x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options

Study links cellphone usage and ADHD in Children

0. phoneArena posted on 22 Apr 2013, 10:15

It might not be a great idea to let your kids play around with a cell phone at a young age, according to a study conducted by the Department of Medicine at Dankook University College of Medicine in Korea which is testing to see if Radio Frequency Electro-Magnetic fields can affect young, developing brains after repeated exposure...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 22 Apr 2013, 10:26 2

1. xperiaDROID (banned) (Posts: 5629; Member since: 08 Mar 2013)

Children don't use cell phones right now, they're now using smartphones! Even a 8 years old kid is using a Samsung Galaxy S3. :P

posted on 22 Apr 2013, 10:29 1

2. Ardoleon (Posts: 13; Member since: 30 Nov 2012)

Right. Everyone, make sure that your children don't use a cell phone for 30 mins. after eating lead paint chips. Soooo...it couldn't POSSIBLY be the lead that was causing the problem, oh no. Independant studies sometime have no common sense.

posted on 22 Apr 2013, 12:12

6. Aeires (unregistered)

Exactly. It's like saying kids exposed to lead paint and wear blue clothes will develop ADHD, so don't let your kids wear blue clothes. I've read a lot of cell phone articles but never ran across one that said cell phones cause lead in the blood.

posted on 22 Apr 2013, 10:41

3. pookiewood (Posts: 631; Member since: 05 Mar 2012)

Where is the lead exposure supposed to be coming from? unless they are talking kids in other countries than the US that haven't outlawed Lead paint.

posted on 22 Apr 2013, 10:55

5. TheMan (Posts: 493; Member since: 21 Sep 2012)

The late '70s ban didn't just make the old layers of lead paint disappear. This is an old article I'm linking, but one should get my point:


posted on 22 Apr 2013, 10:47 1

4. TheMan (Posts: 493; Member since: 21 Sep 2012)

Seriously, parents are too often willing to use electronic devices (tablets, tv's, smartphones) to baby sit kids. It keeps them quiet, but it affects them developmentally -- and not in a good way, as the report shows.

posted on 22 Apr 2013, 12:32

8. quesoesgrande (Posts: 217; Member since: 03 Aug 2011)

Although I agree that too many parents use electronics to babysit their kids (which is a terrible parenting style, you idiots need to actually pay attention to your kid), this doesn't explain where the lead causing the problem comes from. If cell phones caused lead to flow through my blood, they wouldn't be legal. I will admit kids are willing to put odd things in their mouths, including phones. Despite that, I touch my phone then touch food and I've never had issues. Everyone is way too willing to point out the theoretical faults of the devices, while overall the benefits are huge.

posted on 22 Apr 2013, 12:27 1

7. quesoesgrande (Posts: 217; Member since: 03 Aug 2011)

I'm no expert, but I think this is BS. No matter how much evidence you show me, I don't think using a phone will give kids ADHD. I wouldn't give a little kid my phone anyways, but that's because I don't want my phone damaged.

posted on 22 Apr 2013, 14:43

14. EXkurogane (Posts: 863; Member since: 07 Mar 2013)

It will. It's induced ADHD. Kids get addicted to it over time. It's the same as why kids should be limited from computer games and watching TV. But nowadays parents prefer to keep their kids occupied with these gadgets so that their kids will not bug them, Actually, it's more like common sense, there's no need for this study to reveal it. My parents run a private tuition center and some students do exhibit this kind of symptom, thanks to addiction to gadgets. Their gadgets had to be confiscated and given back after class, and even so occasionally they begin to cause a ruckus. It's not that all kids will get ADHD from smartphones, but the risk is increased.

posted on 22 Apr 2013, 13:12

9. _PHug_ (Posts: 463; Member since: 11 Oct 2011)

Maybe we are creating a new master race that will be able to multi-task on a computer's level.
God knows we will need them when Skynet takes over.

posted on 22 Apr 2013, 13:20 1

10. downphoenix (Posts: 3165; Member since: 19 Jun 2010)

ADHD is a fake condition. There may be actual conditions that affect brain development, etc. but ADHD is a fake term that pharmaceuticals make up to sell more pills by making you think your lazy or rambunctious kid is actually affected with a condition.

posted on 22 Apr 2013, 14:07

11. quesoesgrande (Posts: 217; Member since: 03 Aug 2011)

Thank you, someone sees reason.

posted on 22 Apr 2013, 14:17

12. DaNTRoN (Posts: 135; Member since: 23 Jul 2012)

I worked mental rehab for children. And ADHD is fake. There is no link to video games. Nor food. Only the parents. I would throw the kids medication away everyday and fix there attitude and their parents thought I was Jesus.

It's only an animals instinct. If an animal (person) realizes they can do anything they want, why do what someone else says. So doctors think they have to have a problem. Give them pills and of course, if you sick the life out of a creature it will do anything you tell it. I want down with that.

If parents would teach their kids manners.... Well Bethune

posted on 22 Apr 2013, 14:19

13. DaNTRoN (Posts: 135; Member since: 23 Jul 2012)

Edit: sick = suck
Want = wasn't

posted on 22 Apr 2013, 15:50 1

17. Aeires (unregistered)

When I was a kid, there wasn't ADHD, it was called hyperactive. It usually was kids that weren't disciplined and left alone to do whatever they want. Now it's called a disease and drug companies make billions off this and it's sad. Medication is a poor substitution for parenting.

posted on 22 Apr 2013, 21:42

19. blazee (Posts: 414; Member since: 02 Jan 2012)

Did the parents know a janitor was throwing out their kids medications?

posted on 22 Apr 2013, 14:48 1

15. EXkurogane (Posts: 863; Member since: 07 Mar 2013)

Idiots like you who deny the existence of such a disease is why medical technology advancement, disease control, and education for the public gets hampered sometimes. It's like back in 1983 when AIDS was first discovered there are morons who called it fake and doesnt exist like you do now, with their own excuses, and later die one by one.

posted on 22 Apr 2013, 15:35 2

16. DaNTRoN (Posts: 135; Member since: 23 Jul 2012)

A virus is a living thing. It's a being inside you causing you harm. Can you find ADHD under a microscope? It's a socially created disorder not a natural one... Once again. I "cured" every kid they left me with. By discipline.

posted on 22 Apr 2013, 21:48

20. blazee (Posts: 414; Member since: 02 Jan 2012)

can you find any mental illness, personality disorder , homosexuality or feeling of happiness or sadness under a micro scope, Leave professinal work to professionals

posted on 23 Apr 2013, 04:53

21. EXkurogane (Posts: 863; Member since: 07 Mar 2013)

Im in medical field, and people with any kind of psychological-related issues, not just the 'mainstream' schizophrenia and psychosis but also things like ADHD, OCD (Obsessive Compulsive Disorder) have unique behaviors, and both hormone levels, how the the synaptic neuron respond to such changes and the brainwaves are also different.

posted on 22 Apr 2013, 21:39

18. blazee (Posts: 414; Member since: 02 Jan 2012)

thank you dr. downphoenix you must know so much about our current medicine

posted on 23 Apr 2013, 07:19

22. clevername (Posts: 1436; Member since: 11 Jul 2008)

First off, to downphoenix, you couldn't be more wrong. And to support my claim, most doctors now a days are even more careful and hesitant to make decisions regarding prescriptions in ADHD children. Most pediatricians are trying behavior and diet modification and saving drugs for the more severe cases. ADHD is very real.

second, even the so called link between television and ADHD has been refuted by psychologists as false. I believe that because of the age of definitive ADHD diagnosis can be tricky to pinpoint, and kids that are under 7 are hard to diagnose because of pure maturity levels, the reverse causality is what this study is showing.

I also wonder if they are even taking into account Piaget's stages of cognitive development. Since the early stages explain most ADHD fears away.
it would be nice to know demographics as well. How old were these kids when the study began? How many kids and across how many regions? Can the study be repeated with fewer variable such as no lead?

any psychology student who has had more than a month of psych 101 can come up with these very valid questions. Perhaps this experiment needs to be redesigned. A longitudinal study would better track something of this nature.

posted on 23 Apr 2013, 07:24

23. clevername (Posts: 1436; Member since: 11 Jul 2008)

Btw, I'm a medical.professional who has had more than a month odlf psych 101 and I know this stuff. So if I do, that study must be severely flawed. For one, like I said, that lead variable. You need to take it out to show any validity between phone usage, or game playing, or electronics, and ADHD. Lead does horrible things to children. Including effecting synaptic activity (my field of expertise)

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 00:12

24. midgetsumo (Posts: 1; Member since: 27 Nov 2013)

Radiofrequency should not be treated as a confounding factor in this study.
First of all we are all exposed to some level of lead even if we do not "eat lead paint chips"
Secondly there is a positive relationship between lead and ADHD. The author is suggesting that radiofrequency from mobile phone could act as a somewhat a "catalyst" by opening up the blood brain barrier. Of course I agree that the study wouldve been better if they have compared within the group with moderate blood lead level -group exposed tk radiofrequency vs those who have not to see whether radiofreuncy enhances the effect of lead.

Now there are actual researches focusing on the effect of radiofrequency on blood brain barrier.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories