Just like the DROID BIONIC before it, the DROID RAZR has one fantastic calling quality. So if you happen to be a chatterbox, you'll definitely find the handset more than ideal for your yapping needs. Not only are voice distinctive and robust on both ends of the line, but there is no evidence of any background noise or static heard through the earpiece. Additionally, the earpiece's volume output is strong enough to make conversations very audible to the ear. Switching over to the speakerphone, we experience an exact performance as it's able to whip up the same clear tones and strong volume.

Stricken with the same case of lost connectivity with 4G LTE, we're not all that surprised seeing that it's prevalent on previous 4G LTE devices that we've checked out from Verizon. However, it's only pronounced when we're indoors, and it doesn't seem to be affected when we're outside. In terms of overall signal strength, it's decent as it's able to put up an average amount of bars in high coverage areas. We didn't experience any dropped calls during our testing in the greater Philadelphia region.

We can ponder over how Motorola is even able to pack a 1,780 mAh battery into its shell, but they somehow managed to do just that. Even though it's rated for 12.5 hours of talk time, we're still left desiring for more battery life seeing that it reaches the same mark as the DROID BIONIC before it. Specifically, it's able to pump out approximately 10 hours of battery life on normally usage, which isn't anything spectacular, but still better than the mark reached by other 4G LTE smartphones. Obviously, light users can get almost close to a day's worth of battery life on a single charge, but it's likely to require nightly charging.


Bringing us back to memory lane, there's no arguing that the original Motorola RAZR was an iconic device that's seemingly forever ingrained into our minds, but on top of that, it showed us the kind of ingenuity behind Motorola. As the story goes, the RAZR eventually exhausted its ride, but Motorola managed to reignite that fire with the original Motorola DROID from a couple years ago. Now that the stage is set for a complete makeover, the Motorola DROID RAZR is by far the most compelling handset to step into the competitive landscape in recent memory.

In a time when high-end smartphones seem to be a dime a dozen, the Motorola DROID RAZR is able to captivate our attention above all others thanks to the brilliant engineering marvel that it beholds. For something so thin and light, it's almost impossible to even fathom that it's remarkably strengthened to offer superior durability over other contemporary smartphones. Meanwhile, it doesn't compromise on other things, which really amazes us even more knowing that it's choked full of cutting edge hardware to make it literally future proof in every way possible.

Indeed, it's not 100% in all categories, like in the video recording and battery life department, but it's able to show it's added worth on the software side – such as Webtop, MOTOCAST, and Smart Actions. As much as some of us are polarized with Ice Cream Sandwich on board with the upcoming Samsung Galaxy Nexus, there should be no cause for alarm because it's announced to be coming to the DROID RAZR in the future either way. Naturally, some people will still find its price to be on the expensive side, but it's more than justified by its performance, premium construction, and bountiful hardware. Going forward, every handset released will need to live up to the mark established by the DROID RAZR, because it's absolutely, undeniably, and remarkably a piece of technology that smashes the perception of what we consider to be a top-notch smartphone.

Software version of the reviewed unit:
Android version:  2.3.4
Build number: 5.5.1_84_DBN-55
Kernel version:

Motorola DROID RAZR Video Review:


  • Stand-out design, materials and build quality
  • Clear calling quality
  • 4G LTE connectivity with great speeds
  • Motorola Webtop functionality and microHDMI


  • Not running Android 4.0 ICS out of the box
  • Screen is great, but with so-so pixel density
  • Camera and camcorder are not top-notch

PhoneArena Rating:


User Rating:

25 Reviews



1. HTCiscool

Posts: 449; Member since: Jul 16, 2011

Sexy! Finally a Motorola phone made correctly. I'd say a fitting score. I think qHD on 4.3'' is fine and the ICS update will be on the way.

3. HTCiscool

Posts: 449; Member since: Jul 16, 2011

By made correctly, I don't mean build quality cuz Moto is top notch in that area.

152. Mark_Washington

Posts: 8; Member since: Sep 05, 2011

I like this phone! Very solid build. The metal edges have a good feel and are easy to grip, the camera bulge is not too protrusive, it feels very thin and light in the pocket, and it's pleasantly fast in CPU and downloads. Call quality seems quite good, natural sounding voices, much better in this respect than my previous Droid X. Camera is actually pretty good. Didn't have great expectations after seeing poor low-light performance in Photon, but this doesn't seem to display the speckle that predominated the Photon. Multi-shot (six shot) is a nice feature. Reasonably fast shutter. Overall pleased. Things I'd change: - The pixelation on the screen is very annoying. Text is much harder to read than on iPhone. Fringing is visible on all straight lines. A white background has diagonal, crisscrossed lines. In the case of black lines on a white background, some borders have red edges, some blue. This is presumably due to the alternating RGBG/BGRG pixel pattern. As a result, small text is often illegible. The screen changes colors off axis, especially past about 45 degrees it shifts everything towards green. Not nearly as good as Samsung sAMOLED screens in that respect. So, the display is the biggest letdown on this device. -Battery life is short, expect to recharge every chance you get. Take it off the charger and read a few news articles and it's down to 70%. Presumably worse if doing games or video or nav. Rough estimate is it will last about 3 hours with normal use, and that's with 1780 mAhr. -Power button is placed awkwardly, and is nearly flush with the phone, but the saving grace is that it has a distinctive ridged feel that can be used to find it by running a finger along the edge. Even with these drawbacks, still like it better than other current Android phones, e.g., rate it over the GSII for 540 vs 480 pixel screen resolution and higher quality materials and overall better design. But please, put a decent 720 pixel screen in the next Razr. I suggest check for best deal before you will buy the RAZR at:

2. som

Posts: 768; Member since: Nov 10, 2009

Is the thickest point is 9 mm?

5. arcq12

Posts: 733; Member since: Oct 13, 2011

doesnt matter.. this thing is thin as hell!

52. sudhar131998

Posts: 63; Member since: Sep 06, 2011

hell is thin? or was it just a figure of speech cause i don't know but i got a question for you , have you visited hell?

84. Sinaps

Posts: 60; Member since: Jul 27, 2010

Don't be a smart ass, you know what he meant.

87. Nathan

Posts: 85; Member since: Jul 14, 2011

The thickest point is 10.6mm while the thinnest is at 7.1mm.

4. biophone

Posts: 1994; Member since: Jun 15, 2011

Dang this phone has disappointed me because of the camera hump and the bad battery life. The rezound won't have good battery life either I can tell already but hopefully the nexus can step up in that department.

56. KingKurogiii

Posts: 5713; Member since: Oct 23, 2011

how will the Nexus step up? it has a similar sized battery and it has an HDSA display w/ everything the Razr has here.

83. biophone

Posts: 1994; Member since: Jun 15, 2011

Yeah i am saying hopefully but its looks as if it will be a while till we get a lte phone with good battery life. What i would have rather moto done is make the phone thicker get rid of the hump and stick a bigger battery in ther say 2000 mah. The rezound has has no chance at decent battery with a 1.5 ghz proccesor 720p screen and small battery.

149. Synack

Posts: 688; Member since: Jul 05, 2011

They're already saying the Nexus has incredible battery life for a 4G LTE phone. Probably a combination of hardware optimization and several other small factors. I believe I read on here or somewhere else that it is capable of 12 hours on full brightness and constant usage and running of apps. That's pretty amazing. Grab a 4G to 3G widget/app and you should be seeing this baby last 2+ days on normal use.

74. jroc74

Posts: 6023; Member since: Dec 30, 2010

You say bad battery life...and even tho it didnt reach 12.5 hours talk time in this review.....just comparing it to the Bionic and saying its similar is nothing to sneeze at. The Bionic currently has the best overall battery life of all the LTE phones on Verizon. And the talk time is the biggest difference.

88. NotoNeo

Posts: 2; Member since: Nov 08, 2011

The pictures make the hump look bigger than it actually is. In person, it's no bigger than an iPhone 4. At least that's how it looks. Trust me, see it in person and you will be taken aback by how thin the device really is.

6. HTCiscool

Posts: 449; Member since: Jul 16, 2011

I really can't decide between ths and the Rezound.

23. willardcw4

Posts: 170; Member since: Oct 01, 2011

I'd say the Rezound over the RAZR... the screen being 720p on the Rezound is a big deal and is a lot more 'future proof'. With that much of a difference in ppi between these two phones you should be able to notice the difference in the store when you're handling them.

57. KingKurogiii

Posts: 5713; Member since: Oct 23, 2011

how the hell is it more future proof than the Razr? because of the HD LCD Display? the Rezound is weaker than the Razr which means it's not as future proof.

143. leftheodo

Posts: 108; Member since: Oct 21, 2011

How is the rezound weaker than the Razr? The screen of the razr with its pentile technology is not that good! Take a look at the review and see the backround of the video being watched on the phone!

7. Thomas5.3

Posts: 37; Member since: Oct 30, 2011

Come on how can you give this phone an 9. Ofcourse the design is awesome but the screen is really outdated with its low pixel density, and the camera isnt that good either. If This gets an 9 what would the HTC Rezound get than, a 10? because the screen is one of the most important things on a phone almost everything you do with your phone goes trough your screen

8. HTCiscool

Posts: 449; Member since: Jul 16, 2011

Clearly you have not read thre review. Two words: SUPER AMOLED. 256 ppi is quite alright. this thing is also amazingly thin so it deserves what it got.

11. Thomas5.3

Posts: 37; Member since: Oct 30, 2011

is quite allright worth a 9? a screen is so essential for a phone. and with this "retina quality" coming with the rezound and nexus on android devices im just asking myself what grades these phones would get knowing that the one also already has ICS and the other one 1.5 processor

15. Muhannad

Posts: 455; Member since: Sep 20, 2011

Would you rather have them review the Galaxy S II again and give it a 8/10 because the pixel density in that phone is much lower.

93. gtrxman

Posts: 137; Member since: Sep 10, 2011

Exactly. On a 4" screen, you have to put your eye right up to the screen to see any difference. Everyone is so caught up in specs, they miss the fact that it's the whole package that matters. It's unlikely that you will be watching anything on this phone that will require such density. It's not a flat screen TV people, it's a phone.

112. harold1

Posts: 1; Member since: Nov 08, 2011

gtrxman, Do you ever read text on the web? higher resolution is always nicer.. and the whole package on this is pretty good

16. HTCiscool

Posts: 449; Member since: Jul 16, 2011

Would you rather have 340ppi S-LCD or 260 ppi Super AMOLED? The OMAP chip, even though its not the 4460, is more powerful than the S3 in the Rezound.

18. Muhannad

Posts: 455; Member since: Sep 20, 2011

I would go with the Rezound, mainly because of HTC's sexy design, amazing pixel density, and HTC Sense. Also, the Super LCD on every new HTC phone is much sharper than the one's you'd find on the Sensation.

94. gtrxman

Posts: 137; Member since: Sep 10, 2011

What makes the Rezound sexy? Not criticizing, just asking as I find it quite boring.

27. ngo2dd

Posts: 896; Member since: Jul 08, 2011

I will take the S-LCD 340 ppi any day. It is a lot sharper and it is not pentile, even in the video you can see the pixel.

31. jackhammeR

Posts: 1548; Member since: Oct 17, 2011

WTF Screen is outdated??? Low pixel density??? Nexus has 720p but it is pentile so for me it is quite a rubbish. Do you really think that you would be able to see a difference between RAZR screen and Rezound which additional has weaker S3 compared to OMAP?

35. Thomas5.3

Posts: 37; Member since: Oct 30, 2011

Yes you can definitely see the difference till 300 PPI. And since i use my phone alot for reading (books, Internet and emails) the screen is a dealbreaker for me.

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

  • Display 4.3" 540 x 960 pixels
  • Camera 8 MP / 1.3 MP front
  • Processor TI OMAP4430, Dual-core, 1200 MHz
  • Storage 16GB + microSDHC
  • Battery 1780 mAh(12.50h talk time)

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.
FCC OKs Cingular's purchase of AT&T Wireless