Sony Xperia T is the company's new T-Rex of a phone, and the new phone of James Bond

Sony has unveiled one of its newest smartphones – the ICS-powered Xperia T, which seems to pack quite a punch. Specs-wise, the Xperia T is equipped with a large 4.6” HD BRAVIA display, which will obviously take advantage of the Mobile BRAVIA engine that enhances media for your viewing pleasure...
This is a discussion for a news article. To read the whole news, click here

44 Comments

1. josephnero

Posts: 777; Member since: Nov 16, 2011

nice but i hoped for S4pro.still good

15. MeoCao unregistered

What a beautiful phone, but it's not the Mint we saw.

22. MeoCao unregistered

So Sony will take a direct collision course against iPhone. Very interesting.

29. XperiaUser unregistered

Sony have a best potential to compete with apple , just wait and see

2. josephnero

Posts: 777; Member since: Nov 16, 2011

also is it using 1080p screen?cause engadget says so

3. bobfreking55

Posts: 866; Member since: Jul 15, 2011

... jellybean.... hope sony releases a nexus.

4. TheRetroReplay

Posts: 256; Member since: Mar 20, 2012

Come to Verizon please!

42. InspectorGadget80 unregistered

You guys are getting the RAZR HD with HUGE BATTERY since AT&T won't be getting this I'M BUYING THE XPERIA T!!

5. DSLundMobilfunk

Posts: 2; Member since: Aug 29, 2012

What a great Device ! Sony ist back.....the new Xperia Line is so much better as for example the ARC S. Great Camera, Perfect Design .....all necessary technical Specs included. Who wants more ? The Split from Ericsson was one of the beste decisions from Sony ever. Well done Sony.......Markus fromhttp://www.DSLundMobilfunk.de

6. The_Innovation

Posts: 648; Member since: Jul 18, 2012

Well in comparison to the LG Optimus G, it's not quad-core (using the next generation processors), it's not 2GB of ram, and the screen resolution isn't as high. Also it won't record 1080P with 60fps I assume? Is it still a better phone? Or does Sony have other beasts to unleash?

11. sadaff

Posts: 12; Member since: Jul 18, 2012

Quad core from LG sounds good but obviously Sony updates their phones unlike LG so having a Quad core from LG is of no use!

18. redmd

Posts: 1916; Member since: Oct 26, 2011

with technology these days, you are likely to update your phone than it's OS. I think LG is the better phone.

24. Mittal

Posts: 494; Member since: Dec 14, 2011

Sony will probably price the T close to the G, timely updates is a trait respected, but that doesnt make it better than the G It is one thing to say that the T offers enough power for most uses and that what addition G offers is of no practical use yet, but its not like slow updates make the G incompetent in front of T Frankly, had the G been released by Samsung, it would have generated 100 times more excitement

32. The_Innovation

Posts: 648; Member since: Jul 18, 2012

Yea true, but I think with todays technology, software is actually more important for people, and more is possible with software updates, so timely updates are a pretty big deal.

41. Mittal

Posts: 494; Member since: Dec 14, 2011

guess yur right!

17. RamyRamz69

Posts: 390; Member since: Dec 12, 2011

It has a better camera, design, UI skin, screen(Whitemagic > Anything) and is Playstation certified. Not to mention that you cannot trust LG with updates. And seriously, you won't notice the difference between S4 and S4Pro unless you're doing benchmarks or playing games that require Quad Core processors which are only found in Nividia Tegrazone.

20. The_Innovation

Posts: 648; Member since: Jul 18, 2012

I see, well I was really asking for more clarification, don't see the reason why people get mouse trigger happy clicking the thumbs down immediately lol. I see what you mean, but even with that in mind, do you think Sony will release another one with the same specs as the LG one? Meaning a quad-core phone...

28. RamyRamz69

Posts: 390; Member since: Dec 12, 2011

Why release a quad core phone when you have Dual Core Krait... And just fyi, the S4 Pro is an APQ chip and not an MSM, which means it's not as battery efficient as the normal S4.

33. The_Innovation

Posts: 648; Member since: Jul 18, 2012

Oh no....battery is my number 1 issue. So Sony is the better choice then?

35. nsnk86

Posts: 43; Member since: Jun 18, 2012

really amazing part is sony is gud with battery.... am using xperia S &am really amazed with its batt backup.......

36. The_Innovation

Posts: 648; Member since: Jul 18, 2012

Convincing enough, thanks.

38. nsnk86

Posts: 43; Member since: Jun 18, 2012

anytym buddy!! :)

7. keatonhj

Posts: 1; Member since: Aug 29, 2012

They didn't split from Ericsson. They own ericcsson! Also Sony paid quite a large sum to have their phone as the james bond phone. let's just say it's over a few million.

14. XiphiasGladius

Posts: 813; Member since: Aug 21, 2011

They didn't split? They own Ericcsson? Where were you form? Mars?

26. Mittal

Posts: 494; Member since: Dec 14, 2011

haha they dont own Ericsson, they just bought all the shares of their joint venture...

37. Atlas

Posts: 158; Member since: Apr 15, 2012

Ericsson is a very large brand of tech, its from Sweden and I doubt Sony Mobile paid Columbia (Sony Pictures) that much.

8. josephnero

Posts: 777; Member since: Nov 16, 2011

9. megaSUNNY

Posts: 88; Member since: Jun 26, 2012

another XPERIA family with transparent strips at bottom

10. sadaff

Posts: 12; Member since: Jul 18, 2012

Quad core from LG sounds good but obviously Sony updates their phones unlike LG so having a Quad core from LG is of no use!

27. Mittal

Posts: 494; Member since: Dec 14, 2011

lolz.. u decided to write that again??
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.