Supreme Court rules cops need warrant to obtain location data generated by your phone

The ruling is limited to cell-site location data. Whether cops need a warrant to see the real time location of a criminal suspect using a cellphone is still undecided. Justice Roberts did note that there are exceptions that would allow authorities to use location data without first getting a warrant. When chasing a suspect, or protecting a person threatened with imminent physical harm, taking the time to request a warrant might not be feasible.

The case behind the ruling dealt with a man named Timothy Carpenter, who had been convicted of robbing multiple Radio Shack and T-Mobile stores in Ohio and Michigan. Law enforcement used past cellphone location data to link Carpenter with the crimes. Carpenter's ACLU attorney said that police needed to have a warrant to get the location data generated by his client's phone to prevent a violation of the Fourth Amendment, and the Supreme Court agreed. Carpenter's bid to suppress the data during trial was denied, and he was convicted of six counts of robbery. Today's ruling is a victory for him.

In three similar cases, the court also ruled against law enforcement. In 2014, the court ruled that with few exceptions, police must obtain a search warrant before going through the content of a cellphone when the user of the device is arrested. Two years before that, the court ruled that a warrant is required before attaching a GPS tracking device to a car.

Today's decision is more restrictive to law enforcement than current federal law is, and could lead to more rulings in the future that protect data produced by smartphones from unauthorized use by the police.

source: Reuters, CNBC