x PhoneArena is hiring! News writer
Performance:

Call quality with the Xperia S is very good, with loud and clear voices in the earpiece on our end, while the other side said we sounded very clean, with strong volume, and the noise-canceling mics managed to weed out the ambient sounds while we were talking.

The loudspeaker is very strong, as we mentioned, meaning that it will be unlikely you’ll miss a call. As long as the sound is turned on.

Sony Xperia S Review
 Another feature in the Sony Xperia S is the improved lithium-polymer technology that allows the device to charge in half the time of a regular battery. Just 10 minutes of charging time will get the Xperia S up and running for 1 hour. Even when we just plugged it in our wimpy computer USB port, the battery went from 65% to 90% in about half an hour.

The 1750mAh battery is rated for the commendable 8 hours and 30 minutes talk time and 25 hours of music playback. Standby is also very good, but if the screen is on a lot, the phone drains the battery like a typical Android high-end for a day, day and a half, depending how you stress it.

We looped an HD clip at ⅔ brightness and the phone’s battery went from hero to zero 10 minutes before it reached the 5-hour playback mark with Wi-Fi off, but connected to the HSPA+ network. If we had placed the brightness on 50%, the Xperia S would probably hit the six hours and thirty minutes video playback threshold it quotes for itself, which is about the norm for most high-ends.


Conclusion:

What can we say in the end, but to acknowledge that Sony has hit the nail on the head with the Xperia S. From the characteristic design decisions, like a transparent illuminated strip, through an amazing HD display, to the ultra-fast camera, the first Sony-only handset is a delight.

Given the above advantages, beefs that we’d consider a nuisance in other handsets, like the fussy capacitive buttons or the sealed battery, here seem minor. You can tap the capacitive key one more time if you can’t dot the i the first time, and the battery holds well, so no need to swap often, but you can’t get such a fast and capable camera or a display as detailed in most other phones.

Actually, only the iPhone 4S can measure up to the camera speed and no-hassle great results of the 12MP Exmor R sensor in the Xperia S, but Sony’s phone offers that sweet Quick Launch camera mode. Apple’s Retina Display also has pixel density close to the one on the Xperia S, but the 4.3-incher dwarfs it and would be preferable for Android’s big screen lovers; or not so, if you have smaller hands, or if you prefer the App Store.

On the Android front, you can check out the LG Nitro HD/LG Optimus LTE, which also has a great HD display and 8MP camera, or the HTC Rezound with Beats Audio. The Galaxy S II with its Super AMOLED display has a slower to react camera, but its night shots actually measured the light better than Sony's phone. And, of course, now we have HTC's One X with sub-second camera shenanigans, thanks to ICS and the HTC ImageChip, whose camera. however, has some kinks to be ironed in comparison.

We only wish the Xperia S shipped with Ice Cream Sandwich out of the box, otherwise it proves that you can come late to the multicore party, and still be more capable than most.

Software version of the reviewed unit: 6.0.A.1.249


Sony Xperia S Video Review:


Pros

  • Very good photo and video quality
  • One second from sleep to snap
  • Quality HD display with ultra-high pixel density
  • Distinguished design with a transparent illuminated strip
  • Hearty 32GB of internal storage
  • Strong loudspeaker with clean sound
  • Good call quality
  • Rapid battery charging

Cons

  • The capacitive button dots are hard to spot and not very responsive
  • Sealed battery compartment
  • No memory expansion slot

PhoneArena Rating:

8.5

User Rating:

9.5
42 Reviews

FEATURED VIDEO

96 Comments

buggerrer

Posts: 306; Member since: Sep 21, 2011

nice phone, for 2011 !

Mozarrt

Posts: 301; Member since: Oct 08, 2011

Could you at least tell us why you think its a phone for 2011.

leftheodo

Posts: 108; Member since: Oct 21, 2011

- Android 2.3 not ICS -2011 CPU ( Snapdragon S3 not S4 ) -2011 GPU (Adreno 220) The 2012 phones will be out in april ( One X, Optimus 4x, possibly GS3 as the korean ZDnet mentioned today) Xperia S is a nice looking phone but Sony is to late!

Commentator

Posts: 3722; Member since: Aug 16, 2011

There must be a lot of Sony fanboys out there voting you down, because everything you said makes perfect sense, especially the point about its S3 processor. What differentiates this from, say, an HTC Rezound?

SalmanAhmad

Posts: 2; Member since: Nov 02, 2012

ICS upgrade is now available and the phone will get Jellybean soon hopefully. 2011 CPU Snapdragon S3? I have the phone and it barely lags and it is extremely responsive. Adreno 220 and 225 isn't that much of a difference. The phone has amazing PPI, great graphics, fast processor 1GB of RAM and is made out of durable materials. Last but not least it's much less expensive than all phones of 2012(One X, Optimus 4x, GS3.) It also features an amazing camera, how I know all this? I bought the phone about a month ago.

nsnk86

Posts: 43; Member since: Jun 18, 2012

i totally agree with you Salman!! am using this phone for more than 4months......

metoyou

Posts: 279; Member since: Oct 19, 2011

Sony always late in smart phone, they now release this phone in 2012 and will release quad-cores in 2013..hm... But I do like this phone design but not gonna get it IF it has S4 in it then it's another story. btw. reviewer is correct the capacitive buttons arent really repsonsive (friend have this fone)

SalmanAhmad

Posts: 2; Member since: Nov 02, 2012

The buttons are a bit unresponsive at first but once you get the hang of it they aren't really a problem. If you can't find the appropriate place of the buttons, slowly swipe upwards with your finger on the buttons and you will eventually find their places and it won't be a problem any longer.

darknight307rc

Posts: 7; Member since: Feb 26, 2012

and what are u guys "Quadcore lovers" gonna do with a quadcore "cellphone"? work with "Auto CAD" or "Adobe photoshop" on ur cell phone??? what do u really use ur phone for other than..calling of course..surfing the net..music..photo or video shooting..check ur mail...gaming & stay connected to facebook or twitter. all that can be simply done by only a single core & 512MB RAM...even Android itself as an OS it doesn't need more than this to operate fast. and here is a phone with dual-core & 1GB RAM which will make any app goes very fast plus a 12 MP cam captures photos from sleep mode to shooting in less than 1.5 secs which makes it the fastest phone in market. it's just not about putting in a phone the latest tech or specs. if u really need the quadcore or the 3 or 5 GB RAM in ur phone for ur daily life tasks...wait for the GSIII or HTC one X. but with all respect the Xperia S is not an old one..it's fits all the needs & even more for a Smartphone in 2012

radreadiano

Posts: 1; Member since: Aug 19, 2012

u did good!!! i absolut love this phone

nsnk86

Posts: 43; Member since: Jun 18, 2012

i totally agree with you darknight307rc.... if u guys wanna spend all d cash for a quadcore phone with like 2gb ram, instead you can get an ultrabook or a gud laptop coz it wil hv bigger display & using all these latest specs in a laptop will prove much useful....

lintek

Posts: 8; Member since: Jun 08, 2012

EXACTLY!!!

kshell1

Posts: 1143; Member since: Oct 05, 2011

so let me get this straight, every other phone that launches with 2.3 gets a con and points taken off but this one doesn't? Hypocritical if you ask me

RamyRamz69

Posts: 390; Member since: Dec 12, 2011

Perhaps because Sony's version of Gingerbread allows much more customization than the normal GB. Or maybe because this deice will be upgraded to ICS before other devices hit the shelf.

henrickrw

Posts: 408; Member since: Sep 16, 2011

Get yourself a galaxy s 2 or a note

Mozarrt

Posts: 301; Member since: Oct 08, 2011

Why get an ugly platic slab if you can have this. Only the Nokia 800/N9 rivals this handset in looks.

kshell1

Posts: 1143; Member since: Oct 05, 2011

i personally think it looks like a decent phone and great scores for the processor its using mostly because crapdragons are horrible

Chronos

Posts: 258; Member since: Feb 25, 2012

Only because that "ugly plastic slab" looks better than the Sony Xperia S.

ivanprskalo

Posts: 124; Member since: Dec 09, 2010

It is not. These matters are personal oppinion and please keep your to youself, or else... :-)

Giggity

Posts: 147; Member since: Nov 17, 2011

Is the S also sports the aluminum body like the P?

r41nier

Posts: 70; Member since: Oct 13, 2011

no, it's just plastic but it does have an anti-stain UV nano coating

CivicSi89

Posts: 349; Member since: Jul 23, 2011

Anti Stain... Giggety

robocopvn

Posts: 504; Member since: Mar 10, 2010

Need to mention that Sony Xperia S and brothers still you S3 snapdragon, which is outdated comparing to S4 used in many phones and tablet Sony seems to be so slow on upgrading their hardwares ! But I love their designs

bayusuputra

Posts: 963; Member since: Feb 12, 2012

but it is better in most benchmarks than the S2.. i think it's not whether it is outdated, but whether Sony could optimised it in this handset, which i believe they did..

robocopvn

Posts: 504; Member since: Mar 10, 2010

Qualcomm SOC always get better points in benchmarks apps. But in games and real apps, their GPU is worse than PowerVR :D

Aaron_R96 unregistered

Firstly, I disagree that its a 2011 phone, sure it has many of the same specs of the galaxy s2 and the likes, but has a better screen and camera by far, also those moaning it has no quad core processor, I dont see why it would need one, particularly ifit runs so well on dual core, just because the technology is available, doesnt mesn it needs to be used, it wont make anawful lot of difference to theaverage phone user anyway, plus it looks on of the best devices recently released, the one x looks like your typical htc device anyway, lacks creativity, tbh, id much rather show this off. Sorry.

taz89

Posts: 2014; Member since: May 03, 2011

have the s2 and agree that quad is not necessary but the should have atleast used the new s4 dual core instead of last years s3. love the design of this but hate the fact that the capacitive buttons seem unresponsive,hopefully can be fixed via software and oh the charging speed of this phone looks awesome,the s2 takes forever to charge and is the only negative of the s2. cant wait to have a play round with the s,brithers already ordered it but for me i am waiting for the s3.

Aaron_R96 unregistered

Yes they should've done I do agree with that point, just see quad core as a tad unnecerssary for the casual user, but S4 would have been preffered and yes, it is also a shame about the capacitive buttons too, but currently deciding between this and the Xperia P, so looks like that'll be an issue for me either way!

itiswhatitis

Posts: 423; Member since: Jan 23, 2012

believe me i've tried it at the store the capacitive buttons are no way unresponsive its just the review opinion, i mean i dont even need to try its like everything else!

bolaG

Posts: 468; Member since: Aug 15, 2011

If this would have come out in Nov of last year I would have been all over it :( Love the design Love the camera quality and functions Love Sony.

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Xperia S
  • Display 4.3" 720 x 1280 pixels
  • Camera 12.1 MP / 1.3 MP front
  • Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon S3, Dual-core, 1500 MHz
  • Storage 32 GB
  • Battery 1750 mAh(8.50h 3G talk time)

Latest Stories