x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Verizon Cameraphone Comparison Q4 2009

Posted: , by PhoneArena Team


Verizon Cameraphone Comparison Q4 2009
Overall Ratings:

In each of the test categories we gave the six phones a different rating.  The first place phone brings 6 points, 5 points for the second place, 4 points for third place, 3 points for the fourth place, 2 points for the fifth place, and 1 point for sixth place.

We believe that the Motorola DROID takes the best real-world images and award it 1st place, as it earned a total of 24 points. All of the images were properly exposed, sharp, and in-focus, with colors being neutral and not over-saturated. The Auto White Balance also performed the best out of the tested phones, which is why indoor images had accurate colors. For night images you just have to remember to select the “night portrait” mode for them to come out their best.

The HTC Imagio comes in at 2nd place with 18 points. Most images were almost as good as the DROID, but colors were a bit over-saturated at times, making them look unnatural.

The LG enV Touch slightly beats out the Rogue for 3rd place and with 13 points. Outside images are good, but it also suffers from colors being over saturated. The enV Touch also doesn’t do as good a job with night images as the DROID and Imagio. The Macro images were the worst out of the bunch, but this is an area where most people don’t use the camera that often.

Coming in a close 4th is the Samsung Rogue, also with 13 points, but the Rogue doesn’t do as well with daytime, nighttime, and inside images as the enV Touch. Though the Rogue does better with Macro images.

The HTC DROID ERIS comes in at 5th place with 10 points. This is because most of the images don’t look sharp and appear slightly blurry, as well as having the worst color matching and auto white balance out of the six phones.

The Samsung Omnia II comes in last at 6th place and with 6 points, as its outside images had poor color matching, were over exposed, and had purple fringing. Inside images also had problems with the auto white balance under varying artificial light, and night images were blurry.


With each new cameraphone comparison review we’ve see a slow progression to better quality images, but unfortunately we still haven’t arrived with a real all-in-one replacement for a traditional digital camera. So what does this mean to the consumer? Simply that a cameraphone, such as the Motorola DROID, does take good quality pictures…for a cameraphone…and that it still by no means will replace your Canon or Nikon camera. It would be nice if phone manufactures would place more importance on having a good quality camera integrated with the phone, then just considering it as an afterthought. What we need to see happen is for cameraphones to have larger sensors (which gather more light), have higher quality optics, and better software. Until then, most people will continue to rely on traditional digital cameras for capturing their important photos.

Motorola DROID Review
HTC Imagio Review
LG enV Touch Review
Samsung Rogue Review
Samsung Omnia II Review

  • Options

posted on 20 Oct 2010, 01:55

1. rtimi26 (Posts: 42; Member since: 16 Mar 2009)

Are you kidding me. It is either you guys know nothing about taking pictures, but hey its your opinion

posted on 29 Dec 2009, 16:12

2. ace1122 (Posts: 237; Member since: 23 Mar 2009)

Their opinion seems pretty right on if you ask me.

posted on 29 Dec 2009, 16:22

3. jwl3429 (Posts: 36; Member since: 28 Sep 2009)

i am not to sure about the review either i am a avid photographer and i have the omnia 2, i think with a few tweaks to the camera setting the pictures are much better it seems crazy to me that it is rated below the eris as well as most of the others the droid is not that great of a phone.

posted on 30 Dec 2009, 09:05

4. T DAWGv12 (Posts: 13; Member since: 09 Dec 2009)

I agree with all three of you actually. rtimi26 is right on about it being their opinion and boy does it seem inconsistent at best. Ace1122 is right about their opinion being right on. They took crappy photos and had crappy opinions to go along with them. This is my opinion coming from someone that is NOT an avid photographer but a tech geek fluent in digital cameras. jwl3429 is right on, I too have an the Omnia 2 (a far better phone than many reviews make it out to be by the way) and have quickly learned a few simple tweaks with brightness and flash options that can even produce crisp well balanced images in a dimly lit room. At the very least this review needs to be more explicit that they did not adjust any of these phones cameras outside of auto or factory settings. Should they do a re-review with the phones cameras tweaked they would likely have very different images if not very different results and likely all the phones are capapble of much better images. Thats my opinion.

posted on 05 Jan 2010, 01:25

5. smokiedabong (Posts: 1; Member since: 05 Jan 2010)

:)) , sounds like a Droid comercial . I had an Omnia 2 for some time now , and couple of weeks ago also got a Droid , good phone at anything else but the camera . Definitely the Omnia 2 camera performs way better in quality in any conditions and speed than the Droid , to bad it's slower at anything else .

posted on 19 Sep 2010, 05:09

6. mathais (unregistered)

omnia 2 images do look smoother and deeper in colour but you have to know that droid represents colour more accurately.even the droid has manual settings that can tweak its images further.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories