Poll: Will you pay $249 for the Moto 360

So, a new Best Buy listing has apparently outed the specs and pricing of the Motorola Moto 360 Android Wear smartwatch. There were some surprises in the listing, like the Texas Instruments processor and Wireless N connectivity, but the biggest news of all is in the listed price tag of $249...
This is a discussion for a news article. To read the whole news, click here


21. michaelmicro unregistered

I wouldn't buy it regardless of price. Smartwatches are just another way for clever companies to make money from stupid consumers.

22. tigermcm

Posts: 861; Member since: Sep 02, 2009

well ive seen ppl pay the same or more for regular watches so $250 doesnt seem bad plus im sure it would drop $100 after like 3months same as smart phones

27. GreekGeek

Posts: 1276; Member since: Mar 22, 2014

My smartphone is my watch, no thank you

29. odachek1976

Posts: 14; Member since: Sep 01, 2013

I dun believe in smart watches. The future is not about smart watches. In the future, when there are flexible e-newspapers, magazines, touchscreen windows displays on tables and cabinets and all around wherever you walk, who need a smart watch right?;)

30. DFranch

Posts: 548; Member since: Apr 20, 2012

I might pay $250, but only with a metal band. That leather band doesn't look good to me.

36. Planterz

Posts: 2120; Member since: Apr 30, 2012

I really don't see the market for these "wearables". So few people buy and wear watches the days, and the ones that do buy real timepieces, not some tech device. The rest will have a hard time justifying spending $200-300 for a thingy that saves them the excruciating trouble of pulling their phones out of their pockets to see a FB notification or whatheverthef*ck these smart watches are supposed to do. Those that buy them will probably use them for a week or so, get sick of having to charge yet another device, realize that they're nearly useless, and regret spending the money on one. I expect that the only smartwatch that might be a success is the iWatch, if only because iDiots will buy them and flaunt them like the hipster morons they are.

37. Edward_bly

Posts: 278; Member since: Dec 11, 2013

I wouldn't pay more than $60 for it.

38. Sniggly

Posts: 7305; Member since: Dec 05, 2009

If LG can charge $230 for the G watch, Motorola can most definitely charge 20 bucks more for a far superior device. If I had the money I'd buy.

39. tasior

Posts: 265; Member since: Nov 04, 2012

Smartwatch is a natural companion, when owning giant phone, that is not easily taken out from a pocket. As I avoid buying large phones, I don't need a smartwatch.

40. gaara6775

Posts: 738; Member since: May 20, 2014

No thanks.I would buy a xiaomi mi3 for that price. LoL

41. Fuego84

Posts: 357; Member since: May 13, 2012

$249 and without a camera, no thanks Moto. I want a smart watch with a camera but a Samsung galaxy gear ill pass on that too.

42. DFranch

Posts: 548; Member since: Apr 20, 2012

Why would you want a camera on your watch?
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.