x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options

Samsung Galaxy S II hands-on

0. phoneArena posted on 14 Feb 2011, 08:10

PhoneArena handled the phone with the largest Super AMOLED screen to date, and the thin design is impressive, as well as are the improved brightness and the dual-core chipset upgrade...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 14 Feb 2011, 08:32 1

1. Moet007 (unregistered)

I dont get super excited about phones much, but since I have the Fascinate now and enjoy it alot. I'm definitely impressed with the improvements to the new Galaxy S lineup.

posted on 16 Feb 2011, 17:08

47. Tsais (Posts: 26; Member since: 16 Jun 2009)

hehe you're gettin drawn in...

posted on 18 Feb 2011, 11:43

53. jogutier (Posts: 324; Member since: 12 Feb 2010)

I don't know about getting anymore Samsung phones. I feel like a got screwed with froyo on Verizon's Fascinate. :( Even though Verizon is finally coming out with Froyo next month. It's a little to late to convince me. Sorry Samsung. Bye, bye , bye!

posted on 19 Feb 2011, 21:18

58. Tsais (Posts: 26; Member since: 16 Jun 2009)

yeah, Samsung is shoddy with software, I hate them.
i8910... updates took forever, just to bring it up to the capability advertised. PC Suite didn't work right with windows 7 a year after that was out. Then Symbian support got dropped a half a year after they released the phone.

Talk about a short life. The hardware was good though.
One could hope Android support won't be cut, and there will be custom roms, so you can just get a new Android version when you want to, and not when Samsung's software department finally figures out how to make software.

But in general, their attitude after the sale would lead me to buy a different brand anytime there's a choice.

posted on 14 Feb 2011, 09:01

2. dieselxdan (unregistered)

what carrier?

posted on 14 Feb 2011, 10:29

7. oneilmccord (Posts: 16; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)

I've read various rumors mentioning AT&T in the US and Vodafone in Europe, but I would imagine there will be variants available for all major carriers like with the original galaxy s.

posted on 14 Feb 2011, 09:01 1

3. Inolvidable (unregistered)

I am really disappointed with SGSII Quadrant score. I really hope the final version can improve performance.

posted on 16 Feb 2011, 23:34

48. Kennon (unregistered)

Quadrant benchmarks are such a bad measure of phone performance. I can get my Samsung Captivate up to 2500 with a couple of simple filesystem tweaks that do not improve perceivable performance in the least. I would like to see the openGL benchmarks on the new lineup of phones.

posted on 14 Feb 2011, 09:47 1

4. sergio1990 (unregistered)

Benchmark is way lower than Tegra 2(2700) and TI OMAP4(2958!!!) based phones... I hope Sammy has messed up with optimization or this phone is doomed to fail :-(

posted on 23 Feb 2011, 00:42

60. ItsMichaelNotMike (Posts: 8; Member since: 21 Nov 2010)

LOL... are you kidding. You do realize that 99.9999% of the people who buy these phones don't know squat about benchmarks, much less how the words "Tegra" and "optimization" relate to handsets.

Or do you mean this phone is doomed to fail like the Samsung Galaxy S did? ;) If you meant that, please define the word "fail" for us. Do you mean the one person in a bunker in Idaho who won't buy this phone because of benchmark tests? If so, that kind of failure Samsung can handle since no one else even knows how to conduct benchmark tests nor interpret the results.

Then again, you could be right. Somewhere there is another person who uses a professional timer to calculate how fast his apps open, that is, compared to his rooted G1.

posted on 14 Feb 2011, 10:01 1

5. cristianer (Posts: 42; Member since: 20 Aug 2010)

I don't know if buy this phone or wait the iPhone5.

posted on 14 Feb 2011, 10:44

8. oneilmccord (Posts: 16; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)

I do like apple products, including the iphone. Apple products almost always work together in perfect harmony and the ease of use make them great for the not-so tech savvy of consumers, and yet still offer comprehensive features that will easily quench the thirst of the highest productive demands. Apple works great with Apple, but if you want out of the Apple cage you will have to use some work-arounds to break the shackles... My personal preferance, go with the Galaxy SII. Not necessarily for the hardware, but the OS. I find Google's Android OS to be much more productive, useful, entertaining, and has much more potential than Apples IOS.

posted on 14 Feb 2011, 17:24

18. cristianer (Posts: 42; Member since: 20 Aug 2010)

You're right. But I don't know why the games in this phone runs more slowly than in others.

posted on 19 Feb 2011, 16:02

56. E.N. (Posts: 2610; Member since: 25 Jan 2009)

Wait for the iPhone 5. I'm sure the new iPhone will pack in a bunch of new features that compete with all these products. And if you still don't like the iPhone 5, just get this phone or the next Android phone that comes out. Cause if you buy this now and the iPhone is kick ass, you'll definitely regret it.

posted on 19 Feb 2011, 21:05 1

57. Tsais (Posts: 26; Member since: 16 Jun 2009)

no matter what they put into the new iPhone 5, its still a matter of fighting Steve Jobs' nasty restrictions every inch of the way.

Are these restrictions only relevant to geeks? I don't think so. Not if you got some relatives/friends/lovers in far away countries, you'd like to talk to while avoiding 2000 dollar monthly phone bills.

Jobs thinks of us "mass consumers" as too stupid to manage even a couple of apps running in the background, with the result, that I cannot receive skype calls on my iPhone. Cause every time I want to take a picture, check the weather, write an sms, or just look up something in my contacts, the iPhone closes down Skype.

And that's just one example of way too many, where you get stymied, just because Apple expects iPhone users to be inept morons.

Would be nice if they'd expect only some moronic users and some normal ones, so they might offer an advanced mode you can switch to.

But then, the moronic user is only part of Apple's reason, the other parts are control-freakishness and more greed than Gordon Gekko.

posted on 23 Feb 2011, 00:51 1

61. ItsMichaelNotMike (Posts: 8; Member since: 21 Nov 2010)

Spot on comment.

And the two main reasons why I will never buy an iPhone are: 1) a non-removable battery; and 2) no microSD slot.

I guess there's a #3... that 1 & 2 above are by design, to sell iPhones to the same people every year, to those whose battery fails, and to people who simply want more storage (after they discover that in these days of movies, videos and music that 16 GB is not enough, nor even 32 GB nowadays).

It really frosts me how people would buy the only cell phone on the planet that's so clearly limited simply so Apple can make money. I mean, come on, a cell phone with a battery that can't be user replaced; and without a microSD slot... that's criminal.

posted on 14 Feb 2011, 10:08

6. oneil (unregistered)

You can't always trust Quadrant, or any other benchmark for that matter. I got a score of just over 2500 on my captivate without overclocking and just using a lagfix.

posted on 14 Feb 2011, 10:52 1

10. giantgnome (Posts: 67; Member since: 11 Feb 2011)

Yeah it's probably just a software thing. Don't get me wrong, Sammy makes great hardware but their track record with the software part isn't so fantastic *cough* Android 2.1 *cough*.

Anyways, as long as this beast can play my 1080p movies without me needing to re-encode them this will be my next phone.

posted on 15 Feb 2011, 09:20

30. oneilmccord (Posts: 16; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)

Indeed, you can't always count on Samsung for software updates. Personally however, with any phone I have and will ever have, Samsung or not, I will use custom roms for the firmware. So, lack of updates isn't a problem for me. I think I will make this my next phone.

posted on 14 Feb 2011, 10:47

9. lukasound (unregistered)

I don't think this score is correct... with such a processor it wouldn't be able to process 1080p 30fps recording. This is possible only if the gpu is so powerful that for video it takes the load off such a "slow" processor.

In any way, this phone is capable of the highest resolution and fps video of any other phone on the market. That makes it the most powerful - not a benchmark number.

1080p could be the only reason for such powerful dualcores - everything else is already snappy enough on a single core 1Ghz processor (SE even made a whole gaming platform around one).

It will be a different time when we will be able to transcode fullHD video or run Adobe Premiere or 3D Studio Max on our phones.

posted on 14 Feb 2011, 10:58 3

11. giantgnome (Posts: 67; Member since: 11 Feb 2011)

The thing is, Samsung is using a Quadcore GPU so it's possible that a single core by itself is considerably slower when compared to the other phone's GPU. Being that Quadrant isn't updated for dual core CPUs and multi-core GPUs the benchmarks are gonna look funny no matter what you do. We need the final retail phones along with an updated quadrant program to know the actual benchmarks.

posted on 15 Feb 2011, 09:31

32. oneilmccord (Posts: 16; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)

Too true.

posted on 14 Feb 2011, 11:17

12. danielsan (unregistered)

This is better than the LG Optimus 3D?

posted on 15 Feb 2011, 09:24

31. oneilmccord (Posts: 16; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)

I think so. Sure the specs on the Optimus 3D are impressive (4GB of RAM), but I think the 3D capabilities are a waste of space. The slimmer design, the super AMOLED plus screen, and the superior SOC are the selling points of this phone.

posted on 15 Feb 2011, 16:49 1

39. oneilmccord (Posts: 16; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)

Correction: not 4GB it's actually 4Gb = 512 MB

posted on 17 Feb 2011, 12:44

50. chinakidoliver.iab (Posts: 75; Member since: 07 Dec 2010)

naw the lg optimus 3d scored higher and it is extremly fast tho it will be a bit bulky but who knows i could be wrong i dont have any of those phones so i cant tell u which 1 is better.

posted on 14 Feb 2011, 12:03

13. Vic D (unregistered)

A "No Hands" reference? Hilarious

posted on 14 Feb 2011, 13:51

14. hicky (unregistered)

please have good battery life! an this is mine!

although lookin forward to desire hd2 and desire 2 :)

posted on 14 Feb 2011, 14:50 1

15. khaddem (unregistered)

what will you choose? Galaxy S2 or LG Optimus 2x if you were presented the phones and have 1 minute? The average users don't really follow the test on benchmark but want to know if the phone is fast enough for internet browsing, video and picture taking. Some of the most important questions are if the phone is user friendly, has enough memory, has good speakers and is compatible with "4G" network. So, can any of you geniouses help an average user like myself make a decision? Thank you for your feedback.

posted on 15 Feb 2011, 09:36 1

33. oneilmccord (Posts: 16; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)

I would recomend, considering what you are looking for in a phone, the Galaxy S2. The specs are close enough that what you will be using it for you might not even notice a difference in performance. So, the reason I say get the Samsung is because of the slim design and the superior screen.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories