x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options

Sony Xperia Z1 Compact Review

0. phoneArena posted on 23 Jan 2014, 09:22

We don't necessarily have to view the Sony Xperia Z1 Compact as an alternative to the popular Android flagships that are currently available. There is another function that Sony's latest handset might be willing to perform, and that is to compete with the iPhone 5s – not the way other Android flagships do (which is by differentiation), but by facing it directly and fighting for the very same customers. While this certainly doesn't sound like an easy challenge, the Xperia Z1 Compact seems surprisingly fit for the task...

This is a discussion for a review. To read the whole review, click here

posted on 23 Jan 2014, 18:15 3

36. aldridhl (Posts: 74; Member since: 12 Feb 2011)

papss, we may be fans of wp, but we shouldnt try to pick fights. Android or not this is a refreshing change to the "bigger is better" agenda many OEMs are pushing nowawdays.

posted on 23 Jan 2014, 12:26 6

21. SonyPS4 (Posts: 346; Member since: 21 May 2013)

I dont understand why this score lower than Xperia Z1 (9.2) when it has better screen, same processor, same camera and everything except screen resolution and battery (which shoud not affect score sincce it is smaller).

"Relativly small display" ? It supposed to be small high end smartphone and i dont see PA complain Iphone, S4 mini and One mini screen size but WHY Sony ?? Seems this guy really hate Sony.

posted on 23 Jan 2014, 12:36 2

22. SonyPS4 (Posts: 346; Member since: 21 May 2013)

My only complaint for this phone is older version of android 4.3 instead of 4.4 and 16GB internal storage. Should be at least 32GB or 64GB. Overall is is the best mini smartphone without compromise any perforamnce. Samsung, HTC should follow this trend

posted on 24 Jan 2014, 14:43

57. FredoGavera (Posts: 7; Member since: 09 Jan 2013)

Disagree completely. As a company it makes no sense to spend the time and resources into making models with separate internal memories when that option already comes in the form of an SD card slot. Seriously, doing that only forces the company to make each variant more expensive which is bad for both the company and consumer. I would rather sony mass produce one model and cut the costs down as much as possible and insert my $20 32GB SD card than pay an extra $50-$100 for 32GB.... especially since I already own the SD card as it is.

Besides, for most people memory is used up mostly by music, videos, and pictures. Non of these things will really show any benefit from internal storage...

posted on 23 Jan 2014, 12:57

23. newyorker78 (Posts: 1; Member since: 23 Jan 2014)

A big hope for this amazing device to be released in US market, Can't Wait!

posted on 23 Jan 2014, 12:58 3

24. Avenger827 (Posts: 46; Member since: 19 Jan 2014)

Crap biased review, it's supposed to be smaller than flagships, it's even in the name, can't you read english? Do I need to tell you the meaning of "compact"? This is the reason I always listen to gsmarena reviews, not crap iphone arena reviews. And are you people that much desperate that you've turned "iphone arena"(without space in the middle) into an offensive word? You should be ashamed, how much is apple paying you,huh?

posted on 23 Jan 2014, 13:30

28. Feanor (Posts: 849; Member since: 20 Jun 2012)

I think the review is quite good, it really doesn't mention any grave drawbacks. The score is only a bit unfair... and yes, the "small display" con.

posted on 23 Jan 2014, 13:03

25. RandomUsername (Posts: 808; Member since: 29 Oct 2013)

Sky-high frame-rates at all times?

posted on 23 Jan 2014, 13:14 1

27. RandomUsername (Posts: 808; Member since: 29 Oct 2013)

Relatively small display as a con? Are you drunk, Ray?

posted on 23 Jan 2014, 21:39 1

41. fireblade (Posts: 717; Member since: 27 Dec 2013)

I remember when 3.5" display was considered too big lol

posted on 23 Jan 2014, 13:37

29. sergiobr (Posts: 713; Member since: 25 Feb 2013)

Overprocessed photos :-( That´s Sony !

posted on 23 Jan 2014, 13:42

30. Feanor (Posts: 849; Member since: 20 Jun 2012)

The review says that this is an issue in full scale, but once you scale the photos down to the 8 or 13Mpx of the competition, the photos are rather good.

posted on 23 Jan 2014, 16:12

33. jphillips63 (Posts: 245; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)

So what carriers will have this phone?

posted on 23 Jan 2014, 16:52

35. Lyngdoh (Posts: 298; Member since: 06 Sep 2012)

The Z1 compact's display is not a di*k that it has to be seen as a con for being small.

posted on 23 Jan 2014, 18:20

37. Edmund (Posts: 656; Member since: 13 Jul 2012)

What on earth are you idiots on about (re bias) ?? 9/10 for a phone with so many shortcomings is an excellent score

posted on 23 Jan 2014, 19:26 2

39. Tech_Junkie1996 (Posts: 43; Member since: 29 Aug 2013)

What shortcomings? Screen size? Is made to be smaller than flagship devices. Internal specs? It has the latest in internals. Battery? It has a 2300 mah battery, which is pretty high for a phone off that size. For reference, the GSIII had a 2100 may battery. Camera? It has a 21 MP camera. ROM? 16 GB is more than enough for the average user, and it has a micro SD slot. What shortcomings can you point out?

posted on 23 Jan 2014, 18:25 1

38. ncarlosmiguel (Posts: 206; Member since: 14 May 2013)

This is great for people who already have a tablet. No need for a big screen phone.

posted on 23 Jan 2014, 21:14

40. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)

People need to stop complaining. Different reviewers have different standards. Relatively small display can be a con for one reviewer and a pro to another. People need to stop looking for discrepancies in two completely different reviews. The writer at the time makes it as fair as his biases allow and is not obligated to look at an ancient iPhone 5s review before writing their Xperia Z1 compact review....

2nd, the small display is a much bigger culprit here because the dpi and font settings for Android are mainly tailored for larger screens and the compact is much much bigger than the iPhone 5s overall. With the Xperia Z1 compact dimensions, Samsung or sharp or moto can make a much bigger display in the same dimensions or less. The Sharp phone with a 4.5 inch 1080 p screen is smaller than the 5s. This is way fatter with a 4.3 inch 720p screen.

posted on 23 Jan 2014, 22:57 3

44. yudi.nemesis (Posts: 1127; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)

Ooh... tater why do you always say something really stupid???

Iphone 5s is the latest and the most advanced smartphone from apple.

Z1 Compact is intended for people who want a phone that is compact but also has cutting edge specs.
Smaller screen and dimension than average flagships should be an advantage, that's why in Japan Z1 Compact has a much better sales than the Z1, Note 3, G2, Iphone 5s and others.

Z1 Compact is bigger than the iphone but the difference is not too much at all (http://mobiltelefon.ru/post_1389058201.html).
And anyone with common sense will surely be amazed with what sony doing, especially when considering Z1 compact is using larger camera sensors, battery and also superior in durability than the iphone or sharp mini.

I agree with you that Sharp can make bezelless waterproof phone, but you must be dreaming when you say that samsung and moto can do better job than Sony (just show me any bezelles waterproof phone from samsung or moto at least with IP57 certification!!! )

But don't worry in near future your beloved company (samsung) will copy sharp technology so they can make bezelles waterproof phone.

Sharp mini is taller, wider and thicker than iphone 5s (Sharp mini 124 x 63 x 9.9 mm even the thickest part is 10.3 mm)

posted on 23 Jan 2014, 23:03 1

45. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)

Lol no one cares about waterproof. That is why the iPhone and galaxy series doesn't bother with it. The Moto X has a 4.7 inch screen and it's pretty much the same size as the Z1 compact.

Oh and you are dreaming if you think the compact is barely bigger than the iPhone 5s, it's way chunkier. You Sony fanboys are delusional.

I wouldn't call anyone stupid until you start reading the crap that comes out of your mouth. Lol

posted on 23 Jan 2014, 23:38 2

46. Feanor (Posts: 849; Member since: 20 Jun 2012)

Erm... but it's true that your comment is not the cleverest... this bezel talk has to finally stop, particularly for this phone. It's not only the waterproofing, it also the bigger battery and camera sensor. There is no comparison with anything else in the market, so stop trying to find shortcomings where there are none. If a device needs to be a couple of mm larger in order to pack the most advanced camera, the largest battery and waterproofing, then so be it. Ultimately we are talking about a few mm more, not an ergonomical disaster.

posted on 24 Jan 2014, 10:29

51. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)

Naw. The difference is pretty big and you like Sony too much to admit it. The camera on the Z1 isn't even that great according to reviews. No excuses there. Ultimately, the waterproofing, battery, and camera is not advanced enough to justify the size increase and I am sure I am not the only one that thinks it's way too bulky for a 4.3 inch phone.

posted on 24 Jan 2014, 08:23 2

49. CanYouSeeTheLight (Posts: 1122; Member since: 05 Jul 2012)

Oh, now Sony fanboys are delusional? Just take a look at your pathetic posts, you can only complain and complain and complain about everything that doesn't start with an S and end with a G.

posted on 24 Jan 2014, 10:34

52. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)

Yes Sony fans are extremely delusional, they actually defend deal breakers like huge bezels , annoying flaps, and poor viewing angles.

Yes this phone improves on the poor display.

They also put compactness, probably one of the most important parts of a MOBILE phone, well below other criteria. And they seem to place waterproof and megapixels at the same importance level of display and usability. If that isn't delusional, then if don't know what is.

posted on 24 Jan 2014, 12:30 2

53. Feanor (Posts: 849; Member since: 20 Jun 2012)

Taters, the Samsung Galaxy S4 mini, which is what Samsung came up with in this segment, is only 2mm shorter and half mm thinner having inferior camera, plasticky body, smaller battery and worse screen and no waterproofing. Who is delusional here?
Also the Z1 camera has won all camera comparisons in Phonearena and GSM arena, even if by a small margin. Influencial camera websites also consider it amongst the best cameras in smartphones.

posted on 25 Jan 2014, 10:59 2

61. PorkyBurger (Posts: 585; Member since: 18 May 2013)

People, I am absolutely OK with you stating that the Z1 Compact is the best "mini" model here. I think like that too.
But you have forgotten one thing:
Z1 Compact - new High-end phone (even considering its size)
S4 Mini and One Mini - old midrangers.
Ahem. Don't go full retard, please.

posted on 25 Jan 2014, 12:52 1

63. Feanor (Posts: 849; Member since: 20 Jun 2012)

I didn't say that Z1 is exact the same; I'm just saying that Sony wouldn't be able magic out some impossible solution of fitting so much more technology in a bezeless body. We need to have some reason. Also, ok, bezels are a bit critical on a 5" phone, but a 4.3" phone can take a bit of bezel without making it unusable.

posted on 05 Feb 2014, 00:36

79. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)

Sure they can. Put a good iPhone 5 level 8 mp camera or a gs4 level 16mp camera and make it thinner. Take out the water proofing and make it thinner.

Plenty of ways if they really wanted it thinner and smaller, which they really should have went for.

posted on 05 Feb 2014, 00:32

78. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)

You are delusional... 2mm and half a mm is a lot......

Besides, no one is talking about the gs4 mini. We are talking about the z1 compact. The GS4 isn't even remotely the best of what Samsung can do. If you believe that, then you are more delusional than the Sony fans. The GS4 mini is like a pimped out version of the Galaxy Ace, meaning it is in the same boat as the mega, round, etc.

posted on 24 Jan 2014, 12:46 2

54. yudi.nemesis (Posts: 1127; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)

Yeah no one cares about waterproof maybe that's why sony phone sales have increased (although most Sony phones has poor viewing angle, large bezel and less feature than samsung phones).

Even with smaller sensor and battery Moto X is still thicker than Z Compact, and if you talking about bezels can you show me any phone from moto or samsung with better screen ratio than Xperia ZL???

I'm not think that the compact is barely bigger
than the iPhone 5s because I have show you real life comparison between iphone and Z1 Compact.
And anyone with a good eyes can see clearly that the difference between the iphone and Compact was not too much (Just remember Compact also has bigger sensor and battery than iphone + waterproof).

For me you are very stupid because everythings that you have said is complete nonsense.
Let me tell you the reason why
1. for electronic devices especialy the one that you carry almost all the time and waterproofing is way... more important than bezelles body.
2. Bigger battery also much more important than slim body.
3. I'm 100% sure 9.5 mm is slim enough for almost any normal adult human.

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories