Call Quality

Motorola knows radios, and it shows

During our testing of the Moto G4 and G4 Plus, we evaluated the handsets on AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon alike. While each phone proved fully capable of making and receiving pleasantly intelligible calls, it seems that the largest factor in voice-call quality wasn't the phones themselves, but the network on which we were operating. That's not exactly the best news for users who for one reason or another are bound to a particular carrier, but we're still happy the hardware itself isn't the limiting factor in our ability to move between them.

Battery Life

Flagship-level (and sometimes besting) endurance

No matter whether you go with the G4 or the Plus version, you're getting a phone with a good-sized 3,000mAh battery. And even with the move to a 5.5-inch screen this year, that's still ample power to get you through a day of heavy operation without running out of charge.

Individual batteries of the same spec will certainly vary in their performance, and while these two phones are largely identically equipped (at least in terms of factors that could influence power consumption), our tests showed the G4 outlasting the G4 Plus by a little over an hour – could the extra 2GB of RAM really have that large an impact on power needs? Even still, the 7 hours and 30 minutes of screen-on time the G4 Plus held out for in our custom tests is all kinds of respectable, even beating some of this year's flagships.

Recharging is acceptably fast, and with the help of the included TurboPower adapters, both phones were able to fully restore their batteries in under two hours. The main benefit to TurboPower, though, is getting a few hours worth of operation after just a short 15-minute charge, and it has less of an impact as you get further and further along in the charging process.

Battery life (hours) Higher is better
Motorola Moto G4 8h 48 min (Good)
Motorola Moto G4 Plus 7h 30 min (Average)
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) 9h 57 min (Good)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 12h 36 min (Excellent)
Charging time (minutes) Lower is better
Motorola Moto G4 110
Motorola Moto G4 Plus 113
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) 100
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 153


Both the Moto G4 and Moto G4 Plus are some well-done mid-rangers, marrying performance that should be adequate for casual users with some very attractive pricing.

But a lot of companies give us well-executed phones; are the new Moto G4s anything special? Well, that's sadly to say a bit of a “no.” The Moto Gs in general have been experiencing a sort of drift over the years, and while they're still a cheap alternative to Motorola's flagships, they no longer feel like they're doing much that's unique to stand out in the mid-ranger space.

That said, we really appreciate the variety of storage and memory options, especially for the low, low prices Motorola is charging for those upgrades. Two hundred dollars is a sweet starting point (even if it is a little pricier than last year's Moto G) and fifty bucks extra for a higher-res camera and fingerprint scanner isn't a bad premium – moving further still to four times the storage and double the RAM is an even easier $50 upgrade beyond that.

And while each of those upgrades seems like a sensible decision, the Moto G starts looking a little different as we push up to the $300 level. Here the phone starts competing not just with other lower mid-rangers, but affordably priced value propositions; is it worth spending another $100 and moving to something like the OnePlus 3? That Snapdragon 617 may be alright for many uses, but it's also a troubling bottleneck on a phone that lets you upgrade so many other components.

Maybe if the Moto G4 Plus let us graduate to a speedier chip, or if things like the fingerprint scanner were standard even on the entry-level $200 G4, the phones would compare slightly more favorably to the rest of the Android pack. Right now they're still both pretty good phones – they just exist in a world where some better-equipped models are just around the corner.

They're both good handsets worth picking up if they happen to deliver exactly what you're looking for. But with so many options out there, it's worth your while to consider all the alternatives before sinking the cash on this year's Moto G.

Software version of the review unit: Android 6.0.1; Build Number: MPJ24.139-48/49


  • Great value for a mid-range phablet
  • Quality, affordable upgrades over the base model
  • Battery life sufficient to get through a heavy day
  • Really well done cross-carrier support


  • Best-equipped G4 Plus faces tough competition from
  • Snapdragon 617 struggles under load
  • Neither camera option manages to blow us away
  • Large, light phone risks feeling a little cheap

PhoneArena Rating:




36. gino76ph

Posts: 3; Member since: Jul 15, 2017

My Moto G4 screen has cracked broken after it fell face first flat on the pavement. The race is on to find a replacement ASAP. As much as I want the new G5S phone it STILL lacks a compass ( a necessity for me), no USB Type-C, no water resistance powers. I need a phone with the very "basic' of requirements as follows: 1. Compass/e-compass &/or magnetometer 2. USB Type-C (not compulsary) 3. 4.7" screen & above (preferably 5.1" & above) 4. Faster Cat-6 4G LTE speeds 5. A speaker with a loudness of 75db or above 6. Screen brightness of 500nits & above 7. 3GB RAM or above 8. Cameras which takes natural-looking photo, great dynamic range, contrast, less overexposed photos and and great in low-light 9. Under £300 or €300. I'm open to suggestions from some Chines phones.

35. nnylip

Posts: 1; Member since: Sep 28, 2016

I've had a g4 plus for about 2 months. Great Phone. Observations: Pulled the sim out of verizon moto m and worked perfectly. Read reviews saying it overheats, have not experienced this. I have found that the camera is TERRIBLE in low light and would question whether the plus is worth the extra bucks for the camera (which is why I bought the plus over the regular). It is a large phone, not sure why Lenovo didn't go with a 5.2 or similar. CPU seems perfectly adequate (I author a compute and DB intensive hybrid app). Having SD card is great and a must for me (128gb inserted). Batttery life is awesome, easily get 2 days. This phone questions the whole need for flagships costing 2.5x as much.

33. fj185

Posts: 1; Member since: Jul 20, 2016

What other phones in this price range offer CDMA and GSM?

29. Arch_Fiend

Posts: 3951; Member since: Oct 03, 2015

They should have gone with the SD650 and raised the price of every model by $25-50

30. Veteater

Posts: 59; Member since: Aug 04, 2015

No they shouldn't. That's what the Moto Z Play is for, with its SD625, which is in the league of the SD650 and SD652.

32. Arch_Fiend

Posts: 3951; Member since: Oct 03, 2015

Ummm no! the SD625 can't touch the 650 or 652. the adreno 510 and arm A72 cores in the SD650s destroys the adreno 506 and arm A53 cores found in the SD625. Look at it like this, the 625 is the replacement for the 617 and the 650s replace the 808.

24. KingSam

Posts: 1563; Member since: Mar 13, 2016

What about the overheating reported by other reviews? Please comment on that.

28. Veteater

Posts: 59; Member since: Aug 04, 2015

Updates were sent out quite a while ago to patch the overheating and performance problems, like the patches sent out to patch the nexus 5x's problems.

17. TrackPhoneUser

Posts: 256; Member since: Oct 21, 2015

Seesh now it's bad to be light weight. Btw they should do a new type of battery test: Pokémon Go battery test

18. MingLiangChen

Posts: 329; Member since: Jul 06, 2012

lol, Pokemon Go, the new battery benchmarking standard

16. zeeBomb

Posts: 2318; Member since: Aug 14, 2014

Ehhhh. Dunno how the G4 plus got less battery usage then the G4 as they're both practically the same device. I feel like the scores were averaged out between the two: Separate reviews on both would have been better.

15. siddharthayadav202

Posts: 286; Member since: Apr 23, 2016

And I think the phone to compete for G4 plus is J7 2016 not A7. I wish G4 and Plus had 720p display. Gaming perf is poor.

22. marorun

Posts: 5029; Member since: Mar 30, 2015

Sd617 is downgrade from 615? Had no issue playing games on my moto x play..

23. MingLiangChen

Posts: 329; Member since: Jul 06, 2012

Maybe you can try running adb commands to switch it (whatever it is) to 720p before playing games, then switch it back for normal use.

13. siddharthayadav202

Posts: 286; Member since: Apr 23, 2016

SD 617 for 1080p display sucks.

11. theguy2345

Posts: 1216; Member since: Jun 24, 2014

It's either this or the zenfone 3, which outspecs this phone on nearly every front. So I'm really leaning toward Asus right now.

10. waqas.mehmood2

Posts: 55; Member since: Nov 21, 2015

Average phone

7. Telemike

Posts: 45; Member since: Nov 30, 2012

Nexus 5X seems a better buy with 808 over the 617 and faster udpates direct from Google. Prices have dropped on 32GB model (I got mine from Fi for $249).

8. MingLiangChen

Posts: 329; Member since: Jul 06, 2012

If I had unlimited data (which I don't because I suck) to upload things onto cloud, then a Nexus is considerable.

9. libra89

Posts: 2357; Member since: Apr 15, 2016

And it's smaller, at least in screen size anyway. These Moto Gs seem to be okay, but why are both choices just big only? :/

21. marorun

Posts: 5029; Member since: Mar 30, 2015

Nexus 5x has much more performance issue than this g4...

25. sebbellic01

Posts: 305; Member since: May 03, 2016

Not anymore, I heard most of them have been patched with monthly updates

6. ibend

Posts: 6747; Member since: Sep 30, 2014

"But with so many options out there, it's worth your while to consider all the alternatives before sinking the cash on this year's Moto G." many option? like what? did any of $200-$300 smartphone this year get score higher than 7/10?

26. uzimafioso

Posts: 469; Member since: Jul 15, 2014

A display better than the iPhone 6s Plus, adequate sound over the speaker as well as the audio jack, vanilla Android experience with support promised upto Android O (slower but it's there), a fast responsive fingerprint scanner, good cameras, excellent call quality and it's priced from $200-300. Yes definitely a 7 by PA.

3. libra89

Posts: 2357; Member since: Apr 15, 2016


1. deftozzz

Posts: 14; Member since: Jul 16, 2015

Meanwhile dxomark scored them pretty high...

2. ibend

Posts: 6747; Member since: Sep 30, 2014

meanwhile iPhone6s beat S7 in other article.. we know how reliable their camera test

4. MingLiangChen

Posts: 329; Member since: Jul 06, 2012

Happy to see the blurring corners in photos from last year's models are gone.

5. ibend

Posts: 6747; Member since: Sep 30, 2014

-deleted- wrong post :D

12. siddharthayadav202

Posts: 286; Member since: Apr 23, 2016

I have used G4 plus and Galaxy J7 2016. J7 has better camera and G4 plus had me a bit disappointed mainly due to so high DXOMARK. I do not trust Dxomark now.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.
FCC OKs Cingular's purchase of AT&T Wireless