Performance:

Samsung Gravity TXT Review
Emitting weak tones through the earpiece, it’s rather difficult in distinctively making out words – despite hearing clear and noise-free voices through it. Conversely, our callers are dealt with their own challenge in deciphering hollow voices on their end of the line. Moreover, voices are muffled in tone with a hint of echoing when using the speakerphone.

Even though we didn’t experience any dropped phone calls during our testing, we experienced a few instances of the handset fluctuating in signal strength in high coverage areas within the greater Philadelphia region.

If you love to talk, then you’ll be impressed by the immaculate battery life of the handset since we’re able to get well over 10 hours of talk time on a single charge – versus the 6.5 hours rated by the manufacturer. Using the handset normally, it’s able to give well over two days of usage.


Conclusion:

When we hear something priced at $10 on-contract, we might be reluctant in being a bit more harsh with its performance, but in the case of the Samsung Gravity TXT, we can’t get our mind off its abysmal experience. For a messaging oriented device, it already fails to even hit the mark loosely in that specific category due to the annoyances we find with its keyboard and optical joystick. Confining itself even more to an untimely demise, there are just way too many loose ends with this $10 phone that would make us drop it in a heartbeat in favor of something else – maybe some sort of entry-level smartphone. Honestly, this handset is one of the reasons why feature phones are increasingly becoming less relevant.

Software Version: T379UVKF9


Samsung Gravity TXT Video Review:



Pros

  • Cheap
  • Good battery life

Cons

  • Feels very cheap
  • Unresponsive optical joystick
  • Frustrating messaging experience
  • Unable to display complex web pages properly
  • Horrendous photo & video capture

PhoneArena Rating:

2.0

User Rating:

7.0
1 Reviews

FEATURED VIDEO

12 Comments

1. DontHateOnS60

Posts: 872; Member since: Apr 20, 2009

"Unable to display complex web pages properly," "Horrendous photo & video capture." Really?? What part did you not understand about this being a cheap feature phone?

2. RORYREVOLUTION

Posts: 3131; Member since: Jan 12, 2010

this isn't a smartphone running a dual core processor. Its a cheap feature phone and thus should be reviewed as such. I really don't see how or why feature phones should be compared to high end smartphones, a very harsh review.

3. LAW unregistered

Actually, John V's reviews always follow the same review format no matter what phone. Guy never compared it to a smartphone. He just always goes through the same basic features: buttons, navigation, web, camera, and calling. If anything, he was saying that the Samsung is not that great for what it was designed for (a messaging phone).

4. RORYREVOLUTION

Posts: 3131; Member since: Jan 12, 2010

despite that reviewers always complain about how low resolution displays receiver since the iPhone came out with the retina display. They all expect feature phones to have them too. They complain about the web browsing experience when most feature phones weren't even expected to have them period.

6. nando unregistered

ive seen way better phones from nokia at same price so i dont think he is comparing this phone with smartphones is just its low quality can be viewed on the video so people i have samsung on my own and had samsung for long but even i love samsung i know not every phone they build is great!

7. nando unregistered

ive seen way better phones from nokia at same price so i dont think he is comparing this phone with smartphones is just its low quality can be viewed on the video so people i have samsung on my own and had samsung for long but even i love samsung i know not every phone they build is great!

8. nando unregistered

ive seen way better phones from nokia at same price so i dont think he is comparing this phone with smartphones is just its low quality can be viewed on the video so people i have samsung on my own and had samsung for long but even i love samsung i know not every phone they build is great!

9. Zach unregistered

Lol I LOVE my gravity 3 and would love this one;) stop comparing it 2 smartfones and get reel I want this one BAD and I'm a heavy texter so...

10. Cyndi unregistered

I'm a low key texter, so thought this phone would be enough, WRONG! I'm also having problems with getting service in my house, 3 phones and one booster box from T-moblie later, still no service. T-mobile said "too bad, but you could buy a $200.00 Blackberry from us that would be wireless with you computer so you could have service". Jeez, thanks, I don't have $200.00. Customer for 8+ years, will not be any more!

11. bksond

Posts: 1; Member since: Sep 24, 2011

We just bought two of these. One for me and one for my son. This review is not really very realistic. I wonder why you gave this such a bad review? Its not a Smartphone like people are saying and it does what I need it to do. Just wanted a simple phone for texting and calls for emergencies only. Besides T-Mobile has the Sidekick if you want something more high end quality. I actually love the simple design and the way this phone looks. Also have seen worse looking phones. Long as it works and does what I want its all good. The quality isn't as bad as stated either in the review. If you're not sure, then you need to go into T-mobile and touch, feel and try it out to see what you think.

12. jake unregistered

Samsung gravity. 3 lokks nicer designed but i want samsung geavity t t means touch this txt lookslike messagung phone from two years ago

13. Nadr1212

Posts: 741; Member since: Sep 22, 2012

Life was sad back then (in 2011)
Gravity TXT
  • Display 2.4" 240 x 320 pixels
  • Camera 2 MP
  • Storage 0.115 GB + microSDHC
  • Battery 1000 mAh(6.50h talk time)

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.