Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Google Pixel 3 XL Google Pixel 3 XL


  • Extremely high pixel density screen (522 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • High screen-to-body ratio (75.93 % vs 83.12 %)
  • Supports wireless charging
  • Large camera sensor pixel size (1.4 μm)

in-depth comparison



Google Pixel 3 Google Pixel 3


  • High screen-to-body ratio (75.93 %)
  • Supports wireless charging

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Large camera sensor pixel size (1.4 μm)

in-depth comparison



Apple iPhone XS Apple iPhone XS


  • Optical camera zoom
  • Proprietary USB connector

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • High screen-to-body ratio (75.93 % vs 82.64 %)
  • Supports wireless charging
  • Large camera sensor pixel size (1.4 μm)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Galaxy S9


  • Extremely high pixel density screen (568 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • High screen-to-body ratio (75.93 % vs 84.36 %)
  • Supports wireless charging
  • Large camera sensor pixel size (1.4 μm)

in-depth comparison



Google Pixel 3 Google Pixel 3


  • Supports wireless charging

Google Pixel 2 XL Google Pixel 2 XL


  • Extremely high pixel density screen (537 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • High screen-to-body ratio (75.93 % vs 76.66 %)
  • Large camera sensor pixel size (1.4 μm)

in-depth comparison



Google Pixel 3 Google Pixel 3


  • High screen-to-body ratio (75.93 %)
  • Supports wireless charging

Google Pixel XL Google Pixel XL


  • Extremely high pixel density screen (534 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Large camera sensor pixel size (1.4 μm vs 1.55 μm)

in-depth comparison



Google Pixel 3 Google Pixel 3


  • High screen-to-body ratio (75.93 %)
  • Supports wireless charging

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Large camera sensor pixel size (1.4 μm vs 1.55 μm)

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories