Nokia 2330 classic User Reviews

Overall user rating

4.8

The overall rating is the average of all user reviews, while the overall alternatives are the ones that has been listed most.

Call quality
2.0
Battery
2.0
Reception
2.0
Display
2.0
Build quality
2.0
Text input
2.0
Everyday usage
2.0
UI speed
2.0
Camera
2.0
Multimedia
2.0
Internet
2.0
Post new review

Please note that each user review reflects the opinion of its respectful author and not of PhoneArena.

rento113 posted on Jun 16, 2012, 4:20 AM
Posts: 1; Member since: Jun 16, 2012

2.0

This phone sucks!

rento113 has owned it for more than one year before publishing this review

I hate my Nokia 2330 beucouse it laggs so much and camera is bulls**t!!!!!!
Never buy this phone its suck.i wont never buy more nokia phones !!!!this was my rewiew to Nokia 2330 good morninng to everybody

Build quality
2.0
Reception
2.0
Call quality
2.0
Internet
2.0
Multimedia
2.0
Camera
2.0
UI speed
2.0
Everyday usage
2.0
Text input
2.0
Display
2.0
Battery
2.0

Cons

  • Evyrything

0 out of 6 people found this review helpful.

Report

Sherm posted on Mar 07, 2010, 1:37 AM

9.0

Nokia 2330 Classic

I have been using my Nokia 2330 Classic for about a month now and I'm happy to say that it's been a good choice. Basically what I wanted was a low-cost Nokia with e-mail and browsing features so that I could check my mail on the go. In this aspect this 'phone has been really great as the menus are extremely straight-forward and Opera Mini and Ovi are both pre-installed. The design of the 'phone belies the low price and one need not feel embarassed to pull out this 'phone in public!On the flip side, the camera is VGA and the memory is not upgradeable but if you like me are after a 'phone with messaging and e-mailing capabilities at a very good price and not a sophisticated camera, music player and 'phone rolled into one, this is a very good choice.

Pros

  • Elegant design.
  • Easily accessible menus.
  • Lowest priced Nokia model with all the basic features one expects from a mobile 'phone nowadays including in-built browser and e-mail.

Cons

  • VGA camera produces grainy images when used indoors.
  • Battery needs recharging every 3 days on average but suitable for light users.

13 out of 15 people found this review helpful.

Report

Auroraelentari posted on Feb 08, 2010, 8:37 PM

3.3

disappointment

Now I wasn't expecting a fancy phone or anything; I just wanted a free upgrade.  Yet, the upgrade is more like a downgrade  :(  First, the reception isn't as good and the SAR rating (amount of radiation going into the brain) is twice that of my old phone (samsung T309).  Except for the improved calculator, this phone lacks some basic things I liked from my old phone.  For example, you cannot adjust the volume of the alarm, and less importantly, I can't get a colorful number display and voice speaking the numbers as I dial.

2 out of 16 people found this review helpful.

Report
You must be a registered user to post a user review
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.
FCC OKs Cingular's purchase of AT&T Wireless