Asus ZenFone 5 User Reviews
Overal user rating
The overall rating is the average of all user reviews, while the overall alternatives are the ones that has been listed most.
Internet8.5/10Call quality6.8/10Battery4.3/10Reception8.8/10Display9/10Build quality7.5/10Text input8.8/10Everyday usage8/10UI speed8.5/10Camera8.3/10Multimedia6.3/10
Post new review
Please note that each user review reflects the opinion of its respectful author and not of Phone Arena.
posted on 22 Jan 2015, 00:49 (Posts: 0; Member since: 25 Jul 2014)
The King Of Mid-Range
indraajati_29 has owned it for less than year before publishing this review
i bought this phone 6 months ago with only $220 and i got this great device with HD resolution also with a good pixel density , about performance?? it also great , yeah i know it only gets a dual-core cpu , but you know this phone also has 2 gigs RAM , i played some big games and NO LAG !! about camera?? it's absolutely WOW with 8 megapixel it's more than enough for a mid-range phone , the only weakness is this phone is battery life cz it only got 2500 , only 12 hours if you play the game and network on it will be dead on , but all of it are extremely SUPERB for $220 !!Build quality 9/10Reception 10/10Call quality 8/10Internet 10/10Multimedia 8/10Camera 10/10UI speed 10/10Everyday usage 8/10Text input 10/10Display 10/10Battery 6/10
posted on 06 Jan 2015, 01:00 (Posts: 0; Member since: 06 Jan 2015)
The Best Buck for your Money
b3rno93 has owned it for more than one year before publishing this review
The Phone is amazingly great for the Price, and the performace is extremly good for a 2 core phone, it's as good as an S4, which was its rival back then, tho it had a problem, and that's why I will only have a 6/10 in customer Service, The KitKat update, arrived nearly at the end of the year, and KitKat was already out at the time they released the Phone, but that is just a minor problem, the update had to many issues that left me without Data Connectivity for a month!(I desided to keep everithing nearly stock, since the phone was an experience for me for future Asus Products), and let me Tell you I will go for it for more with those guys, they are MVPsBuild quality 9/10Reception 10/10Call quality 7/10Internet 8/10Multimedia 5/10Camera 8/10UI speed 10/10Everyday usage 10/10Text input 9/10Display 9/10Battery 6/10
- Low Light Cam
- Battery optimization need adjustments
posted on 21 Dec 2014, 00:42 (Posts: 0; Member since: 20 Dec 2014)
A winner of a smartphone at its price band and specs
VicMan has owned it for less than year before publishing this review
I have explained in detail against each section how and why I have awarded the score. To sum it up though I would say that a higher capacity battery and better speakerphone could have earned it a perfect 10.
For those who are looking to crash benchmark records you ought to be looking at the hot phones section!
Build quality 10/10Reception 9/10Call quality 4/10Internet 9/10Multimedia 4/10Camera 8/10UI speed 10/10Everyday usage 10/10Text input 10/10Display 9/10Battery 4/10
posted on 14 Dec 2014, 06:54 (Posts: 0; Member since: 14 Dec 2014)
Below average Phone.
franzmel has owned it for less than year before publishing this review
Been using this phone for almost a 4 months and planning to sell it. One major problem was the battery, Im surprised that asus only put a 2kmah battery to a 5" and 32nm processor phone, it doesnt make sense!
Anything else is below average. Only good thing is the display and the camera.Build quality 2/10Reception 6/10Call quality 8/10Internet 7/10Multimedia 8/10Camera 7/10UI speed 4/10Everyday usage 4/10Text input 6/10Display 8/10Battery 1/10
- Below average battery
- Build quality is poor
- Below average speaker
1 out of 4 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report