x PhoneArena is hiring! News writer

Samsung Galaxy S III mini Review

Call quality and Battery:

Samsung Galaxy S III mini Review
The Galaxy S III has a very good earpiece that delivers loud and clear sounds with ease. Well, the microphone of the handset on the other end of the line should also be of decent quality, but when it comes to the earpiece itself – it can do a great job. The mic of the S III mini is not as brilliant, as our voice didn't sound as well to our callers, but it's still more than decent.

The battery that supplies power to the Galaxy S III mini is a 1500 mAh one, but unfortunately, official talk-time and stand-by times have not been disclosed. Nonetheless, after we used the handset for a while, we came to the conclusion that it can easily go through two normal days of use, as long as you don't push it too hard. If you happen to be a heavy type of user, you can expect up to one day of battery life out of it.


The Samsung Galaxy S III mini is a lovely mainstream smartphone. All of a sudden, the Galaxy S III's “nature-inspired” design looks and feels right in your hand. The device is easy to hold and operate, while its 4-inch screen is big enough to provide a comfortable and pleasant experience for smartphone users.

We won't really recommend this one if you're a diehard geek who wants the biggest and baddest device possible, but we can certainly recommend it to pretty much everybody else. It's a well-balanced performer with absolutely no major drawbacks.

With Samsung being dangerously close to conquering the high-end of the Android landscape, it looks like the South Koreans are now willing to take over the mid-range as well. With strong performers like the Galaxy S III mini, it looks like they will.

Software version of the reviewed unit: Android 4.1.1, Build JRO03H

Samsung Galaxy S III mini Video Review:


  • Elegant and compact design
  • Comes with Android 4.1 Jelly Bean


  • Video recording is so-so
  • The physical buttons could be better

PhoneArena Rating:


User Rating:

16 Reviews




Posts: 462; Member since: May 09, 2012

oh haha just because this is a samsung it gets 8.9! Yay!!!,,,, And Sony has better phones for cheaper prices than this also better looking.. so biased..


Posts: 482; Member since: Apr 06, 2012

Seriously dude... phonearena is extremely biased especially Ray S.


Posts: 76; Member since: Oct 08, 2012

You misspelled 'micheal h'

ZEUS.the.thunder.god unregistered

nice review Ray. i think its a very fair rating considering its a mid range device.


Posts: 270; Member since: Oct 20, 2012

Nice review ??? lets see, Sony Xperia P, mid range device, 4inch 960x540 screen res, 8mp camera, 1080p video recording, aluminium body, almost same internal specs, 320$ bucks unlocked in Amazon...and STILL this "mini" gets a better score ?? seriusly PhoneArena, your bias against Sony is horrible.


Posts: 1; Member since: Dec 18, 2012

Hey! Lets look at xperia p. Its unremovable battery, battery only 1305 mAh, no sd card slot!! Its fair!!


Posts: 1488; Member since: Dec 29, 2011

Brace yourselves ....Xperia T fanboys are coming


Posts: 694; Member since: May 22, 2012

isn't one s also midrange? how does this get higher than an one s


Posts: 771; Member since: Nov 16, 2011

WTF.so this is better than Xperia T?


Posts: 4764; Member since: Mar 07, 2012

Enough!!! I'm tired of hearing about how Sony does not get what it deserves...go bark somewhere. This is a mid-ranged phone for Pete's sake, and you're comparing it with T??!! I'm not a Samsung fan nor a Sony fan...nor do i hate them. But this has got to stop! I won't buy this phone but I think this is quite a fair rating... And IT DOES COME WITH JELLY BEAN out of the box!!


Posts: 771; Member since: Nov 16, 2011

rating on PA is for Both midrange and highend.there aint a special class for mid and high ends so STFU


Posts: 429; Member since: Jul 19, 2011

No, it is not the same for both mid-end and high-end. Please read this page to understand how we rate the phones: http://www.phonearena.com/howdowerate


Posts: 1; Member since: Nov 12, 2012

If that is how you rate phones please explain how you are unbias towards the GS3. The GS3 Mini is a dumb version of the GS3 model so it's clear that they are in different classes. So for it's class you'll give it a 8.9 which is ridiculous when you compare it to some other recent phones in it's class like the GS Relay 4G. You'll gave that phone a 7 when it is clearly better than GS3 Mini. If the GS Relay's bulky size is it's only flaw, guess what? It has a physical keyboard. You'll gave this a phone a 8.9 just because it looks like the GS3. Completely bias if you ask me.


Posts: 4764; Member since: Mar 07, 2012

Josephnero...do some research before you bark those comments at some one and embarrass yourself!!!


Posts: 771; Member since: Nov 16, 2011

ok.i adimt i was wrong and iam sorry about it.but you really need to learn to be polite.


Posts: 9; Member since: Jun 16, 2012

And I suppose telling people to "STFU" is polite, is it?


Posts: 4764; Member since: Mar 07, 2012

Yo, Joseph... So according to you 'STFU' is more polite than my "I'm tired of hearing about how Sony does not get what it deserves...go bark somewhere."?? Mind you, i don't use those words to anyone irrespective of how they reply to my comment. If anyone here needs to be polite here, it's YOU.


Posts: 771; Member since: Nov 16, 2011

as i said iam sorry Nathan.sorry for being impolite


Posts: 4764; Member since: Mar 07, 2012

Nevermind...forgotten and moved on. Chill...:)


Posts: 2156; Member since: Oct 17, 2011

Man, I'm a Sony fan (switched to galaxy S3) and I'm also getting tired of this silly fanboy ports. You have no sense for criteria at all. A score can't be taken literally, but in comparison with other phones of the same class. Volkswagen gold can get a five star rating being the best in class, but that doesn't make it a better car than a 4. 5 star Audi A6


Posts: 4764; Member since: Mar 07, 2012

I'm correcting your speech as "THEY have no sense of criteria at all"- you meant it that way didn't you?? :P Every review i read, i see them complaining about how Sony Xperia phones are downsized here...i agree they manufacture cool phones but everything has it's up and downs...how i wish i can explain how every phone is not the same!

XPERIA-KNIGHT unregistered

So you guys are tired of people wanting to see equality? Is that what your saying? I think its only fair to keep putting it in their face until someone says "you know what? THEY"RE RIGHT"!!


Posts: 4764; Member since: Mar 07, 2012

Won't say anything...you know better what i'm trying to say!!

XPERIA-KNIGHT unregistered

ummm no what are you trying to say? what i see is them constantly disappointed with biased reviews and them just asking for equality......whats wrong with that? This phone should most definitely have received nothing higher than a 7.5 but they feel the need to make it higher and on the same level as true flagship phones...... Now if classification is what is missing here then PA needs to jump on that and stop making it seem as if every phone is basically being compared to true high end phones when we all know this phone isnt as high end as per say....The Sony Xperia T?......maybe?


Posts: 102; Member since: Oct 20, 2011

Forget about Raw specs. Any Jellybean Android device will perform smoother than Xperia T. Maybe this was the reason for the higher score.


Posts: 547; Member since: Jun 19, 2011

8.9 really?


Posts: 637; Member since: Oct 18, 2011

Repacked Galaxy S Advance, which is not even on par with Galaxy SII, yet it bears Galaxy SIII name for marketing purposes. So much for the Samsung not cheating customers... However, it does look very good and shows how enormous screens don't make much sense, especially when you are bragging how "natural" your design is. If only we got true high-end device in this size, it would be a real miracle for the Android industry.


Posts: 981; Member since: May 27, 2011

I've also played around with this phone, and the 4-inch form factor coupled with the S III design is a treat. Jelly Bean makes for a very smooth, polished user experience, so you wouldn't notice the otherwise mediocre processor most of the time. One thing I don't like about this is that it has features like S Voice which are light years away (not in a good way) from Google Voice Search, but except for that all along a very solid device.


Posts: 2156; Member since: Oct 17, 2011

Which phone do you use? You are such a short sighted, conservative mind actually. Try having an S3 for a while and then talk about big screens making no sense. Let me remind you that first galaxy s was the same size as this and was truly a high end product.. yet it's the Galaxy s3 that had unprecedented success. The miracle you talk about already happened.

Seymur unregistered

Victor knows what he's talking about, darac.
Galaxy S III mini
  • Display 4.0" 480 x 800 pixels
  • Camera 5 MP / 0.3 MP VGA front
  • Processor STE U8420, Dual-core, 1000 MHz
  • Storage 16 GB + microSDHC
  • Battery 1500 mAh(7.83h 3G talk time)

Latest Stories