Samsung Galaxy Gear Review

Camera:


Giving the Galaxy Gear a little more depth, it’s outfitted with a 1.9-megapixel camera for all our photo and video taking requests. Now, you might think this is going to be the perfect thing to secretly take photos of things/people, but don’t get too ahead of yourself because there’s no way to disable the shutter sound that’s accompanied with each shot. With the camera app itself, it’s pretty much dry of any manual controls or shooting modes. Still, we have the sound & shot feature, which allows us to snap a shot by simply speaking the word “cheese.”

By default, the camera is set to shoot photos in a 1:1 aspect ratio; 1392 x 1392 resolution to be exact. However, there’s a 1280 x 960 option too for that typical 4:3 aspect ratio. So how’s the quality? Terrible by smartphone standards, but somewhat impressive for a watch. It’s pretty light with details, which is expected, but for what it’s worth, it does a decent job as a whole. Naturally, well lit scenes produce the best looking photos – whereas as low lighting shots are more pronounced with noise.


Likewise, we can say the same thing about its video capture quality, which is offered in either 640 x 640 or 720p resolution. Whichever you end up going with, just know that capture is limited to only 15 seconds – and nothing more. Overall, it does an okay job and serves it purpose, but audio recording tends to sound a bit screechy.



Multimedia: 


There’s a dedicated Gallery app on the Galaxy Gear, which enables us to swipe though photos and even zoom via pinch gestures. Once an image or video is selected, we have the option of deleting it, transferring it via Bluetooth to the Galaxy Note 3, or sharing it.

As we’ve stated earlier, music isn’t stored locally in the Galaxy Gear. Instead, it acts as the media controller for the content that’s stored in the Galaxy Note 3. In fact, we only have functions to reverse or forward a track, pause/play, and modify its volume. Unfortunately, we can’t specify what music player to run when using the media controller on the Galaxy Gear – so by default, it runs the standard TouchWiz player. Rather than streaming music to the Galaxy Gear so that it’s played through its internal speaker, the music controller only activates it on the Galaxy Note 3.

FEATURED VIDEO

43 Comments

1. LiquidGalaxy

Posts: 332; Member since: Jul 03, 2013

Heres another contentious con - it's pointless.

3. DaHarder

Posts: 177; Member since: Oct 10, 2009

Like Your Opinion Is The Only One That Matters... For those of us who appreciate companies (like Samsung) that truly endeavor to push technology forward rather than sitting around waiting for others to innovate device categories then STEALING Said Innovations (like Apple), the Galaxy gear is a bold first step for wearable communication. Anyway... This 'review' is so wrought with ridiculous biases and nit-picking that is almost laughable. 6.5 = WTF? Then again, this John V. character has shown time and time again his antipathy for all things Samsung. Making his opinion anything but credible. Can hardly wait to buy the Galaxy Note 3 + Galaxy Gear next week - Real Technology for Real Tech Lovers!

5. DONUT

Posts: 436; Member since: Jun 27, 2013

no, the score is fair. it barely a good/practical device to have. sure it has its benefits but its cons severely outweigh all its benefits. and dont start with the Apple stealing crap again, rmb there were so many rumors flying around about an "iWatch"? Samsung could have acted off those rumors so they wont be accused of copying again. dont let your support for the brand blind you

13. Randy_Jaeger

Posts: 2; Member since: Oct 01, 2013

What? Samsung already had smartwatches years ago so this is just building on what they did before. I know I'll be getting one with my GN3 :-)

8. mr. anderson

Posts: 92; Member since: Apr 16, 2009

For those of us who appreciate companies (like Samsung) that truly endeavor to push technology forward rather than sitting around waiting for others to innovate device categories then STEALING Said Innovations (like Apple)... wait, what? bahahahahaha!! (and im an anti-apple, android fanboy)

9. LiquidGalaxy

Posts: 332; Member since: Jul 03, 2013

Hey I love technology just as much as the next guy, and maybe the super geeks will find some use for this, but for the majority, its going to be a huge fail and is unlikely to sell in large quantities. Wearable tech will be awesome when it is done properly; this however appears to have been rushed out just to be the first on the market, by a CEO who thought he was some kind of Power Ranger when he unveiled it at the Unpacked event. I don't agree that Samsung truly push technology forward either. What have they done that has been truly revolutionary recently? They try, but everything just turns out to be a novelty that quickly wears off after a few days; and the less said about Apple stealing from Samsung the better. I hope you enjoy your Note 3 and Gear...The Note 3 looks like a good device.

21. joey_sfb

Posts: 6794; Member since: Mar 29, 2012

The gear serve me well too! Its pretty good for a first gen watch. Zoom in on John V con, Is it a CON in the first place. There no bugs in the software and that good enough for me. Even iPhone first gen has short coming remember no mms support no bluetooth support but hey! Apple fan can overlook any flaws from Apple while having a x5000 trillion magnification zoom on their competitor especially Samsung.

26. ardent1

Posts: 2000; Member since: Apr 16, 2011

The iPhone first gen was a 2G device. So what is your point? You will find most Apple users to be fair and objective. We are quite reason and won't use hyperboles. Have you looked at the iPod Nano 6th gen? Users were wearing that device as a smartphone, but it's never used to benchmark against the Gear? Why is that?

23. joey_sfb

Posts: 6794; Member since: Mar 29, 2012

Apple smart cover and LG/Samsung smart cover are different both visually and functionally. Apple smart cover just put the device to stand by which is great but Samsung LG one goes more. That's what innovation is about building on each other ideas. What Apple is trying to achieve is patent a circle and stop people from making wheels.

27. ardent1

Posts: 2000; Member since: Apr 16, 2011

joey_sfb, You really need to work on employing (sound) logic. Your arguments are specious and your use of corollaries is just dismal. You have get over your denial -- here is a fact: A jury determined that Samsung stole IP from Apple. Therefore, it is no longer a case of my opinion or your opinion -- it is a fact adjudicated in a court of law. The Gear is not the first smart watch. While it may be the first gen smart watch from Samsung, it has several short comings, and many of these short comings are design related, planning related, etc. Plus, it's a very expensive device with (currently) limited usability with other smart phones. The bottom line is Samsung should have made a better smart watch before releasing the product. Again, in Samsung's case they used the iPod Nano 6th gen as a benchmark. In contrast, when Apple released the iPhone first gen, it was about introducing a new way of thinking about the smart phone -- the role of multitouch. While Apple didn't get many things right like using 2G data speeds, etc, they got multitouch right and that soon became the standard (look at Nokia or Blackberry that couldn't adapt) and just about every flag ship smart phone can trace its form factor back to the Apple iPhone first gen. The point is there was no benchmark for Apple -- Apple invented something the world has never saw before. We understand you hate Apple, and that anger is coming through your specious arguments.

35. android_hitman unregistered

wait until apple will make a wearable tech .. 9.5 score i am sure.

11. MobileKicker

Posts: 212; Member since: Sep 19, 2013

The iWatch will get rid of it

18. SuperAndroidEvo

Posts: 4888; Member since: Apr 15, 2011

Typically I tend to stay away from the first generation of "new" technology. I bet the updated version of the Samsung Galaxy Gear will be 100% better than this "current" model. It's a good start but they are nowhere near where they want to be. See you this time next year Samsung. I am VERY content with my Samsung Galaxy Note III, that the Galaxy Gear can wait for the future model.

24. joey_sfb

Posts: 6794; Member since: Mar 29, 2012

Both watches have some water resistance in tow, which is pretty much essential for a wearable device. Sony's water resistance is much better though, as you can go swimming in your Smartwatch 2. The Galaxy Gear is limited to some rain and maybe a shower. www.gizmag.com/galaxy-gear-vs-sony-smartwatch-2-specs-comparison/29062/

32. JojoGo101

Posts: 211; Member since: Dec 17, 2012

Its a good try I will admit but the battery honestly disappoints me, I might forget to charge it one day and who is gonna feel bummed? Me!

2. Kurai unregistered

It's reeking of cons and it still gets a 6.5 . . .

4. DaHarder

Posts: 177; Member since: Oct 10, 2009

One need take into consideration who wrote the 'review' as John V. never gives any Samsung product a truly fair assessment.

6. Rongocook

Posts: 76; Member since: Sep 20, 2013

I hate this product! Half baked. I would had given 5

10. Randy_Jaeger

Posts: 2; Member since: Oct 01, 2013

Then don't buy one. There'll still be plenty of other who will.

7. amiaq

Posts: 509; Member since: Jun 30, 2012

you're ugly

15. ArtSim98

Posts: 3535; Member since: Dec 21, 2012

Jhon V.; Gear or both?

12. hmd74

Posts: 540; Member since: Jan 31, 2013

Is it worth buying? I like it's abilities but water resistance and battery are really important...

17. DaHarder

Posts: 177; Member since: Oct 10, 2009

Agreed about the water resistance for those who live in wetter climates (I don't), but as one who takes his watch off every night anyway, the full-day battery life shouldn't be an issue. It's good to see companies taking the first real steps in viable wearable technology, and as the owner of a (1st gen) Samsung smartwatch, the Pebble and Sony's first effort, the Galaxy gear looks to be the most capable yet... One well worth giving a try.

19. boosook

Posts: 1442; Member since: Nov 19, 2012

Get the sony smartwatch 2.

28. hmd74

Posts: 540; Member since: Jan 31, 2013

How about the features?

25. joey_sfb

Posts: 6794; Member since: Mar 29, 2012

www.gizmag.com/galaxy-gear-vs-sony-smartwatch-2-specs-comparison/29062/ An factual review of both Smart Watch 2 and Gear. Be your own judge.

29. vincelongman

Posts: 5720; Member since: Feb 10, 2013

Thanks, that was a far better review :)

14. SupermanayrB

Posts: 1188; Member since: Mar 20, 2012

I've seen it in person. It's a convenient device, I just can't see paying $300 for it. It's also funny how the RAZR Maxx got so many negative comments about the price from the reviewer whereas the price of this is only mentioned once. Phone Arena reviews are such BS.

16. PapaSmurf

Posts: 10457; Member since: May 14, 2012

John V's reviews are pure BS. But this x100.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.