Palm Pre and Pixi hit server logs wearing AT&T colors, running webOS 1.3.8

This article contains unofficial information.
Palm Pre and Pixi hit server logs wearing AT&T colors, running webOS 1.3.8
As we previously reported, two webOS devices are expected to hit AT&T by the first half of the year. Now let's play Cellphone Trivia. How many webOS phones do you know? And how many are supposed to go to AT&T? Great. You're a winner. To add to the math, pre central took a look at the server logs offered by DSL Reports and found AT&T branded versions of the Pre and Pixi running webOS 1.3.8 on the internet. This doesn't guarantee that the carrier's two webOS devices will be the Pre and Pixi, but the math sure adds up. While Verizon plans on releasing its version of the two phones with webOS 1.4, it remains to be seen if AT&T will at least match Big Red's OS build if it indeed launches a Pre and Pixi of its own.

Palm Pre Specifications | Review
Palm Pixi Specifications | Review

source: precentral



1. Mateo8326

Posts: 472; Member since: Jul 15, 2009

i think Att is gonna burn themself out by tring to keep up with verizon just let them have it right now geez, don't match surpass. No one competes with the number 1 just be in the same place as number 1 that's stupid.

2. *HOVA*

Posts: 564; Member since: Dec 11, 2008

Your comment makes no sense. They are talking about OS builds, what the hell are you trying to say? One is a GSM version one is CDMA so the same build won't neccessarliy be available at the same time...

6. tonyc_42

Posts: 61; Member since: Aug 18, 2009

it's pretty obvious that mateo is trying to say that whenever verizon does something, att tries to match them instead of taking their time and doing something better not anything about this article in general. damn hova it's not that complicated to understand.

8. *HOVA*

Posts: 564; Member since: Dec 11, 2008

You're all fucking idiots. You're telling me Verizon is "better" because they will POSSIBLY release the same phone ATT is with a SLIGHTLY upgraded OS?? You people need a fucking hobby.


Posts: 158; Member since: Dec 11, 2008

yet you're the one name calling on the internet....someone needs a hobby but it damn sure ain't us.

13. SamTime

Posts: 253; Member since: Nov 07, 2009

Verizon's WebOS phones will probably come with "Plus" as opposed to AT&T's versions...

3. LGVX1993

Posts: 260; Member since: Jan 27, 2009

Instead of giving the Pre and Pixi to all of the carriers, Palm should be coming up with new devices.

5. vzwtechbill

Posts: 175; Member since: Mar 16, 2009

Ones that don't suck would be nice too lol

7. testman22

Posts: 339; Member since: Nov 03, 2009

+1. to both of you. If I could get Web OS on some better hardware I would probably take it over android

9. macron2000

Posts: 81; Member since: Sep 07, 2009

Yes Palm could use a refresh on devices. Web OS on a phone with solid build quality would be nice.

10. rhomaion

Posts: 187; Member since: Sep 23, 2009

Who said the pixi had bad hardware? Do you guys even try the phones before you start hatin? Fucking retards!

12. vzw fanman

Posts: 1977; Member since: Dec 11, 2008

don't use the word "retard" bro, it's immature and rude. not cool.

14. LGVX1993

Posts: 260; Member since: Jan 27, 2009

super late but I never said it had bad hardware. Im just saying they should come up with new designs

4. vzw fanman

Posts: 1977; Member since: Dec 11, 2008

i've looked at those results too. once it said iphone. so does that mean the iphone was running on verizon's network?

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.