Nokia 3.2 Rivals

Click on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia 3.2 vs. Nokia 4.2

Nokia 3.2 Nokia 3.2

  • Big battery (4000 mAh)
VS.

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • High screen-to-body ratio (80.47 % vs 76.6 %)
  • Low pixel density screen (269 ppi)

Nokia 3.2 vs. Nokia 3.1

Nokia 3.2 Nokia 3.2

  • High screen-to-body ratio (80.47 %)
  • Big battery (4000 mAh)
VS.

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (269 ppi)

Nokia 3.2 vs. Nokia 3.1 Plus

Nokia 3.2 Nokia 3.2

  • High screen-to-body ratio (80.47 %)
  • Big battery (4000 mAh)
VS.

Nokia 3.1 Plus Nokia 3.1 Plus

  • Too little RAM

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (269 ppi)

Nokia 3.2 vs. Nokia 5.1 Plus

Nokia 3.2 Nokia 3.2

  • Big battery (4000 mAh)
VS.

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • High screen-to-body ratio (80.47 % vs 78.08 %)
  • Low pixel density screen (269 ppi)

Nokia 3.2 vs. Nokia 7.1

Nokia 3.2 Nokia 3.2

  • Big battery (4000 mAh)
  • Low pixel density screen (269 ppi)
VS.

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • High screen-to-body ratio (80.47 % vs 79.68 %)

Nokia 3.2 vs. Samsung Galaxy A10

Nokia 3.2 Nokia 3.2

  • Big battery (4000 mAh)
VS.

Samsung Galaxy A10 Samsung Galaxy A10

  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • Too little RAM

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • High screen-to-body ratio (80.47 % vs 80.07 %)
  • Low pixel density screen (269 ppi)

Nokia 3.2 vs. Samsung Galaxy A50

Nokia 3.2 Nokia 3.2

  • Low pixel density screen (269 ppi)
VS.

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • High screen-to-body ratio (80.47 % vs 85.24 %)
  • Big battery (4000 mAh)
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.