FAA to reevaluate policy on in-flight electronics
Nick Bilton from the NY Times called the FAA last week to once again question their policy of no electronic devices during taxi, take-off, or landing, and received a different response than usual. The deputy assistant administrator for public affairs, Laura J. Brown, said that the FAA has decided to take a “fresh look” at the personal electronics policy.
While this is great news, don’t get too excited that your next flight will laden with electronics from beginning to end because there is a long approval process that each device must undergo before it can be certified to be used during take-off and landing.
Currently airlines have the ability to certify a device, but that process requires testing each version of the hardware on a flight with no passengers. For example, to approve the iPad, an airline must test the iPad, iPad 2, and the new iPad on each type of aircraft it runs in its fleet. As you can imagine, with no customers on these flights, it would become very expensive, very quickly with debatable rewards.
Ms. Brown said, “With the advent of new and evolving electronic technology, and because the airlines have not conducted the testing necessary to approve the use of new devices, the FAA is taking a fresh look at the use of personal electronic devices, other than cellphones, on aircraft.”
So while it is great that the FAA will begin to undergo this testing process on its own, device approval is an arduous, and costly task that probably will not be complete for quite some time.
On the flip side, there could be an advantage for a company to be able to advertise its tablet as FAA approved, so we may see companies with deep pockets, such as Apple, to foot the bill or at least contribute to the costs in order to get their products approved for use during take-off, taxi, and landing.
1. pbui.818 (Posts: 78; Member since: 06 Feb 2012)
So, author is implying Apple wants to use some of their free capital to certify their devices on airplanes?
I'd rather they spent some of that on production facilities for flexible, transparent OLED displays at 2560×1920! Let's have those installed in all airline seats too.
2. Ivan6479 (Posts: 244; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)
I think your kind of jumping the gun there. All the author is saying is that Apple usually doesn't mind forking over money for things that will most likely benefit them in the future, seeing how it will only strengthen their already very influential marketing power. I mean look what marketing did for them on the iPhone 4s. They essentially charged people the same price for a product that was already over a year old, seeing how it was practically the same bs as the iPhone 4, minus the new camera and new lame processor of course and they sold like hot cakes. All thanks to the wonderful marketing power of Apple. Damn iBots! Lol