Verizon support pages confirms HTC DROID DNA name before it's announced

Verizon support pages confirms HTC DROID DNA name before it's announced
We’ve been seeing quite a lot about the monster 1080p phablet that HTC is set to unleash on Verizon customers (and possibly Google Play customers with a Nexus variant). We’ve seen several suggested names, including a recent Minimum Advertised Price (MAP) announcement that referred to the device as the HTC DROID DNA. MAP announcements aren’t always final (and are often circulated by third party resellers), but now Verizon’s own customer service pages have outed the device. While that’s not an official announcement, it seems pretty darn close given that Verizon is apparently entering the DROID DNA into its own computer systems.

You can check out a screen grab below, or check out the source link to see it yourself:

source: Verizon via Droid-Life



1. OptimusOne

Posts: 694; Member since: May 22, 2012

this crushes all verizon phones(maybe with the exception of the galaxy s III)

2. ajac09

Posts: 1482; Member since: Sep 30, 2009

Sorry but Id still take a note 2 over it maybe not 1080p screen but everything else is as good or better. 1080p screen vs 5.5 in screen Ill take the larger screen.

4. Max_Boost

Posts: 101; Member since: Sep 22, 2012

I'll take the Note II also over the HTC for its removable battery. (Besides the larger screen.)

15. androiddownsouth

Posts: 598; Member since: May 02, 2012

Not a fan of a non-removeable battery, but the DNA will get the nod from me personally. Both phones will kick a** though, especially compared to "the phone that must not be named" lol.

3. Droid_X_Doug

Posts: 5993; Member since: Dec 22, 2010

And the Note II.

6. OptimusOne

Posts: 694; Member since: May 22, 2012

ohhh forget the note II

9. skymitch89

Posts: 1453; Member since: Nov 05, 2010

Forget you.

26. OptimusOne

Posts: 694; Member since: May 22, 2012

another reason why i wouldn't get the note II: the verizon logo on the home button. it looks absolutly hideous. thats a dealbreaker

28. androiddownsouth

Posts: 598; Member since: May 02, 2012

I love Verizon, but they are so wrong for that lol. That is hideous.

41. Max_Boost

Posts: 101; Member since: Sep 22, 2012

I know how to get rid of the logo, but I'm not telling you. LOL (Found it on another site on how to do it.) :D

30. KingKurogiii

Posts: 5713; Member since: Oct 23, 2011

or the MAXX HD. :P

5. Birds

Posts: 1172; Member since: Nov 21, 2011

I love and hate the name...mostly love but something about the word DNA makes me feel like I reverted back to my primordial ways and acted like an Australopithecus in a world without....*GASP*...cellphones....But then again, I'm simply drama queening and I am in love with this name. I also hope that the Droid DNA is what HTC needs to put itself back on top.

7. androiddownsouth

Posts: 598; Member since: May 02, 2012

More power to you guys that want the Note II, but I'll take the DNA over the Note II. I can barely talk myself into the 5" screen, much less a 5.5" screen. Just not my taste. That, and I love my Rezound, and look forward to seeing HTC return to the top tier of phones with this one. I honestly don't think you could go wrong with this or the Note II. Both will kick some serious a**.=)

8. kpfirefighter

Posts: 160; Member since: Sep 20, 2011

Which phone will have the faster processor though? In my experience the HTC phones have always been faster than the rest of them. So do you think the HTC will be faster than the note 2

14. androiddownsouth

Posts: 598; Member since: May 02, 2012

The difference in speed is likely to be so small you won't really be able to tell. Both should be quad core and 2GB of RAM with LTE, so more than anything the speed will probably depend on the strength of the LTE signal where you happen to be at that time.

18. ben7337

Posts: 6; Member since: Oct 31, 2012

Both phones have quad cores running at 1.5ghz and 1.6ghz respectively. However the 1.5ghz qualcomm in the htc has the Krait architecture, so it should be more powerful than the higher clock speed samsung. Also the adreno 320 in the qualcomm chip is more powerful than the galaxy note II's gpu from what I've seen in glbenchmark tests at least. So overall I'd say the HTC will be more powerful. Plus it should be usable one handed. The only downside to the HTC is the non-removable lower capacity battery, and possible LCD, if you prefer amoled screens. Overall I'd say the HTC wins for anyone who doesn't want a giant phone, and should be pretty good assuming it has a microsd card slot.

10. alouden unregistered

It it has a 5-inch screen. Anda ridiculous 441 ppi. So I will love the screen, no doubt. But I need to see some other specs. Details are lacking.

11. jphillips63

Posts: 253; Member since: Jan 04, 2012

Also HTC radios are far superior over anything Samsung has released. Hardware is no good if it lacks the main piece a good radio. Samsung does well in areas where the towers are nearby but once you leave those areas this is where they fall off, actually this is where Samsung falls on there face. So its all HTC for me.

12. zackh121556

Posts: 133; Member since: Feb 01, 2012

Note 2 all the way

13. androiddownsouth

Posts: 598; Member since: May 02, 2012

I think these two devices are going to be so close in specs that there will be little difference in processor speed and both should sport 2GB of RAM. I'm not a fan of a battery I cannot remove, but that said, I've watched the RAZR series do quite well for Motorola and none of those have removeable batteries. Also, there are some good external battery options out there like the smartseries battery packs that can help with juice away from a power outlet. I've just really liked my phones I've had by HTC, so I'll stick with them personally. The Note II is just a lil too big for me, and I think the rest of the specs will be very very close, especially if previous articles here on phonearena are correct.

16. oldghost

Posts: 8; Member since: Oct 30, 2012

If this phone has a decently sized battery AND a SD CARD the HTC DNA will be my next phone. Sorry, Mr. Duarte, SD cards do not confuse me.

17. androiddownsouth

Posts: 598; Member since: May 02, 2012

Nor I lol. As long as the battery is 2500 mah or better with an SD card slot, the DNA shall be mine.=)

20. alouden unregistered

And likely mine as well...SD cards confusing...uh yeah. Real difficult to grasp external memory...

19. ben7337

Posts: 6; Member since: Oct 31, 2012

I think this phone will rock. The Note II is just too big I think. This phone is right on the limit in size for me, and bigger is better, so that is a plus. The only competition I see for it is the GSIII and Razr HD line. However the GSIII has 1/2 the cpu and gpu power, and weaker cell reception. The Razr HD Maxx is $100 more just to get better battery life, but still only 1/2 the cpu, and gpu speed and 1/2 the ram. At the $200 price point, the Razr HD matches this phone on the rumored 2500mah battery, but this phone has a bigger higher resolution screen that should use way less power, not to mention all the extra power and ram. So long as the DNA has a micro sd card slot like the razr HD, I think it easily holds more value for the dollar.

21. androiddownsouth

Posts: 598; Member since: May 02, 2012

You broke it down right there ben. 2500mah battery and a microSD card slot, and this phone should be the powerhouse phone for at least a couple months for anyone not wanting to go as high as the Note II. The Note II will be bada**, but it's just too big for my taste. The 5" is right on the limit for size for me as well.

22. VirtueParadoxx

Posts: 7; Member since: Oct 31, 2012

Yeah, no the Maxx HD is $200 with a 2 year contract through Amazon Wireless

35. ben7337

Posts: 6; Member since: Oct 31, 2012

Shame a lot of the people buying these power phones have unlimited data though, and need to use the upgrade of another line just to get the smartphones at any discount, and guess what? Transferring a phone bought from to another line will get you a huge fee for not keeping it on there for 6 months. I focus on verizon's prices for the phone because it is where a majority of people buy them in the first place, and is one of the few options for those of us with unlimited data using another line's upgrade. You are right that there are some people who will look on amazon and see the maxx hd for $200, but they will also see the razr hd at $150, and who's to say the DNA won't be $150 or even $100 on amazon when it comes out? To deal searchers, the DNA might still end up as the best price for performance, especially if it doesn't sell too well and needs a lower price to push it on 3rd parties.

42. KingKurogiii

Posts: 5713; Member since: Oct 23, 2011

i got the MAXX HD and kept my unlimited data, no problem. i'm not a big fan of Sense and i'm not real interested in having a Phablet. at this point i want a phone with enduring battery life. i can get a Nexus 10 to satisfy my power needs.

43. androiddownsouth

Posts: 598; Member since: May 02, 2012

I almost went the MAXX HD route, but I can't stop thinking about the quad core and 1080p goodness. That, and I've had good experiences with my HTC phones so I'll stick with them. Can't go wrong with the MAXX HD though. Very solid phone.

45. KingKurogiii

Posts: 5713; Member since: Oct 23, 2011

yeah, you're making the right choice for yourself for sure then. it's got to be announced early this month. Verizon & HTC will not miss the Holiday window for this thing and people start buying around this time. we could be hearing about an HTC & Verizon event any day now.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.