x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 Xiaomi Mi MIX 2


  • Lots of RAM (6 GB RAM)

Xiaomi Mi MIX Xiaomi Mi MIX


  • High-resolution camera (16 megapixels)
  • Big battery (4400 mAh)
  • Low pixel density screen (361 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • High screen-to-body ratio (80.81 % vs 84.16 %)

in-depth comparison



OnePlus 5T OnePlus 5T


  • High-resolution camera (16 megapixels)
  • Low pixel density screen (400 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • High screen-to-body ratio (80.81 % vs 80.43 %)
  • Lots of RAM (6 GB RAM vs 8 GB RAM)

in-depth comparison



Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 Xiaomi Mi MIX 2


  • High screen-to-body ratio (80.81 %)

Xiaomi Mi 6 Xiaomi Mi 6


  • Optical camera zoom

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lots of RAM (6 GB RAM)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Galaxy Note 8 Samsung Galaxy Note 8


  • Optical camera zoom
  • Supports wireless charging
  • Extremely high pixel density screen (522 ppi)
  • Large camera sensor pixel size (1.4 μm)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • High screen-to-body ratio (80.81 % vs 82.98 %)
  • Lots of RAM (6 GB RAM)

in-depth comparison



Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 Xiaomi Mi MIX 2


  • Lots of RAM (6 GB RAM)

Apple iPhone X Apple iPhone X


  • Optical camera zoom
  • Supports wireless charging
  • Proprietary USB connector

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • High screen-to-body ratio (80.81 % vs 82.35 %)

in-depth comparison



Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 Xiaomi Mi MIX 2


  • Lots of RAM (6 GB RAM)

LG V30 LG V30


  • Supports wireless charging
  • Extremely high pixel density screen (537 ppi)
  • High-resolution camera (16 megapixels)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • High screen-to-body ratio (80.81 % vs 81.21 %)

in-depth comparison



Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 Xiaomi Mi MIX 2


  • Lots of RAM (6 GB RAM)

Samsung Galaxy S8 Samsung Galaxy S8


  • Supports wireless charging
  • Extremely high pixel density screen (570 ppi)
  • Large camera sensor pixel size (1.4 μm)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • High screen-to-body ratio (80.81 % vs 84.26 %)

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories