x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options

Motorola Moto X beats the competition in LTE connectivity test

0. phoneArena posted on 21 Jan 2014, 17:11

A high-end smartphone could look cool and have a giant screen with high resolution, but if the connectivity with your carrier's LTE pipeline isn't any good, you might as well be carrying a brick. Signals Research Group decided to test some of the top Android smartphones now available such as the Samsung Galaxy S4, Samsung GALAXY Note II, HTC One, LG G2 and the Motorola Moto X...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 21 Jan 2014, 17:13 4

1. Duketytz (Posts: 534; Member since: 28 Nov 2013)

They didn't include Sony in the test... As with all 'high-end' smartphones, Sony will always be left out. Nevertheless good job Motorola!

posted on 21 Jan 2014, 17:48 4

4. rodneyej1 (Posts: 3576; Member since: 06 Jul 2013)

They should've included Nokia, and BB,, just for $hits, and giggles..

posted on 22 Jan 2014, 11:27

15. jroc74 (Posts: 6019; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)

That probably woulda been a closer contest. I think BB might have beat them.

posted on 21 Jan 2014, 17:26 1

2. Brendan126 (Posts: 14; Member since: 09 Dec 2010)

What were the other smartphones in accordance with the colors? As an owner of the G2 I have a feeling it was one of the lower ones... :/

posted on 21 Jan 2014, 17:33 2

3. galanoth (Posts: 426; Member since: 26 Nov 2011)

Why did they use a Galaxy Note 2 instead of a Galaxy Note 3.
Doesn't the Note 3 have the newer radio tech?

posted on 21 Jan 2014, 19:29

6. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10457; Member since: 14 May 2012)

My thoughts exactly..

posted on 21 Jan 2014, 19:09

5. Valanten (Posts: 19; Member since: 07 Apr 2009)

I change my cell phones pretty often... recently I bought the LG G2 and had big expectations for it and I wasn't wrong the phone is great, I love the camera, the buttons on the back and especially the battery life but after a while with it, traveling to a different states I had bad experience with it's radio signal, the worst from any other phone I use to own before which makes the LG G2 useless to me! I probably won't buy another LG anytime soon.

posted on 21 Jan 2014, 19:49 1

7. plonko (Posts: 4; Member since: 18 Dec 2013)

Would've Could've Should've. I call Shenanigans. How difficult would it have been to get an AT&T Moto X to make it a legit comparison rather than having someone pontificate that the results would be the same? To discount the importance of the network is sheer carelessness.

posted on 21 Jan 2014, 19:54 9

8. MichaelHeller (Posts: 2707; Member since: 26 May 2011)

Not surprising. If Motorola has one strength above most other manufacturers, it is in building mobile radios.

posted on 22 Jan 2014, 09:15

13. JunitoNH (Posts: 1934; Member since: 15 Feb 2012)

Yes Michael, but all things being the same. My iPhone beats the "X", hands down. Before anyone say anything stupid, yes I do own several devices, including the aforementioned.

posted on 22 Jan 2014, 11:28

16. jroc74 (Posts: 6019; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)


I lived n worked in poor reception areas....and Moto was the best overall in my experience with Android phones.

posted on 21 Jan 2014, 20:23 7

9. BattleBrat (Posts: 1476; Member since: 26 Oct 2011)

Motorola always had strong radios....

posted on 21 Jan 2014, 20:47

10. 14545 (Posts: 1671; Member since: 22 Nov 2011)

Anyone know what the other smartphone labels are? I'm curious who is last and where the S4 is.

posted on 22 Jan 2014, 07:15

11. troutsy (Posts: 319; Member since: 17 Feb 2012)

From the source, "Signals Research declined to specify which smartphones were represented by the other lines"

posted on 22 Jan 2014, 08:09

12. 14545 (Posts: 1671; Member since: 22 Nov 2011)

Thanks, I looked at the source and missed that.

posted on 22 Jan 2014, 11:25

14. jroc74 (Posts: 6019; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)

This is a no brainer to us long time Moto fans. Its one main reason they remain my fav phone manufacturer.

posted on 22 Jan 2014, 16:39

17. 777light777 (Posts: 63; Member since: 14 Aug 2013)

The force is strong with this one.

Good job Moto! :)

(hoping for a Moto nexus at some point)

posted on 26 Jan 2014, 10:13

18. Joshua9007 (Posts: 94; Member since: 08 Jun 2012)

I wish 2 different things from this, first that they would have done this for every carrier, and 2nd that they would have listed the other phones on the graph. I have a GS4 on sprint and is actually a decent RF performer, but people that I know on Verizon that live in the country had to return the Verizon model b/c it had no service in their house (where they were at least able to make calls for 10+ yrs)
The AT&T 700MHz band will have similar performance to Verizon, but it would be nice to see the data. Also AT&T uses AWS spectrum where they don't have 700MHz, and Verizon is adding that soon as well for capacity. So it would be neat to see if the phones still still ranked the same on the other frequencies.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories