x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

HP iPAQ Glisten Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

HP iPAQ Glisten HP iPAQ Glisten


  • The camera lacks flash

HP iPAQ hw6900 HP iPAQ hw6900


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Thick body (0.71 inches inches)
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Hardware QWERTY keyboard
  • The touchscreen uses resistive technology, which is not responsive
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera
  • Too little RAM memory (0.25 GB RAM vs 0.06 GB RAM)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low pixel density screen (160 ppi vs 113 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



HP iPAQ Glisten HP iPAQ Glisten


  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low pixel density screen (160 ppi)

HP iPAQ hw6500 HP iPAQ hw6500


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Thick body (0.71 inches inches)
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Hardware QWERTY keyboard
  • The touchscreen uses resistive technology, which is not responsive
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera
  • Too little RAM memory (0.25 GB RAM vs 0.06 GB RAM)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



HP iPAQ Glisten HP iPAQ Glisten


  • The camera lacks autofocus

LG Fathom LG Fathom


  • Thick body (0.65 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Hardware QWERTY keyboard
  • The touchscreen uses resistive technology, which is not responsive
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera
  • Too little RAM memory (0.25 GB RAM)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low pixel density screen (160 ppi vs 292 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



HP iPAQ Glisten HP iPAQ Glisten


  • Hardware QWERTY keyboard
  • The touchscreen uses resistive technology, which is not responsive
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)

HP Slate 6 VoiceTab II HP Slate 6 VoiceTab II


  • Lightweight phone
  • Dual SIM card support

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Too little RAM memory (0.25 GB RAM vs 1 GB RAM)
  • Low pixel density screen (160 ppi vs 245 ppi)

in-depth comparison



HP iPAQ Glisten HP iPAQ Glisten


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

HP iPAQ 900 HP iPAQ 900


  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Hardware QWERTY keyboard
  • The touchscreen uses resistive technology, which is not responsive
  • No front-facing camera
  • Too little RAM memory (0.25 GB RAM vs 0.1 GB RAM)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low pixel density screen (160 ppi vs 163 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



HP iPAQ Glisten HP iPAQ Glisten


  • Hardware QWERTY keyboard
  • The touchscreen uses resistive technology, which is not responsive
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Single-core processor

HP iPAQ Voice Messenger HP iPAQ Voice Messenger


  • Does not support automatic screen brightness

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • No front-facing camera
  • Too little RAM memory (0.25 GB RAM vs 0.1 GB RAM)
  • Low pixel density screen (160 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



HP iPAQ Glisten HP iPAQ Glisten


  • The touchscreen uses resistive technology, which is not responsive
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Single-core processor

HP iPAQ Data Messenger HP iPAQ Data Messenger


  • Thick body (0.69 inches inches)
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Hardware QWERTY keyboard
  • No front-facing camera
  • Too little RAM memory (0.25 GB RAM vs 0.1 GB RAM)
  • Low pixel density screen (160 ppi vs 142 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories