x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options

Apple iPhone 4S vs Motorola DROID BIONIC vs Samsung Galaxy S II T-Mobile

0. phoneArena posted on 27 Oct 2011, 09:44

All launched relatively close to one another, the Motorola DROID BIONIC, Samsung Galaxy S II for T-Mobile, and Apple iPhone 4S are all vying for supremacy in being proclaimed as the best of the best. We’ve all waited long enough this year to finally see these quality smartphones, so which one will ultimately outgun the rest in finding itself home in your hands?...

This is a discussion for a review. To read the whole review, click here

posted on 27 Oct 2011, 12:00 1

28. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)

What? Your post makes no sense at all. You mad bro? iPhone blows the socks of any android when it comes to stability and smooth performance.

posted on 27 Oct 2011, 12:34 1

42. Johnny_Mnemonic (Posts: 240; Member since: 05 Oct 2011)

Taco read this ( the iPhone 4S, it isn’t necessarily classified as a next-generation iPhone, since it’s nothing more than an incremental upgrade. ) and you call it the next gen phone PLEASEE

posted on 27 Oct 2011, 22:34

87. rayjones09 (Posts: 149; Member since: 16 Dec 2010)

He's actually right. Android isn't known for stability.

posted on 28 Oct 2011, 15:30

104. remixfa (Posts: 14605; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)

he's actually wrong

android is very stable now. it didnt USED to be known for stability but that went out the window with 2.2/2.3

posted on 27 Oct 2011, 12:01

29. DROIDX0430 (Posts: 469; Member since: 24 Nov 2010)

The Bionic isn't inferior to the RAZR....Brother and Sister as far as I'm concerned...Both are good devices and will serve each individual owner to their desired needs....(thinnest) goes to the RAZR and a .2 faster processor is the only difference in hardware...so inferior I don't think so.....They both are LTE, they both are Motorola, they both are part of the Droid series, they both pack 1gb of RAM---one has a removable battery, the RAZR does not, they both have Gorilla Glass...It will boil down to presentation, style and looks--not hardware specs--to make one phone inferior to the other-- and yes the RAZR does look better....

posted on 27 Oct 2011, 12:29

38. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)

Oh so now specs don't matter? They only matter for the iPhone?

posted on 27 Oct 2011, 12:09 1

32. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5713; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)

Miz is King of having more thumbs down on a single post. xD

posted on 27 Oct 2011, 12:18 3

34. bolaG (Posts: 468; Member since: 15 Aug 2011)

Very fair recommendation. Bionic being future proof makes sense; it'll have ICS OTA, it has LTE, web dock, hdmi out, 1gb of ram, dual core, and upgradable battery. Razr is the same hardware, basically, the only differences are the screen, and construction.

posted on 27 Oct 2011, 12:37 1

44. robinrisk (unregistered)

THe review itself was slightly Apple biased, though he made up for it in the conclusions, so the review was ok.

However, what i find funny ise with that in order to get the iPhone 4S on the line with Android phones, they need to find the Stripped Down version of the world´s best phone and another phone that arrived too late into the market with an available successor as of right now.

In order to compete in specs and performance, the iPhone can not compete with top of the line android phones anymore. :)

posted on 27 Oct 2011, 13:49

55. jsnruthlis (Posts: 2; Member since: 30 Sep 2011)

no kiddin the worst version of gs2 and motos disappointment? ...ridiculous.

posted on 27 Oct 2011, 12:40

45. Mr.Mr.Upgrade (Posts: 474; Member since: 30 Aug 2011)

Wow, a reviewer who actually knows what they are talking about, the whole point of buying technology is to stay up to date, why sign for a two year contract, without 4g ltethe clear winner here is also Verizon, they been the driving force

posted on 27 Oct 2011, 13:10 2

48. taz89 (Posts: 2014; Member since: 03 May 2011)

so they pick the worst of the gs2, at least pick one of the exynos versions

posted on 27 Oct 2011, 13:25

52. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5713; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)

xD i rest my case.

posted on 27 Oct 2011, 14:07

57. InspectorGadget80 (unregistered)

I choose the SII as the winner

posted on 27 Oct 2011, 14:09

59. InspectorGadget80 (unregistered)

Scratch my last comment I meant to say the DROID Bionic then the SII

posted on 27 Oct 2011, 15:02 3

67. GalaxySIIguy (Posts: 6; Member since: 05 Oct 2011)

Every article I read on this site proclaims the iPhone 4S is the best. It's seriously as if your site and every other site out there sit around and worship this phone. I realize that it is a fantastic device but is not NEARLY as wonderful as you make it out to be. With Android phones you nit-pick EVERY SINGLE detail about it, tearing it down how it doesn't have this or doesn't have that, yet with the iPhone its AMAZING despite its still similar 3.5 in screen, its iOS that is lagging behind Android and playing catchup, incredibly fragile frame and body. It's disappointing how biased this and every site out there has become towards Apples golden child. I think (according to Phonearena) that no matter how far Android comes with LTE, huge vibrant screens, and super fast processors they will never match a phone that should have came out 6 months ago or better (iPhone 4S).


posted on 27 Oct 2011, 15:55 2

77. Ivan6479 (Posts: 250; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)

This is so very true. I mean the damn iPhone doesn't even come with turn by turn navigation like all the Androids do. :) I mean come on already Apple this is almost 2012 already so this is a must have in today's phones.

posted on 27 Oct 2011, 21:32

82. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)

only android has built in turn by turn. iPhone has lots of navigation apps so it's not like it doesn't have that functionality.

posted on 29 Oct 2011, 13:40 2

115. Ivan6479 (Posts: 250; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)

You said it you have to go download some app, and if you want a decent one you have to pay for it unlike android where it comes pre-installed when you purchase your device just as it should be.

posted on 27 Oct 2011, 21:31 3

81. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)

They recommended the the Bionic. Did you read the article?

posted on 27 Oct 2011, 22:35

88. rayjones09 (Posts: 149; Member since: 16 Dec 2010)

Lol, I know right.

posted on 29 Oct 2011, 13:44 2

116. Ivan6479 (Posts: 250; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)

Yes I read the article iTard, did you read my post? I never mentioned that he chose the iPhone as the winner here I was simply referring to his camera comparison between the iPhone and the Galaxy S2. You are such an iTard!

posted on 27 Oct 2011, 15:15

69. Carlitos (Posts: 557; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)

the iphone 4s is not the best out there, or the worst, but it isnt to much of an upgrade from the iphone 4. Now tht you can have siri in the iphone 4 there is no need for the 4s. This battle shouldnt have been with this two android phones, it should have been with early year androids. The heck my Atrix which i have from february, can run the iphone 4s. I do give the last two iphones to be very smoth, but thats because it doesnt run much in the background and it only has an app launcher.

posted on 28 Oct 2011, 09:07

91. mclifford81 (Posts: 76; Member since: 26 Jan 2010)

I probably coult disagree with this article more. I went from the Thunderbolt to the Iphone 4 to the thunderbolt back to the iphone 4 and to the Bionic and I had probably more problems with the Bionic than any phone I have ever owned and I have had many phones in my day, smart phones and dumb phones alike. Regardless the call quality was good when I actually got a signal and Richmond, Va. has LTE but it constantly would go from LTE to 3g and then I couldn't even get internet or send texts through my phone. That annoyance aside the constant reboots that I would receive daily made this phone go from bad to worse. The Thunderbolt seemed to have better performance and battery life than this phone and that was rid of bugs too. I reverted back to the Iphone 4 as even though it is not open sourced and doesn't have as much pizzazz as Android in my opinion, it just works and to me thats more beneficial that having a phone that you can surf and talk at the same time on or have data speeds higher than 3g, if it doesn't work then what good is all that.. If anyone wants to complain or has questions about any phone feel free to reply to me personally vbuggio at the google mail

posted on 28 Oct 2011, 14:05 1

96. ash29 (Posts: 58; Member since: 28 Oct 2011)

How did iphone 4s come in comparison to these two great phones???

posted on 01 Nov 2011, 11:59

122. Ivan6479 (Posts: 250; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)

LOL I know right!! I guess they didn't wanna piss off the iTards on this site by leaving them out all together. Those iTards will believe anything they read. You know how the saying goes the proof is in the pudding. If you let an iPhone user use an Android for a month I seriously doubt they would be in any hurry to get back to their miniscule 3.5" screen any time soon, but they are just too damn prideful to admit it. LOL iTards

posted on 01 Nov 2011, 12:15

124. bucky (Posts: 3135; Member since: 30 Sep 2009)

Funny, I have the sgs2 international version and im looking for a good deal on the iphone 4s. Stop being so insecure about the iphone. Android had a ways to go.

posted on 28 Oct 2011, 14:13

97. henrickrw (Posts: 408; Member since: 16 Sep 2011)

Grab an international version of the GS2 & you´re good to go

posted on 29 Oct 2011, 14:18

118. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5713; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)

did you guys by any chance watch the video comparison? i only just now watched it and i didn't realize they'd actually prefer the Motorola Application's Platform over TW4. even i would've been torn there. i like the Application's Platform quite well but if it was one of the Exynos versions of the Galaxy S II i'm sure the TW4 experience would've won.

posted on 01 Nov 2011, 12:07

123. Ivan6479 (Posts: 250; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)

My thoughts exactly!! Poor John V. has his head in the clouds unfortunately, so these are the piss poor results we get here at PA.

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories