x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Home
  • News
  • Wiretapping is common practice, here's how much carriers charge law enforcement agencies for it

Wiretapping is common practice, here's how much carriers charge law enforcement agencies for it

Posted: , by Victor H.

Tags:

Wiretapping is common practice, here's how much carriers charge law enforcement agencies for it
The American Civil Liberties Union grants us the freedom of being informed lately about... how tracking customers’ phones is pretty much usual business not just for the FBI, but the police. And there are even prices carriers have set for wiretapping, a leaked document reveals.

It all actually seems so mundane that our shock would be completely out of context. In a nutshell, the prices vary and run from $400 on Sprint for market area to $700 a month for Verizon and $500 per target for T-Mobile.

The document reveals that police often tracks phone locations, looks at call logs without having a warrant and instructs officers not to speak about phone tracking to the public.

Here is a summary of the most interesting parts of police dealing with carriers, coming from a report from the police department in Tucson, Arizona:

Wiretaps cost hundreds of dollars per target every month, generally paid at daily or monthly rates. To wiretap a customer's phone, T-Mobile charges law enforcement a flat fee of $500 per target. Sprint's wireless carrier Sprint Nextel requires police pay $400 per "market area" and per "technology" as well as a $10 per day fee, capped at $2,000. AT&T charges a $325 activation fee, plus $5 per day for data and $10 for audio. Verizon charges a $50 administrative fee plus $700 per month, per target.

Data requests for voicemail or text messages cost extra. AT&T demands $150 for access to a target's voicemail, while Verizon charges $50 for access to text messages. Sprint offers the most detailed breakdown of fees for various kinds of data on a phone, asking $120 for pictures or video, $60 for email, $60 for voice mail and $30 for text messages.

All four telecom firms also offer so-called "tower dumps" that allow police to see the numbers of every user accessing a certain cell tower over a certain time at an hourly rate. AT&T charges $75 per tower per hour, with a minimum of two hours. Verizon charges between $30 and $60 per hour for each cell tower. Sprint demands $150 per cell tower per hour, and Sprint charges $50 per tower, seemingly without an hourly rate.

For location data, the carrier firms offer automated tools that let police track suspects in real time. Sprint charges $30 per month per target to use its L-Site program for location tracking. AT&T's E911 tool costs $100 to activate and then $25 a day. T-Mobile charges a much pricier $100 per day.

And while carriers say they don’t profit from the wiretapping deals, what worries us is how often and how unregulated those checks seem to be. Time to get paranoid? Probably not, but it’s a good reminder that the Big Brother is watching, like it or not.

source: NY Times

10 Comments
  • Options
    Close




posted on 04 Apr 2012, 09:45 3

1. PAPINYC (Posts: 2192; Member since: 30 Jul 2011)


crApp, I'm losing out big time; iWiretAp all the time and I'm not getting anything for it.

posted on 04 Apr 2012, 10:14 2

2. jmoita2 (Posts: 930; Member since: 23 Dec 2011)


Ha!!! Why am I not surprised??? And we still have those who think they still have ANY privacy left...

posted on 04 Apr 2012, 11:44 1

3. JunitoNH (Posts: 842; Member since: 15 Feb 2012)


If you are a criminal, why would you use a cellphone? Why would you use a cellphone on a post paid account? why would you use any of the major carriers? why would you use your personal number? Anyway, very informatiave article nevertheless.

posted on 04 Apr 2012, 11:57

5. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)


A lot of criminals are not very smart. If they're they'd get a prepaid phone and pay cash so it can't be traced to them

posted on 04 Apr 2012, 11:45 2

4. Jonathan41 (Posts: 526; Member since: 22 Mar 2012)


Whatever, police can tap my phone. What are they gonna do? Post it on facebook?

posted on 04 Apr 2012, 11:58 4

6. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)


Wrong attitude man. Today it's tapping your phone tomorrow it's searching you with no warrant or locking you up without charging you.

posted on 04 Apr 2012, 12:20 3

7. jmoita2 (Posts: 930; Member since: 23 Dec 2011)


I must agree with you on this one. it goes to show you,though. In the end,corporations will do whatever is asked of them,no questions asked...for a big enough fee.

posted on 05 Apr 2012, 21:14

10. Jonathan41 (Posts: 526; Member since: 22 Mar 2012)


Idk, this just dosen't really jolt me as a big deal personally. If this is the first step in an ever increasing trend of police harassment thats one thing but, I just don't see the urgency about the police listening in on the conversations of their suspects. It defiantly sounds like it helps them catch criminals and there is no real draw back to it if your innocent. I mean I guess the police can learn you wore the same underwear all week or whatever but, that just doesn't really hit me as police harassment.

posted on 04 Apr 2012, 17:42

8. Jerry209 (Posts: 42; Member since: 17 Sep 2011)


@. taco50
marshall law

posted on 04 Apr 2012, 18:07 1

9. Captain_Doug (Posts: 748; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)


I agree but am also not one to give away freedom. For me, who cares if they listen to what i say? I have not a single thing to hide. At least from a government agency. That'd be one boring, expensive wiretap. As a whole, I understand that if we're okay with this, what will they try next? It'll get to a point where i won't be okay with it so it has to stop here.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories