The iPhone X is "the iPhone of the future". Cool. Here are 4 things that would've made it better
by Preslav Kateliev / Sep 12, 2017, 4:40 PM
The iPhone X is a beautiful device, for sure. But let's be fair here, after all the bezel-less phones we've seen this year, it's hardly mind-blowing. So, it's up to the X to wow us with features that will leave the competition in the dust or at least ones that would make our jaws pop for a minute or two. That's not a hard ask for a $999 phone, is it?
All-around, it's a solid iPhone — the most advanced iPhone Apple has ever made, as the Cupertinians like to say. But we still have a few things on our wish list that really would've blown us away. Check them out in the gallery below! And do feel free to drop yours in the comments!
Posts: 1822; Member since: Apr 22, 2014
Apple still playing catch up... Might take a break from them this year... The X left me wanting more...
posted on Sep 12, 2017, 4:43 PM 12
Posts: 5868; Member since: May 06, 2016
Everyone has been playing catch up in the smartphone industry, bruh. Qualcomm and Samsung are playing catch up to Apple's A11 in the chipset department, no?
posted on Sep 12, 2017, 4:47 PM 4
A11 GPU seems like it'll comfortably beat the S835 GPU. We will have to see how good or bad the A11 GPU thermal throttles. But not even S845 will surpass the A11 in CPU performance. A75 cores(that is going in the S845 as next gen Kryo cores) are not gonna cut it for next year
posted on Sep 12, 2017, 4:57 PM 2
Posts: 1421; Member since: Sep 04, 2015
You do understand why the A11 has two ridiculously overpowered cores right? Their sole purpose is to load apps really fast, then offload them to the smaller cores. Why you ask? To compensate for iOS hibernates and caches apps once you switch to another. It was Apple's solution to one of iOS' shortcomings, it's something you still notice on older iPhone models, loadtimes when switching apps. Where Android opts to leave apps resident in RAM memory, for quicker accessibility, iOS hibernates and caches them and has to reload them each time, only a few apps are exempt from this in iOS. It meant that switching between apps frequently allowed Android users to more quickly return to using them than iOS users. Apple studies user data in depth and they know most people rarely use an app for longer than 2-3 mins at a time and switch between apps a lot, so to reduce those load times without fundamentally altering how iOS works, they had to come up with something that would work for them. That's why Apple has those two super cores, loading apps as fast as possible. They obviously will come with a serious drawback, a significantly higher power use than the small cores, probably 10 times higher. Odds are the smaller cores barely touch 1500 in Geekbench single core, that's why Apple opted to cluster 4 this time around, so they could offload even more demanding apps to those lesser cores once they've been loaded, for power efficiency reasons. I will agree with you that the Snapdragon 845 probably won't beat the A11. Reason behind that is Qualcomm probably doesn't really feel the heat from other SoC vendors for Android phones. The only ones that come close are Samsung's Exynos and Hisilicon's Kirin. The Snapdragon 835 was merely an 820 upgraded to an octacore design and slight improvements to other fields. It was by no means a new design and I'm not expecting the 845 to beat the A11 in single core performance either. Rumors have it though that it does top 2600 in Geekbench single core so it'll be a fair improvement over the 835, which hardly ever seems to beat 2000. If it's an octacore design again, with 4 cores topping 2600 and 4 smaller cores around 1500, it'll beat the A11 in multicore at least. It'll make for a plenty fast SoC, enough to rival it at least where it counts. The fundamental difference however remains that the Snapdragon 845 is meant to be widely accessible, whereas the A11 is solely for Apple's latest iPhones. Their aims are completely different, designed with completely different applications, the A11 is highly specialized solely for the iPhone, the Snapdragon 845 genericly for a wide variety of devices and platforms. For Qualcomm it simply wouldn't make sense to create such a highly specialized SoC, unless for one very specific client. They'll obviously go with what makes the most money, that's what they do.
posted on Sep 13, 2017, 2:56 AM 1
Posts: 1822; Member since: Apr 22, 2014
A11 is nice, I'll give it that much... But it doesn't have to do much, the A series is being upgraded every year for nothing. We can sit here are say Qual, and Sammy are playing catch up but in actuality they really aren't. I would love to see the a 835 with 6gb of ram in a iphone and a A11 in a Note 8... Lets see who comes out on top of that benchmark...
posted on Sep 12, 2017, 5:11 PM 2
Posts: 1697; Member since: Mar 04, 2009
2018 will the the year of the Fingerprints under glass Samsung s9 & LG G7 will will have it. So will Apple this time next year pity it was not ready for Apple this year.
posted on Sep 12, 2017, 4:45 PM 4
Posts: 552; Member since: Feb 25, 2017
Hifi, Hifi audio recording, Headphone jack
posted on Sep 12, 2017, 4:49 PM 5
Posts: 31072; Member since: Feb 05, 2011
Still quite a bit of bezel, and none of what I wanted in it. This is a nice device, and a definite pass. What a letdown. I can't believe it got a 5.8 inch screen, and no Pencil support at least.
posted on Sep 12, 2017, 4:54 PM 0
Posts: 144; Member since: Aug 12, 2011
No split-screen, no 3.5mm universal head-phone jack, no USB-C connector so that Apple can continue to milk money out of royalty on every lightning peripheral, no finger-print sensor as back-up to the face sensor, no dual-SIM neither, and true to the form of Apple, no uSD card slot so that Apple can make more profit by forcing customer to jump to the 256-GByte version, no ...
posted on Sep 13, 2017, 4:05 AM 0
Posts: 542; Member since: Oct 16, 2011
Headphone jack. Headphone jack. Headphone jack. Especially in this day and age when we see hackers focusing on bluetooth exploits, anyone slightly security conscious will want a secure headphone connection.
posted on Sep 12, 2017, 5:17 PM 1
Posts: 1824; Member since: Dec 08, 2014
We all know that manufacturer renders are misleading, but the actual bezel is like twice the size of the one in the render of the X. See at 6 seconds into this video for example:https://youtu.be/ZCQuasiJgYM?t
posted on Sep 12, 2017, 5:19 PM 0
Posts: 2588; Member since: Oct 31, 2011
Yes. The problem with it is the lack of colours. Not the ridiculous price, not the highlight of "animojis", not the fact that the face ID didn't work on stage, not the ridiculous notch on the top... The problem is a lack of colours...
posted on Sep 12, 2017, 5:34 PM 3
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):