x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options

Nokia Lumia 920 Review

0. phoneArena posted on 12 Nov 2012, 07:14

Well people, Nokia have listened intently to all the concerns and followed through appeasing the masses by incorporating a PureView camera into a Windows Phone. Culminating all into the Nokia Lumia 920, the successor to the Lumia 900 from earlier in the year, there’s a lot of excitement regarding this flagship device – but most importantly, will it actually stir enough noise to entice consumers to take grasp of it?...

This is a discussion for a review. To read the whole review, click here

posted on 12 Nov 2012, 11:00 1

62. -box- (Posts: 3991; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)

Yeah I think I've only encountered one thing worth reading from little-biddle that wasn't an apple love letter. He degrades what integrity gizmodo has even moreso

posted on 12 Nov 2012, 10:50 6

57. Seanburns (Posts: 4; Member since: 30 Oct 2012)

Phone Arena if you have checked the latest new on this phone you will know that Nokia has said that they will release a new update fix for the camera. They admitted that the daytime focus issues and softness was the post processing of images. Same thing happened when the 900 was released and then was fixed in an update so will be ok once solved. And please stop comparing iphone display with this. The iphone screen is pale in comparison and no as sharp. Iphone is over rated.

posted on 12 Nov 2012, 11:23 2

71. -box- (Posts: 3991; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)

Nokia is quite good with the software updates. I got the 900 the week before it was officially on sale (I pre-ordered it). Not only did I get the phone for free for the pre-order, Nokia also did an update for something I didn't have a problem with, AND a $100 billing credit on top of it, so I didn't have a bill for a month and a much smaller one the month after!

posted on 12 Nov 2012, 10:56 3

59. Seanburns (Posts: 4; Member since: 30 Oct 2012)

I played with an 820 today and even the screen on that was gorgeous. I also played with the HTC 8X and it looked drab the screen did compared to the Nokia

posted on 12 Nov 2012, 11:17 2

66. Miley_3d (Posts: 16; Member since: 02 Oct 2012)

Nokia Lumia 920 is made for me!!!

posted on 12 Nov 2012, 11:18

67. ajin1989 (Posts: 4; Member since: 12 Nov 2012)

Whether an AT&T off contract phone bought for $ 450 will work in other countries (India)?
i mean whether it will be locked ?

450 Dollars means almost 25000 INR
Lumia 900 itself costs 31000 INR here

posted on 12 Nov 2012, 11:26 2

72. -box- (Posts: 3991; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)

Yes, it is locked to AT&T. The Lumia 900 was impossible to unlock until October 7th (6 mos after it came out), and the 920 (and 820) are looking to be the same. If you want it unlocked, you'll have to (and this is Nokia's statement from a chat I had with their online customer care team) buy it from Amazon at full price, which I think is $600. $450 is for AT&T-only locked device

posted on 12 Nov 2012, 11:49

77. ajin1989 (Posts: 4; Member since: 12 Nov 2012)

600 $ = 33k INR!!
i will wait for it to release in india

Reports are saying that it will be costing around 30k to 35 k
and will be released in November end. Hope they will fix the softness in camera by that time and no other will be able to compete with it

Some says that battery drains very rapidly and phone gets hotter if Nokia drive is on.

posted on 12 Nov 2012, 11:22

70. b1acktiger (Posts: 223; Member since: 19 May 2012)

i still wonder why microsoft choose htc windows phone 8x as the signature device ? there must be something behind this decision. What ?

posted on 12 Nov 2012, 11:29 1

73. -box- (Posts: 3991; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)

"Signature" doesn't mean "flagship". There are a number of signature Windows 7 devices, but they are mid- to mid-high range, not high-range (i.e. Sony, Alienware, FX, etc). It just means that it is running a "pure" Microsoft experience. Nokias don't get that because of the Nokia extras. It's a bit odd because the HTCs get extra software things too.

posted on 12 Nov 2012, 15:46

97. b1acktiger (Posts: 223; Member since: 19 May 2012)

HTC Locations, Photo Enhancer, Converter, Flash Light is there as HTC extras+ at& t or other carrier apps. No OEM has the right to alter the WP 8, how the user experience is going to change hence its not open source os ? Its still the same WP 8 except some bloatware in it.

posted on 12 Nov 2012, 11:31 2

74. i_hate_my_life (banned) (Posts: 24; Member since: 17 Dec 2010)

Lumia became more Lumia on its own, and less Windows. they lost grip on those devices.

posted on 12 Nov 2012, 11:44 1

76. snowgator (Posts: 3604; Member since: 19 Jan 2011)

Wow. Happy with both the write up and the score. The 920 is a true attempt at a premium device. Could ask for no more without a stronger set of features baked in or at least in the store like options for keyboard choices, more detailed photo editors instead of just basic ones, some other choices that WP still is behind in the Android and iOS market.

But these choices will come, and the development is strong. What WP needs now is converts, people to give it a try. The 920, 820/810/822, and the 8X offer some opportunities for that. The 920 truly CAN stand next to the GS2, iPhone 5, and the top end devices from Motorola and Android HTC offerings. At least now it is a fair fight, where with WP7 it truly wasn't.

posted on 12 Nov 2012, 12:57

85. rsxl5 (Posts: 65; Member since: 05 Sep 2012)

Well, have Lumia 900 and pictures quality is worse that the one I have on my older phone.

WM lacks VPN so forget about secure connection that is a must for a business phone.... more than a year passed and M$ is not able to implement it in WM7.5 and from what I see WM8 is missing it as well.

For me Lumia 900 I bought is the very last WM mobile. Hate to say that but it's better to go even with iPhone that can do a magic trick of your data securing.

Funny but instead of L900 I should have purchase N808 ; at least photos would be amazing (despite of Symbiant OS).

Probably in a year or so will go for Samsung Galaxy class.

posted on 12 Nov 2012, 13:02

86. rsxl5 (Posts: 65; Member since: 05 Sep 2012)

One more thing is e-mail client....

It's configured as POP3 and behaves like IMAP. No way to mark messages so you can keep them ; they just disappear from Inbox after a while when deleted from server (why not to keep them all on the server? my database is about 8GB so they stay on the server for a week and it's the reason I use POP3 so they will stay on the client as long as needed).

posted on 12 Nov 2012, 14:15 1

90. snowgator (Posts: 3604; Member since: 19 Jan 2011)

Your labeling it "WM7" instead of "WP 7" is strange for an owner of a WP device. Just sayin.

posted on 12 Nov 2012, 19:43

110. rsxl5 (Posts: 65; Member since: 05 Sep 2012)

You right, I wrote WM and should be WP.
Long time ago I did own before WM (Mio a701) and I was very pleased with that one and it hard encoded in my brain.

Sorry, for mistake.

posted on 12 Nov 2012, 14:20 1

91. -box- (Posts: 3991; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)

Lumias don't run Windows Mobile. They run Windows PHONE. Totally different OS.
As for VPN, I thought WP8 allows for that?

Also, Lumia 900 takes good pictures. Not up to the 808PV or N8 level, of course, but good for a camera phone. The Nokia Camera Extras free app helps with photo settings and quality.

posted on 12 Nov 2012, 19:59

111. rsxl5 (Posts: 65; Member since: 05 Sep 2012)

As for pictures I can't agree about L900 (same about my wife's L800). SE ARC is superior despite of its age.

Try to take a picture of a business card in semi or bad light conditions. If you don't fire flash it's darkly and hard to read ; if you fire flash center of a business card is OK but corners are black (it's a heavy ellipse shape) looming above the picture.

Checked it on two L900 and my wife's L800 all was the same.

If you want me I can post later on same photos taken with SE ARC and L900 so you could see the difference.

Hoped for VPN in WP8 as well ; as for what I read there is none and I don't want to wait maybe a year or two before it gets there (if).

posted on 12 Nov 2012, 12:05 3

78. fervid (Posts: 183; Member since: 22 Nov 2011)

I'd agree the camera let me down a little, but they have released a few "lenses" the last couple days and are working on a software fix for some of the other issues. Most of the faults I have with the phone are WinPhone features lacking though and nothing with the hardware. I disagree about the speaker and call issues though. My calls are all clear and the speaker output is the best I've heard in any phone. I have no need for headphones and my music is clear too.

posted on 12 Nov 2012, 12:29 1

80. muhsen (Posts: 281; Member since: 07 Jun 2012)

although, i am maybe nitpicking but i don't think "this isn’t the most cutting-edge or compelling device in recent memory" is really true. excluding the galaxy note 2(better or even with lumia 920 with respect to ur opinion), i don't see any device better than the lumia 920.

posted on 12 Nov 2012, 12:43 3

81. Jyakotu (Posts: 852; Member since: 12 Dec 2008)

As I read this review and see that Verizon is getting a Nokia Lumia phone, my rage for Sprint only grows. I'm still wondering how in the hell they want to take a chance with Firefox OS, but not even give Windows Phone 8 a chance? The HTC Arrive was their HIGHEST rated customer satisfaction device on their website. Sprint could have at least got one of the HTC 8 phones to replace the Arrive, BUT NO!!! /endrant

As for the Lumia 920, I love the color choices, the display, and the Windows Phone UI itself. Nokia did an excellent job on this device. I'm loving Windows 8, especially using the "Modern" UI, and as much as I've invested with the Android ecosystem, I would definitely consider switching to Windows Phone in the future.

posted on 12 Nov 2012, 12:52 2

82. pureviewuser (Posts: 501; Member since: 11 Nov 2012)

I still prefer a Symbian phone

posted on 12 Nov 2012, 13:18

87. i_hate_my_life (banned) (Posts: 24; Member since: 17 Dec 2010)

ok good for u, who cares

posted on 12 Nov 2012, 15:48 1

98. -box- (Posts: 3991; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)

I've used Symbian for the last 5 or 6 years, and I thought I couldn't stand being without it. After I got my Lumia 900 unlocked from AT&T and set up on T-Mobile I started leaving my Nokia 701 behind at home. I don't even miss it anymore, which still suprisises me.I still keep it because it has its uses (USB OTG most notably), but once more Symbian features are integrated with WP8 I'll be putting it up for sale. Now if I had an 808 PureView, I might still take that with me every day, but I don't, so...

posted on 12 Nov 2012, 15:55 1

99. -box- (Posts: 3991; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)

WP is just so much more user friendly and does what I want quickly and effectively, and it's pleasant and FUN to use. While I'll grant I did have some "oh, wow, cool!" epiphanies and experiences with Symbian (and Android, to a lesser extent), those events became fewer and farther between. Belle helped a LOT, but with rumors that Carla and Donna were going to be stillborn or aborted, I decided to switch to the platform Nokia is publically behind, and is supporting openly in the US.

posted on 12 Nov 2012, 17:36 1

103. chaoticrazor (Posts: 2347; Member since: 28 Aug 2012)

the only problem i have with wp8 is the fact it cant yet support the kind of camera on my 808. id switch in an instant if they brought out a 808 pureview running wp8

posted on 13 Nov 2012, 01:33 1

114. rsxl5 (Posts: 65; Member since: 05 Sep 2012)

Bought L900 just to try it and was going to buy L920 at once it's on the market if it has 808 superb camera. Wel.. it dosn't.

I must say that do like L900 experience (calls are clear, battery gets me mostly through a day and it works mostly as expected), however, I can't give a pass on:
a) Implemented e-mail client (K9 on Android is 2-3 levels above what you find on WP),

b) Lack of VPN (1. Encrypted transmission, 2. I do live in China).

Looks like the rest of major bumps (ie: general sound volume system, interface limitations, Skype notifications, etc) is to be fixed in WP8 but due to above (and a camera that I do not believe to be as good as advertised) I'm going to pass on WP mobiles.

Ehh...if only it's fixed and next Lumia gets 808 camera I'm on it. Why do people want to get the slimes mobile (or are told they want it).

posted on 13 Nov 2012, 07:31 1

118. chaoticrazor (Posts: 2347; Member since: 28 Aug 2012)

It does seem wp8 has all that it needs and more, just for me personally the camera is a deal breaker. I can't go from the best camera phone to second best.

And true, I like a phone with bulk to it and a good weight,never caught the phone must be thinner bug and when people state the thinness of a phone as a feature it just shows there's not much else on offer

But a wp8 808 pureview would be my next device in a heartbeat.nothing matches the 808's camera

posted on 12 Nov 2012, 12:52

83. pureviewuser (Posts: 501; Member since: 11 Nov 2012)

I still prefer a Symbian phone

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories