x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options

Motorola Moto G specs leak; phone will be free on contract?

0. phoneArena posted on 31 Oct 2013, 17:21

A tweet from none other than evleaks reveals the specs for the Motorola Moto G; this is expected to be the low priced version of the Motorola Moto X although the specs belie the idea that this is going to be a budget phone. Yes, the 4.7 inch screen has a resolution of 720 x 1280, but there will be a quad-core 1.5GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro Processor under the hood with 8GB or 16GB of native storage on board...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 31 Oct 2013, 17:38 2

1. Santi_Santi (unregistered)

Like it.

posted on 31 Oct 2013, 17:39 3

2. Doakie (Posts: 2227; Member since: 06 May 2009)

Yeah. Sounds pretty unappealing now that there's a $349 16GB Nexus 5 released. Even at free you could easily do what I just did recently buy an iPhone 5S 16 GB for $199 then sell it for $600 new in box. Profit $400, then order a Nexus 5. Free Nexus 5. Better specs, direct updates from Goog, same freeness.

posted on 31 Oct 2013, 17:58 4

4. VirtueParadoxx (Posts: 7; Member since: 31 Oct 2012)

That logic is extremely flawed, either way now you're locked into a contract, and are ultimately going to end up paying upwards of 2000 all together, so why not just wait a week or two and just buy the Nexus 5 outright, and then go to a carrier like tmobile and pay about 50 bucks a month for unlimited everything.

posted on 31 Oct 2013, 19:12

9. papss (unregistered)

I think your vision is flawed too.. why go to a overall weak carrier like tmob when you can get much better overall coverage with att.

posted on 31 Oct 2013, 19:38 1

12. Zero0 (Posts: 592; Member since: 05 Jul 2012)

Because we don't all need coverage outside of big cities and suburbs.

And where T-Mobile has a 4G presence, they have been absolutely stellar in my experience.

posted on 31 Oct 2013, 19:31

11. chris_21 (Posts: 6; Member since: 26 Mar 2012)

Because if you live in a area like where I do and t-mobile is weak and stuck on 2G, that's not an option.

posted on 31 Oct 2013, 17:47

3. LindaC (Posts: 10; Member since: 31 Oct 2013)

Very good but what carrier?

posted on 31 Oct 2013, 18:17

5. Berzerk000 (Posts: 4275; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)

What? So Motorola is actually going to release a more powerful "cheap" version of the Moto X? That's weird. Also, how do they expect to keep the same features without taking a major hit to battery life? Without those super low power dedicated cores to handle all the sensors that listen for your voice all the time and sense movement, the main CPU will have to do it and that will kill battery life fast since it will be on constantly.

posted on 01 Nov 2013, 15:02

15. rabidhunter (Posts: 90; Member since: 05 Jul 2013)

Not sure where you're seeing where it's more powerful than the Moto X. Moto X has the Snapdragon S4 Pro processor clocked at 1.7 GHz. I'm not sure what the RAM is on the Moto G, but my guess is 1 GB (Moto X has 2 GB). Also the onboard storage starts at 16 GB for the Moto X.

posted on 01 Nov 2013, 15:15

16. Berzerk000 (Posts: 4275; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)

This has a quad core S4 Pro. The one in the Moto X is dual core, but with 2 low power cores dedicated to contextual computing and voice recognition. 1.5 GHz quad core Krait 200 (maybe 300) is faster than 1.7 GHz dual core Krait 300.

posted on 01 Nov 2013, 15:22

18. rabidhunter (Posts: 90; Member since: 05 Jul 2013)

Oh, right, I skipped over the quad-core part. Just thought that it was an underclocked version of the S4 Pro chip in the Moto X.

I think that they may not be using the contectual features.

posted on 01 Nov 2013, 15:42

19. rabidhunter (Posts: 90; Member since: 05 Jul 2013)

Okay, I saw another website had a different spec sheet. The processor is the Quadcore S4 Pro clocked at 1.2 GHz, not 1.5. You are correct that it is not using the X8 Processing unit.

The feature set does not list the contextual features.

posted on 31 Oct 2013, 18:23 3

6. GrapeEyes (Posts: 248; Member since: 01 Sep 2013)

Through it in the bin, pathetic specs!!

posted on 31 Oct 2013, 18:34 4

7. ocilfa (Posts: 334; Member since: 03 Aug 2012)

Looking at your picture, it looks like you need some new spec's. Your spelling would probably improve!

posted on 31 Oct 2013, 19:15 1

10. papss (unregistered)

I sort of agree on the specs front. I just don't have any appeal for any moto. They have been mediocre since they were purchased in my opinion.

posted on 01 Nov 2013, 15:17

17. rabidhunter (Posts: 90; Member since: 05 Jul 2013)

#1 Must be nice you being able to afford the nicest phone in the lot and all. But keep in mind that not everybody can afford the best specs. (Yes, I know the Nexus 5 is a steal at $349, but that's up front and not everybody can afford that. Plus not everybody can get a good signal with the carriers that the Nexus 5 will work on)

#2 With the update to 4.1 specs matter less, 4.2.2 added further performance enhancements as did 4.3. Now with the update to 4.4 (which these phones most likely will ship with) they matter even less, since it can run just fine on 512 MB of RAM.

#3 The Moto X and DROIDs 3 can handle themselves very well against any other flagship phone. They are fast and light.

#4 Which brings me back to point #1. You're not the target audience for these phones. The Moto G phones are marketed for pre-paid markets and developing markets. I mean, have you ever seen the types of phones that are available on the pre-paid market? The Moto G is ahead in those markets.

posted on 01 Nov 2013, 21:13

20. Pancholo (Posts: 380; Member since: 27 Feb 2012)


I'm impressed nobody corrected him. He only got spanked.

posted on 31 Oct 2013, 18:37

8. Diazene (Posts: 129; Member since: 01 May 2013)

just hope it gets released worldwide

posted on 01 Nov 2013, 00:09

13. Sniggly (Posts: 7305; Member since: 05 Dec 2009)

I think EVLeaks is completely off. None of this lines up with a budget Moto X.

posted on 01 Nov 2013, 11:50

14. roldefol (Posts: 4365; Member since: 28 Jan 2011)

Yeah, why would the budget phone have a quad-core when the X doesn't? Wouldn't it be easier to plop in the X8 and just cut corners on memory, storage, and build?

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories