED through the FISA court and everything is fine. It took Snowden to pull away the scab and expose the program before even the most modest of changes get made to it.
9. QWIKSTRIKE (Posts: 836; Member since: 09 Mar 2010)
NSA cronies behind the scene grand standing in the public eye as the FISC. Behind the scenes business as usual.