Apple iPhone 7 Review
Interface and Functionality
With evolving 3D Touch support, some attractively redone apps, and an improved lockscreen experience, iOS 10 delivers
The new iOS 10 landed for existing Apple devices ahead of the iPhone 7's release, giving us a head start at checking out all the new functionality bundled with the company's latest operating system refresh.
Other changes include expanded 3D Touch controls, powerful new lockscreen widgets, Siri connectivity for third-party apps, and new versions of familiar apps like Maps, Music, Photos, and News. Apple's not shy about bringing its new iOS features to existing hardware, either, and even new functionality like raise-to-wake is supported on last year's phones. And building off the eyestrain-reducing Night Shift of iOS 9.3, Apple implements a new Bedtime mode in the system clock that keeps trying to gently nudge us towards healthier sleep patterns.
There's not one stand-out feature or new app that really defines iOS 10 – though for a certain Snapchat-loving cadre of users, the tricked-out Messages is probably the coolest thing Apple's ever done – but these smaller enhancements are so numerous, varied, and consistently well executed that it's hard not to love what Apple's come up with.
Processor and Memory
Fast as all get-out, and with storage to spare
Fans might love Apple smartphones for their design, easy-to-use interface, or rich ecosystem of software and media, but some blistering performance doesn't hurt matters any. With the iPhone 7, Apple's introducing its latest processor, the quad-core 64-bit A10. Well, not just the A10, either – Apple's giving its new chip a nickname, as we meet the A10 Fusion.
That naming change should hint that we're dealing with something special, and our testing generally seems to support that idea. Various benchmarks show performance improving in the 20 to 40 percent range over the iPhone 6s, and while we didn't measure a huge change in graphics performance, the trend is certainly upwards.
More than just powering the speediest iPhone to date, the A10 pairs high-performance cores with high-efficiency cores, helping the iPhone 7 to squeeze all it can out of the handset's battery. We're going to circle back around to battery life a bit later in this review, but spoiler alert: it's great. And while a higher-capacity battery has something to do with that, the new A10 clearly plays a role, too.
Apple once again gives its smaller iPhone 2GB of RAM (there is an upgrade to 3GB this year, but only for the iPhone 7 Plus), and instead we see the move to higher capacity play out with the handset's flash storage.
|
AnTuTu Higher is better
|
Apple iPhone 7
168795
Apple iPhone 6s
59075
Samsung Galaxy S7
136695
HTC 10
131088
|
|
JetStream Higher is better
|
Apple iPhone 7
144.71
Apple iPhone 6s
118.91
Samsung Galaxy S7
62.049
HTC 10
46.453
|
|
GFXBench T-Rex HD on-screen Higher is better
|
Apple iPhone 7
57.3
Apple iPhone 6s
59.1
Samsung Galaxy S7
53
HTC 10
47
|
|
GFXBench Manhattan 3.1 on-screen Higher is better
|
Apple iPhone 7
59.1
Apple iPhone 6s
56.1
Samsung Galaxy S7
29
HTC 10
13
|
|
Basemark OS II Higher is better
|
Apple iPhone 7
3355
Apple iPhone 6s
2139
Samsung Galaxy S7
1943
HTC 10
1806.33
|
|
Geekbench 4 single-core Higher is better
|
Apple iPhone 7
3464
Apple iPhone 6s
2373
Samsung Galaxy S7
1840
HTC 10
1419
|
|
Geekbench 4 multi-core Higher is better
|
Apple iPhone 7
5605
Apple iPhone 6s
3979
Samsung Galaxy S7
5462
HTC 10
2692
|
The big news here is that 16GB is officially dead, and the starting storage capacity for the iPhone 7 is a healthy 32GB. Even sales of the 6s and 6s Plus are losing their 16GB option, and only the iPhone SE will continue to offer such meager storage.
This is also the first time we're seeing Apple tie storage choices to another phone hardware option: in this case, color. The shiny new jet black finish isn't just the hardest-to-come-by iPhone 7 color, it's also restricted to models with 128GB or 256GB storage.
That's especially interesting, as it suggests Apple may be using the big markup it charges on flash storage to offset any added expense implementing the snazzy jet black color requires. Right now that's relatively unobjectionable, but will we see future iPhones where new hardware features or actual phone functionality is tied to certain storage tiers?
Connectivity
Apple future-proofs the iPhone 7 with support for next-gen LTE speeds
We're at a point now with cellular technologies where it's easy to take a lot for granted. Band support's been getting so good, and LTE data so fast, that we just assume that the latest handsets are going to milk the wireless spectrum for all it's worth.
The iPhone 7 doesn't let us down there, and this year Apple even manages to deliver (what has the potential to be) a respectable upgrade, increasing the phone's theoretical maximum LTE Advanced bandwidth from 300 to 450 megabits per second.
Will you actually see those kinds of speeds? Well, between the need for carriers to build out their networks to support such throughput, to say nothing of the myriad other users all fighting with you for access to that bandwidth, we wouldn't suggest holding your breath. Ultimately, though, it really matters little: the iPhone 7 pulls down some nice, fast data, and the capacity for it to do so even faster is just the icing on the cake.
More content with (iPhone 7)
FEATURED VIDEO
257 Comments
1. schinnak
Posts: 116; Member since: Oct 26, 2011
"Beautiful design skilfully hides antenna lines" - wth did I just read??
posted on Sep 22, 2016, 4:51 AM 71
12. Finalflash
Posts: 4052; Member since: Jul 23, 2013
These are the points given to the phone:
Incredible battery life (BS because PA test has been rigged to iPhone ever since they changed the script)
Beautiful design skilfully hides antenna lines (WTF?)
Bright, bold, colorful display (Same as last year and far below industry standard)
Stereo sound is a welcome addition (Even though it's unbalanced unlike competition)
Lightning EarPods sound as good as ever (WHAT? They suck, universally agreed to by everyone and how is this better than last time?)
Fantastic showcase for iOS 10's new features (What would that be? Widgets?)
A10 Fusion delivers on performance (Yes)
Camera with great low-light performance and OIS (The camera is the same as last year with overexposed night shots still not on par with a 6P even)
Additionally:
Same design as last year
No headphone jack
How this thing scored above an S7 is beyond me.
posted on Sep 22, 2016, 5:00 AM 63
24. xdza1979
Posts: 296; Member since: Aug 08, 2015
"Instead of fancy curved screens or crazy resolution, Apple focuses on performance: brightness and color"
It's amazing how +they change negative outdated specs into something positive and manage to label other creative far better specs as negatives and gimmicks...!
posted on Sep 22, 2016, 5:20 AM 33
184. jphillips63
Posts: 253; Member since: Jan 04, 2012
Those outdated hardware still blows all the so called breaking edge hardware out of the water in benchmark tests. So please go cry to your favorite supplier as to why can't they beat a phone with so called outdated specs.
posted on Sep 22, 2016, 2:21 PM 2
225. marorun
Posts: 5029; Member since: Mar 30, 2015
jphillips63 did you read is reply?
*A10 Fusion delivers on performance (Yes)*
So he agreed and we all do thats the A10 fusion deliver performance wise.
He was speaking about other points.
So troll harder okay?
posted on Sep 23, 2016, 11:00 AM 0
255. sgodsell
Posts: 6592; Member since: Mar 16, 2013
If the iPhone 7 is so crazy fast, then why is the iPhone 7 still using such a low resolution display? I can buy a $100 Android phone that has a full HD display. So what's Apples excuse? Is it so Apple can boast and brag about some crazy benchmarks with one of the lowest resolution displays in today's market. All while Apple can still charge their crazy overpriced rates for low end specs. Apple really has deep pockets and can make others lie for them.
posted on Sep 28, 2016, 10:37 AM 0
45. Nathan_ingx
Posts: 4764; Member since: Mar 07, 2012
Spare time and head over to the first user review given.
Seems iPhone 7 is the brightest phone ever!
posted on Sep 22, 2016, 6:22 AM 0
78. trojan_horse
Posts: 5868; Member since: May 06, 2016
I too can acknowledge that the iPhone 7 is excellent when it comes to raw power and responsive speed. But other than that, it's a meh and no where near deserve that score.
posted on Sep 22, 2016, 7:47 AM 6
201. karan1402d
Posts: 87; Member since: May 28, 2015
Even the performance is good in all departments other CPU and Internal storage. The GPU in iPhone 7 is lackluster and is equal to one year old model iPhone 6s, anyway it will be thrashed by the Snapdragon 820. Seems Apple gave too much die space to CPU and cutting on the GPU which is a bad precedent. Camera is groundbreaking but similar what other flagships provide now. iPhone 7/7 Plus is dismal at best
posted on Sep 22, 2016, 4:35 PM 1
143. xondk
Posts: 1904; Member since: Mar 25, 2014
Yeah the whole 'stereo' sound seems to be something many seem to be interested in...apparently?
Yet how on so small devices, will it really make a difference? and wouldn't simply using headset be better?
posted on Sep 22, 2016, 10:49 AM 1
145. TechieXP1969
Posts: 14967; Member since: Sep 25, 2013
"How this thing scored above an S7 is beyond me."
We do know. It's iPhonearena. But nothign to question or debate.
Someone posted last week I beleiev that they expected PA would give the iPhone 7 a 9.x rating and they would make sure it was above the S7/Note7.
I knew he was right.
Even though the iPhone has 1/2 the hardware prowness of the Galaxy S which is its direct rival, it is hard to judge battery life and here is why.
Suppose we could swap the firmware on the phone. Now that the iPhone has a quad chip, how would it do running the S7's firmware and how would the Galaxy fair running iOS 10?
I am not talking having the identical hardware featues. Just saying havign the iPhoen 7 run the S7's firmware with all its capabilities whether they work or not.
On a 1900Mah battery, how long would an iPhone last. Since iOS is slimmer vs android, on a Galaxy S7, I would expect that the S7 would last nearly a week on a single charge based on its battery size.
And since an iphone barely last an 8 hour work day, if it had the S7's firmware, it would probably last 1/2 that long.
According to this guys video. He played a video at 720p which is the max allowed by the iPhone 7. The phone lasted only 4 hours
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VbAposncKv8
At the end, his list shows the S7 Edge lasted 8 hours. I expected it to be double, because the battery is nearly double the size.
Think I'm pretty burned out on PA's bias.
posted on Sep 22, 2016, 10:51 AM 6
168. mrochester
Posts: 926; Member since: Aug 17, 2014
But the iPhone has twice the S7's software prowess. It's not just all about hardware specs, it's the software too and the overall user experience. That's why the iPhone has consistently scored so highly.
posted on Sep 22, 2016, 12:36 PM 2
229. marorun
Posts: 5029; Member since: Mar 30, 2015
mrochester iPhone software is a joke its super unstable and every update bring load of issue to be fixed and broken again with 20 others upgrade.
Back before ios 7 ios was super stable but now its a mess i am sorry but its reality.
Its becoming closer and closer to android ( and at some level android getting closer to ios too ) just those new way of using lockscreen is proof.
Sorry but only valid reason iPhone scoore so highly is called bias nothing more.
Still if tomorow they made an iPhone like the 7 with a 3000 mah or more battery and android i would buy it.
like the design and its has a hell of a good soc.
posted on Sep 23, 2016, 11:09 AM 0
228. marorun
Posts: 5029; Member since: Mar 30, 2015
Yeah looped video is a great test.
on my lg g5 i can do 5-6 hours looped 720p video.
but on my older moto x play i could easily do 10 hours or more.
when you look at the review is battery usage is mostly safari lol thats dont take as much battery as gaming or video ect.
posted on Sep 23, 2016, 11:07 AM 0
44. Jimrod
Posts: 1602; Member since: Sep 22, 2014
Well can you easily see the antenna lines on the black iPhone 7? No? Then they're well hidden.
It's a simple enough concept to grasp but as usual just waffle anything anti-Apple for the green thumb brigade...
posted on Sep 22, 2016, 6:20 AM 2
54. nebula
Posts: 1009; Member since: Feb 20, 2015
I dont know what is more mysterious and fascinating the fact its hidden or the fact its simply not there. One thing i dont get how can that be praised in any way beyond blue moon Beyong any rational comprehension and common sense. That ia simply fanatical.
posted on Sep 22, 2016, 6:39 AM 3
59. Jimrod
Posts: 1602; Member since: Sep 22, 2014
Oh I'm not arguing about the design, just that people seem to think the antenna bands aren't well hidden (at least on the black models). The design is old and stale, but then looking at all the other phones coming out it seems most are sadly.
posted on Sep 22, 2016, 6:46 AM 0
79. trojan_horse
Posts: 5868; Member since: May 06, 2016
My wonder is this: how can the "well-hidden" antenna lines be considered a "pro" in rating?
Has antenna lines ever been considered a "con" when the iPhone 6 and 6s were reviewed? Was it unskillful? As it's apparently now a skillful design work on the iPhone 7!
posted on Sep 22, 2016, 7:53 AM 11
150. TechieXP1969
Posts: 14967; Member since: Sep 25, 2013
No one is being anti-Apple. We want PA to grade the phone on s'**t that matters and has substance and not BS garbage that doesn't even matter.
Here is why that antenna line BS is just that. First off, the phone comes in more colors than black. The lines aren't hidden on the other models, so the fact is it isn't hidden at all. There are 3 light color options vs 2 darker color options. So the lighter colors outweigh the 2 darker ones.
So antenna lines have sunstance?
Ok so tjhe fact several phones, not just the Galaxy have he smallest antenna lines in the industry, why didn't those phones get an extra point for it? In fact, when you look at any phone with smaller antenna lines, the lines weren't even mentioned in the review.
What is suppose to matter is simple.
PA should have a list that is consistent with ALL phones, and not be garded for things that are unique to one phone and not available on another.
For example, I would not give the Note 7 any poinst becaus eit has an iris Scanner, because theer isn't a fair amount of devices on the market to make a reasonable and fair comparison.
I wouldn't give the iPhoen points for Force Touch, because gain theer ian't a fair amoutn of phones on the market using the tech.
It makes the gading unfair.
The phoen should be reviews based on the most consistent options that are more synonymist with more phones.
So CPU, GPU, RAM, Display, brightness, design and similar are things that are a least common denominator for all phones.
When you put in in that perspective, the iPhone 7 is nearly 100% identical to the previous model. So how is it scoring so high, when other phones have been given lower score when they do the same thing and barely make any changes?
No one dislike the iPhone. We did like the BS and lies being told and how the reviews show to much bias. They aren't giving the readers useful or even truthful information.
We have seen PA outright cheat on camera tests. we have seen them outright cheat and lie on battery tests.
The only way the iPhone for example, can beat a Galaxy S in a battery test is if Samsung didn't optimize the device with all its features. However with the exception of PA, the battery tests on an S have always been significantly better since the S5 above the iPhone. The only place where the testing has said otherwise is on PA.
Example, the iPhone 6S Plus in PA's rundown test was 100% identical to the Note 5. Yet this was not the case on any other website.
if you can't be fair, when why even waste time with a review?
when cars are reviewed, advanced capabilities and features are mentioned, but they are never graded because it would be 100% unfair to compare and grade if the said feature is not an industry standard.
Antenna lines are not industry standard. They only on phones made of metal. Seeing as the Galaxy lines take you facing the phone and looking at top or bottom, if this is to be graded then why wants it for them? BIAS!
posted on Sep 22, 2016, 11:18 AM 4
84. androidwindows
Posts: 216; Member since: Oct 04, 2014
I'll just write my comment here...Nobody wants to comment on the poor camera performance????
posted on Sep 22, 2016, 8:13 AM 5
* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.
Report Post
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):
- Display 4.7" 750 x 1334 pixels
- Camera 12 MP / 7 MP front
- Processor Apple A10 Fusion, Quad-core, 2340 MHz
- Memory
- Storage 256 GB
- Battery 1960 mAh(14h 3G talk time)
Recent articles


