Posts: 2; Member since: Jul 13, 2010
now and she's not even going to have to pay for that??
posted on Sep 28, 2010, 10:50 PM 0
Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008
bull. that is destruction of personal property and she should have to replace it. he shouldnt have taken the call, but she has no right to destroy personal property. take the phone away, send him to the dean.. do not break the device out of anger.
posted on Sep 29, 2010, 9:02 AM 0
bt she cud take tht childs phn away frm him thts nt way by smashing da phn on da ground!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
posted on Sep 28, 2010, 11:08 PM 0
Posts: 146; Member since: Oct 16, 2009
Rude? It's people like hmcougar and ras that further spread the disrespect that kids have these days. What was rude was the moron student talking on a cellphone in class. Which brings me to my next point. Apparently ras is also one of those students who would rather talk/text in class rather than learn how to spell properly. This is a forum, not a text message to your eleven year old bff. It makes you look stupid.
posted on Sep 28, 2010, 11:19 PM 0
Posts: 129; Member since: Mar 23, 2010
And how did this video get recorded????
posted on Sep 28, 2010, 11:32 PM 0
Posts: 71; Member since: Mar 12, 2010
Good thing she is not in the US. Otherwise she would probably be in jail being accused of child abuse and getting sued by the parents due to the mental anguish it caused their kid. He wasnt able to sleep for a week. Poor little kid, it was an emergency call. My 3rd grade teacher used to pull us by the hair if she caughts us talking while she was lecturing. Guess what happen after that?? we stopped.
posted on Sep 29, 2010, 2:18 AM 0
ad or not i wish this did happen. cell phones are not allowed in the class room, use at own risk. kids used to get hit and u pussies are bitching about her breaking a cell phone? should of broke it over the twerps head. turn it off or leave it in a locker. if you cant do that you dont deserve to have a cell phone.
posted on Sep 29, 2010, 10:02 AM 0
Posts: 5; Member since: Sep 29, 2010
The problem with this is that the parent probably owns the phone and the teacher just cost the parent $500-$600. She should have took the phone, gave the kid an "F" for the week and had the parent come in to get the phone.
posted on Sep 29, 2010, 2:11 PM 0
I don't think that the teacher was angry at all--she was just enforcing the no-cell-phone policy effectively. We give referrals, which earn the kids a five-day vacay from school. I'd much rather just drop the phone in a locked bin for disposal later--and if the policy were published, hey, fair warning!
posted on Feb 05, 2011, 12:52 AM 0
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):