x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options

Nokia 808 PureView now officially coming to the US, priced at $699

0. phoneArena posted on 19 Jun 2012, 02:38

The Nokia 808 PureView might just be the revolution in cameraphones, and that revolution is now officially coming to the United States…

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 19 Jun 2012, 02:49 1

1. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)

Does the PureView run on only T-Mo and AT&T networks (GSM) in the U.S.?

posted on 19 Jun 2012, 02:54 1

2. tigermcm (Posts: 860; Member since: 02 Sep 2009)

I'm pretty sure that is a yes

posted on 19 Jun 2012, 07:54

12. rembo65 (Posts: 58; Member since: 21 Oct 2011)

red pocket or simple mobile all the way!
especially after reading this article:http://www.phonearena.com/news/T-Mobiles-HSPA-42Mbps-network-faster-than-Verizons-4G-LTE-in-11-cities_id31387

posted on 19 Jun 2012, 08:15

13. -box- (Posts: 3991; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)

It'll run on any carrier that uses GSM, so, yes, T-Mobile and AT&T, along with any regional carriers and/or the carriers that use AT&T and/or T-Mobile's networks.

posted on 19 Jun 2012, 02:59 2

4. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)

I wonder if Nokia is going to release the PureView image sensor in the Lumia line?

posted on 19 Jun 2012, 03:05 2

5. dickwyn (Posts: 621; Member since: 07 May 2012)

yes they will in prodigy

posted on 19 Jun 2012, 03:50 3

6. Tsepz_GP (Posts: 1037; Member since: 12 Apr 2012)

$699 for a phone running on a platform that's already got one foot in the grave??? Madness!
If it was $499 it would make sense and even then some would rather wait for a price drop. 4-5years ago paying $699 for a flagship Symbian was fine as they had top hardware, a great OS and tons of developers, those days are but history now.

posted on 19 Jun 2012, 04:35 4

7. smartphone (Posts: 160; Member since: 21 Oct 2011)

It is only for the legacy customers and fans not everybody wants your 10 core smartphone with shaky video recording and snaps.
Still 699$ is a bit high I agree on that.
And don't tell me about apps I haven't a single person with more than 100 apps(only one geek) installed. Symbian has basic apps covered.

posted on 19 Jun 2012, 08:17 1

14. -box- (Posts: 3991; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)

Think of it this way;
$350 camera (comparable to the high-end point-and-shoots)
$350 phone (same price as a Nokia Lumia 710, which is an introductory or lower-middle-level smartphone running a newer, easier to use OS)

I myself wish it were closer to $500 myself, because it'd be easier to justify the price, but I'll spend the extra money because it's the only phone I'll be getting myself for the next few years, until Windows Phone 8 is released and matured and there's a PureView camera in a Lumia

posted on 19 Jun 2012, 05:25 1

8. Tsepz_GP (Posts: 1037; Member since: 12 Apr 2012)


1. NO, Symbian does NOT have the basics well covered.
2. WTF is "shaky" video and snaps? Please, dont come at me with that fanboy garbage.
3. NOBODY said it was about apps.

My GS2 takes excellent pics and vids, thank you very much :) , but thats not the point here, the point is that even Symbian fans will find this very steep, its almost as if Nokia don't want this to sell.

posted on 19 Jun 2012, 06:40 3

11. smartphone (Posts: 160; Member since: 21 Oct 2011)

No I am not a fanboy you are.
you said that this phone don't deserve even a 499$ price tag.
You should know that xperia arc has roughly same specs and can't do 1080p and a price tag of 550$ here in India.
Just because a device runs android doesn't mean you can charge anything for it.
Symbian may not have the games and stuff but basic apps it has.
Plus this device is for camera lovers, not every body plays angry birds on phones.

posted on 19 Jun 2012, 08:33 3

16. Snoobab (Posts: 175; Member since: 07 Dec 2011)

Errrm... Not to alarm you but Symbian Belle can do everything Android can, and then some. Android is _awesome_ but try Belle before you knock it. This is not S60v5 we're talking about. And what "smartphone" is refering to is Nokia's Rich Recording technology. Google it. P.S. It has nothing to do with quad-core CPUs, sorry.

posted on 19 Jun 2012, 12:46

18. disneydad (Posts: 114; Member since: 26 Mar 2012)

I agree, try Symbian before you knock it. Very robust and pretty OS though not as fluid as Android, WP, and iOS. Plus, Nokia build quality is awesome. I have a Nokia C7 that I use as a standalone GPS currently because of the Nokia Maps offline feature which works flawlessly. My only gripe with the C7 was that it was seriously under powered and not enough memory.

posted on 19 Jun 2012, 09:03 1

17. -RVM- (Posts: 331; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)

Funny how u american guys consider this price to be very steep. I'm from Slovakia, yet i have no problem to preorder this one for 550€ (700$). Same like i had no problem to buy N8 for 440€ in 2010.

Symbian has basics well covered. It also has free offline navigation for years, great battery performance, true multitasking, great video codec support, on-screen standby clock, the best camera UI (now in Belle FP1), supports mass storage mode, bluetooth file transfer, system-wide file manager, USB on-the-go, FM transmitter, HDMI 1080p output, Dolby Digital Plus, Dolby Headphone, DLNA, NFC... oh and it can even record your phone calls, unlike iPhone!

Your GS2 takes really good pics and vids for a smartphone, but it's nowhere near 808.

posted on 19 Jun 2012, 06:35 1

9. kanagadeepan (Posts: 975; Member since: 24 Jan 2012)

Why don't they release it on AT&T or T-Mobile with subsidized price like Lumia900??? Well the Tr0janH0rse won't like a symbian phone getting good sales in US, right...

Well done Tr0janH0rse, do you have the guts to sell PureView powered Lumia handset on FULL PRICE like this????

posted on 19 Jun 2012, 06:36 1

10. mercorp (Posts: 1043; Member since: 28 Jan 2012)

I hope some disgrunted us owner will find a way to make it run android.

posted on 19 Jun 2012, 08:32

15. -RVM- (Posts: 331; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)

maybe, but than it wouldn't be able to handle such camera.

posted on 19 Jun 2012, 12:53

19. lubba (Posts: 1313; Member since: 17 Jan 2011)

I was hoping for some update on Nokia wp8 and what carriers will get what so I can make decision to either stay with Tmo or drop them. But this and for $700. No thanks. I'll save that $700 for the Surface.

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 06:59

20. Tsepz_GP (Posts: 1037; Member since: 12 Apr 2012)

I said it doesn't deserve a price of $699, and rather $499 and that even at that point many would wait for a price drop, learn to read properly.
HD recording doesn't determine pricing, the Xperia Arc is priced like that thanks to it being a great overall package, something the 808 isn't.
Indeed, not everybody plays Angry Birds on their phones, many use them for Web browsing, Social Networking, watching high quality media, reading the news and ebooks, email, office tools like exchange etc...things an Arc, and other Androids do better than Symbian, thanks for validating my point. :)

Lol, dont make me laugh, Android matched Symbian functionality long ago with 2.2 Froyo, anything you name now will be due to hardware not the OS.
He has a strange way of talking Nokia's "rich" recording tech, as last i checked my GS2's recording is not "shaky" ,lol!

All that you mentioned is available on Android or bettered by OEM's technologies, and then some. ;) oh BTW thanks for showing how little progress Symbian has made in Belle.

posted on 20 Jun 2012, 09:28

21. -RVM- (Posts: 331; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)

Well i don't know about widely available Android smartphones with FM transmitter built-in, Dolby Digital plus or Dolby headphone support or even Xenon flash. They only learnt USB on-the-go with SGS2 last year (year after N8). Not to mention awesome camera technologies and Rich Recording.
Your claim about Android being able to do things better than Symbian is plain bs. There aren't even proper office tools (like MS Office) on Android. Also, social networking is great on Symbian with apps like Gravity. Also, Symbian has upper hand in watching "high-quality media", since it has great video-codec support out of the box, since N8 times.

posted on 21 Jun 2012, 06:34

22. Tsepz_GP (Posts: 1037; Member since: 12 Apr 2012)


You clearly haven't got a clue of what you're on about! :'D

Xenon Flash, FM Transmitter, "awesome" camera technologies (LOL!!) are hardware, not the OS! Its down to what OEMs choose to put in, i could argue that Symbians dont have great high res displays, nor are there great accessories for them.

WRT Xenon flash, FM Transmitter, and "awesome" Camera technologies with "rich" recording, there are ONLY TWO current Symbians with all these things in reality, one is the outdated non-FP1 Belle N8 the other the being the DOA Nokia 808 PureView. The majority of Symbians have awful EDoF cameras that cant even read a barcode due to no AF, they dont have Xenon flash, most dont have a FM transmitter. You are not guaranteed these features with each Symbian.

LOL! Excuse me? No proper Office Tools for Android???
Ever heard of Polaris Office or Kingsoft Office? Both of which are very powerful and take advantage of the excellent hardware in Android and allow sync with Evernote. These are just two of countless office apps available

Gravity, ah yes, that dated app, in Android apps like Seesmic, TweetCaster, TweetDeck, FriendCaster, Flipboard, Instagram, FourSquare, the OFFICIAL Twitter and Facebook apps etc...make gravity look rather old and primitive.

Androids have much better media support, other than the fact that Samsung and LG Androids support Xvid, DivX, FLAC etc...out-the-box in Android there are tons of media apps that enable many more codecs, VLC is even on its way.
Name me ATLEAST 5 Symbians that can play and record HD1080P video?
GS2, GS3, GNote, HTC Sensation, HTC One X, HTC One are just a few Androids i can name. :)

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories