Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Apple iPhone 8 Apple iPhone 8


  • Small dimensions (5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (326 ppi)

Apple iPhone X Apple iPhone X


  • High screen-to-body ratio (82.35 %)
  • Optical camera zoom

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Supports wireless charging
  • Proprietary USB connector

in-depth comparison



Apple iPhone 8 Apple iPhone 8


  • Supports wireless charging

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches vs 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches)
  • Proprietary USB connector
  • Low pixel density screen (326 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Apple iPhone 8 Apple iPhone 8


  • Small dimensions (5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (326 ppi)

Apple iPhone 8 Plus Apple iPhone 8 Plus


  • Optical camera zoom

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Supports wireless charging
  • Proprietary USB connector

in-depth comparison



Apple iPhone 8 Apple iPhone 8


  • Small dimensions (5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches)
  • Proprietary USB connector
  • Low pixel density screen (326 ppi)

Samsung Galaxy S8 Samsung Galaxy S8


  • High screen-to-body ratio (84.26 %)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen (570 ppi)
  • Large camera sensor pixel size (1.4 μm)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Supports wireless charging

in-depth comparison



Apple iPhone 8 Apple iPhone 8


  • Supports wireless charging

Apple iPhone 6 Apple iPhone 6


  • Large camera sensor pixel size (1.5 μm)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches vs 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.27 inches)
  • Proprietary USB connector
  • Low pixel density screen (326 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Apple iPhone 8 Apple iPhone 8


  • Supports wireless charging

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches vs 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches)
  • Proprietary USB connector
  • Low pixel density screen (326 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Apple iPhone 8 Apple iPhone 8


  • Small dimensions (5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches)
  • Proprietary USB connector
  • Low pixel density screen (326 ppi)

Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Galaxy S9


  • High screen-to-body ratio (84.36 %)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen (568 ppi)
  • Large camera sensor pixel size (1.4 μm)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Supports wireless charging

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories